With Gerrard's appointment at Villa in mind, I take a deep-dive into his managerial abilities and achievements at Rangers in an effort to predict how he fits in at the club. Regardless of that, the entertainment value in the PL increases tenfold with Stevie G back ✌️
THREAD.
Gerrard is an exciting appointment for Villa but the key to him improving as a coach within his 4-3-3 centres around the aggressiveness of the fullbacks, much like Nuno at Spurs and Klopp at Liverpool. Nuno was sacked due to a lack of aggressiveness, Klopp won a PL/CL due to it.
Gerrard sets his teams up in the same narrow 4-3-3 shape as Klopp at Liverpool and it led to his Rangers team having an invincible season, breaking Celtic's decade long dominance by winning Rangers' first league title in 10 years, and only conceded 13 goals in 38 games!
Structurally, Gerrard's Rangers were compact and difficult to play through, particularly when aggressive high up the pitch. This aggression was most prevalent early on in games which saw them go 1-0 up before being able to manage gamestate within a more passive narrow 4-3-3.
This was enabled by the fact that Rangers had superior quality to every team in Scotland so they could control games early on when it was frantic with their aggressive pressing whilst being superior technically to each team. Against the likes of B. Leverkusen, it didn't work.
In those games, Rangers were forced back into a deep block and had 35% of the ball in both the home and away leg. This is normal because Leverkusen have better technicians, but it's also down to structural issues too. Rangers were passive when pressing the opposition fullbacks.
Another example can be seen below against Celtic. Celtic are building play here but Rangers are passive and are easily forced back into a deep block - this is problematic because their structure isn't conducive to defending deep. There's lots of space on the sides to exploit.
Within the Premier League, each team has top technicians to easily make that pass and force Gerrard's Villa back into a deeper block. Within that deep block, there's a lot of space down the sides to exploit and that's where teams combine so Villa will be very vulnerable.
When Villa's narrow 4-3-3 block is easily bypassed, and it will be if Gerrard doesn't improve upon the lack of positional aggression from the fullbacks, they'll be defending with 7 players with the wide players shuttling back but that's not going to keep out nearly every PL side.
The likes of Liverpool, City, Chelsea and lower teams like Brentford will get a lot of joy down the sides and use their combinations on the side to exploit that major weakness within Villa's deep block. Villa will also be exploitable when transitioning into that deeper block.
So, what Gerrard wants to prevent is defending deep. If his team is defending deep within that narrow 4-3-3 structure, then he's got major issues. To improve upon that, he must 1) be more aggressive with the positioning of the vertical block & 2) task the fullbacks to press high.
So, a specific example of that exact scenario can be seen here. Liverpool's general block is much higher than Rangers' block thus increasing the pressure on the build-up. The narrow 3-3 press is also backed up by the fullback who ultimately retrieves possession for The Reds.
Nuno tried to replicate Klopp's Liverpool but failed miserably due to the conservative positioning of the fullbacks. Liverpool defend in the same shape but the difference is when the oppositions fullbacks receive each lane is closed off because they're pressurised from all angles
So, Liverpool's block shift across in this manner which has each angle/player covered:
Or when pressing even higher up the pitch they press in this manner (crucial focus is on the ball-side fullbacks for each team).
Each passing lane is covered. If the ball carrier wants to recycle, Salah is right on top of him, if he wants to go inside, Hendo is there, if he wants to go down the line, TAA is in his way. The only free pass is to switch the play under intense pressure, but that's not feasible
So, for Gerrard to succeed in the Premier League he must improve the aggression in which his teams press in the narrow 4-3-3 shape. Personnel is not an issue either - the likes of Ings, Watkins, McGinn, Nakamba, Targett, Cash, etc, etc are all suited to this intense style.
Gerrard's understanding of balance in terms of combining player profiles for his system is good, and his on-ball structure is good too and is again very similar to that at Liverpool, but none of that will matter if he doesn't enable his teams to control games without the ball.
Overall, it'll be interesting to see which way Gerrard sets Villa up and if he improves upon his structural issues at Rangers despite the top job he did there - I am merely suggesting that once his specific Rangers system style faces higher quality competition it can be exposed.
