3/ The value capture by Bitcoin can go beyond sound money.
Specifically, Bitcoin as a global settlement layer can make Bitcoin block space extremely valuable in the future.
4/ Decentralization of Trust is the most significant opportunity for value creation since the internet.
The internet transformed Information Access. Bitcoin transforms Trust.
5/Trust has obvious value: not just money but other assets, identity, reputation, and trade depend on it.
Decentralization of Trust enables new apps and business models across several industries.
6/ Bitcoin is the best settlement layer for applications: Bitcoin provides the most secure and grassroots Decentralized Trust.
Apps utilizing the decentralization properties of Bitcoin will be more valuable, which in turn makes Bitcoin more valuable, and a network effect starts.
7/ If you factor in the settlement layer value capture, then the $10 trillion estimates start to look conservative.
What is the value of global real estate tokenization? Settlement layer for global trade? Future derivatives markets? The list goes on.
8/ The bullish case for Bitcoin as sound money is well understood. The bullish case for Bitcoin as a settlement layer is at the early stages.
If you’re bullish on Bitcoin just as sound money, then you’re not bullish enough.
P.S: The news out of Miami today of BTC yield to residents is an example of such settlement layer use cases where new apps grow the Bitcoin economy.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I've been politely responding to criticism from @adam3us@notgrubles for weeks.
It's time to set the record straight RE Liquid vs. Stacks.
Please retweet to help educate people.
Tweet thread👇
1/ First of all, I highly respect the contributions of Adam Back and Grubles. We can disagree on some topics, but that does not take away my respect for them.
Let's dive into their criticism of Stacks and how it compares to the work they prefer: Liquid.
2/ Liquid is a federated (closed) network where you trust a handful of signers to operate the network and secure your LBTC (a Bitcoin-derived asset).
Liquid has no connection to Bitcoin other than using LBTC, i.e., no connection for consensus, smart contracts, security, etc.
The opportunity window for starting new layer-1 blockchains was in 2017-2018.
Some thoughts on the L1 landscape👇
1/ First, let’s separate Bitcoin (sound money) from smart contract platforms.
New money layers (e.g., Bitcoin forks) have failed miserably.
Bitcoin is the clear winner for sovereign money (with recent attempts from Ethereum to compete there.)
2/ Smart contract platforms, however, remain a rapidly growing and competitive market.
The opportunity window for starting new L1 blockchains for smart contracts was in 2017-2018. These platforms typically require 2-3 years of development before mainnet launch.
“When everyone zigs, Stacks zags.”
— Nick Grossman, USV
The popular opinion in crypto is that proof-of-stake is the future. Stacks recycles Bitcoin’s PoW and avoids PoS.
Why do we prefer PoW? Tweet thread👇
1/ First of all, intelligent people I respect, e.g., Silvio Micali (Algorand), are working on proof-of-stake, so clearly, I think it’s a design space worth exploring.
Given that enough smart people are already exploring PoS, I’m more interested in researching other designs.
2/ I don’t like slashing conditions in PoS. An event like a network partition (however rare that might be) can slash funds of honest nodes.
That’s why in Stacks, we had a design requirement not to have any slashing conditions.