However, at Rangers, that system was good enough thanks to the opposition Gerrard's teams faced, and that saw his teams accumulate phenomenal achievements within his time at the club. He quite literally could not have done a better job.
Either way, it's great to have him back 👍
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
West Ham are a top team, and going 1-0 down early on against them with a goal that arguably shouldn't have stood makes the game 10x harder considering how the gamestate suits their style (they can be content with sitting back in a deep block & countering because they're winning).
So, for Liverpool to lose to a team who are that awkward to play against within that game state when some decisions didn't go their way is fine. This is the Premier League - there are many top, top teams - West Ham could easily make it to a CL quarter final & be competitive in it
Liverpool did well to sustain pressure and worked some nice angles to get crosses into the box vs West Ham's low block and were typically dangerous in all other phases of play too (counters, second ball situations, transitions, etc, etc). But again, it's a tough game for any team
Mikel Arteta's Arsenal are one of the most exciting teams in world football, and they're due to explode. In the below mega-thread I discuss why Arteta's tactics are conducive to enabling the team to do just that once they mature and blossom from kids into men.
THREAD.
Against Spurs, Arsenal started well pressing wise which enabled them to assert their technical quality on the game which saw them go 2-0 up before scoring a 3rd shortly after. However, in the 2nd half, Spurs had 62% of the ball & forced the passive Arsenal back into a deep block.
The theme continued in the next game against Brighton where Arsenal started well pressing wise because the game was in its most frantic period (the start of the game when everybody is fully fit) before being forced back into a deeper block & having only 42% of the ball overall.
It was obvious Dean Smith & Villa's model is deeply flawed. The systems Smith plays are old-school & flawed and the transfer market approach is similarly archaic. They are not building towards a specific system - Villa simply signed players they think are good with no clear plan.
Right there Villa scored because Buendia and Watkins are good players but their methods of chance creation are reliant on player quality. They are legitimate relegation contenders despite having top, top players like Ollie Watkins and Danny Ings because of the tactical imbalance.
And right there they conceded because their pressing structure was bang average. Smith is a very average coach, but Villa's fundamental approach to long-term progression is very poor. The only way to rebuild is to pick a manager with a good & set system before building around it.
The Arteta revolution continues. It's all starting to become very clear that Arteta's tactics are superb now that he has the players to replicate them. Next step for Arsenal is to maintain that aggression from minute 1-90, but the intent to do that is clear from a tactical POV.
However, let's not get it mistaken - the game could have went either way today. Leicester were woefully individually in the first half and still pinned Arsenal back a lot of the time. ARS also scored two relatively fortunate goals. 2nd half LEI sustained pressure & were unlucky.
The same theme occurred again for Arsenal - they were superb early on when they were at their physical peak and they excelled technically and controlled the game early on. Then they were forced back due to a flawed press, and then 2nd half lacked aggression & could've conceded 3.
Leicester are a top team and a v. difficult match up for Arsenal. In possession they play a 3-2 shape in the build-up with the wingbacks pinned high and wide. Iheanacho drifts to the right half space BTL, Maddison goes to the left half space BTL, & Vardy is the focal pt.
THREAD.
This on-ball shape enables an overload in the build-up, compactness in defensive transition, good chance creation methods on the sides in settled attacks.. this combined with their technical & physical level means they can force ARS back, play through their press & win MF duels.
It's in the latter two instances where someone like Jamie Vardy comes alive in transition, & that become even more evident when Leicester retrieve possession high up the pitch within their asymmetric 5-3-2/4-4-2 high press (wingbacks press opposition fullbacks making it a 4-4-2).
The game started off in a toe-to-toe manner when energy was high so it was all about winning 2nd balls, technical quality & pressing. Each team did well in this sense & United did really well at one point to play out of Liverpool’s press before leaving Fernandes in this position.
United’s press was well structured in certain phases of play after this too with standard pressing triggers matching up - winger on fullback, midfield on Liverpool’s interiors, Fernandes dropping onto Henderson before pressurising the CB’s, CB's stepping high when required...