StandWithUs continues its assault on academic freedom with a new Title VI lawsuit. This time, it is against Hunter College, with SWU claims has violated the civil rights of its Jewish students by allowing for the creation of an anti-Semitic atmosphere.
At issue is a May 2021 end-of-year class meeting on Zoom. During that class, a number of students changed their background pictures to the Palestinian flag and their Zoom names to "Free Palestine - Decolonize." You can read about it in SWU's complaint.
Some of the students then began to read a manifesto, which the professors on the call did nothing to prevent. Some students also made controversial comments in the chat, like about how Israel is a "white supremacist" state.
The complaint says that by not preventing these students from these actions/speech, the professors were sanctioning an anti-Semitic attack on the class's Jewish students. Furthermore, it says that at least one professor "followed suit" by changing their background and/or name.
Throughout the complaint, SWU leans heavily on the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism, which it mistakenly claims that federal agencies are required to utilize (in fact, they are only required to "consider" it). This is the definition that includes, as examples, anti-Israel speech.
The crux of the complaint is that since Jewish students consider their attachment to and identification with Israel to be fundamental to their faith, anti-Israel speech constitutes anti-Semitism. In other words, SWU is making precisely the argument that critics of IHRA warned.
As redress, SWU is seeking that Hunter adopt the IHRA definition, issue a statement affirming the centrality of Zionism to Jewish identity, mandate bias training and disciplinary measures reflecting that fact, and punish the students and faculty involved in the May 2021 incident.
And they may well get it. Other schools have capitulated before similar complaints.
Other countries are taking note. A group called the Hindu American Foundation filed a complaint against UPenn last month. It claimed that by hosting a conference called "Dismantling Global Hindutva," UPenn violated the civil rights of Hindu students.
As promised to @Noahpinion, I'm going to run through some of the recent work (2019-present) on the claim that university makes students more liberal and/or that faculty are responsible. I'm focusing on post-2018 because I cover the older research here. medium.com/arc-digital/no…
@Noahpinion For those uninterested in reading it, the gist of the above piece is: a) student ideological ID changes very little; b) attitudes change a bit; and c) what change does occur is due to peers, not profs.
With few exceptions, subsequent research bears that out. Here's a round-up.
@Noahpinion Rauf 2021: Network effects rule everything around me. Students rarely change their political ideology in college, but when they do, it is driven by their peer network's diversity (e.g. is it all lib? con?) and density (e.g. how tight knit is it?).
Among other things, this gets at a very important distinction in GOP attitudes toward racism and education. While most are comfortable teaching kids about historical racism, support falls off a cliff when it comes to teaching about present day racism.
You can see what I mean here. It’s reflected in many of the anti-CRT bills as well. For instance, Tennessee carved out an exception for discussions of *historical* oppression, but not contemporary oppression. Texas has something similar.
A lot of bills have drawn this type of distinction. Some also forbid teachers from “taking a side” on current events but permit it for past events, e.g. Arizona’s original draft (can’t recall if they kept that language in enrolled version).
A Virginia school board has ordered schools to begin removing "sexually explicit" books from high school libraries. Two board members have urged the district to burn them as well.
The vote was prompted by a complaint from a parent who had been scouring the high school library's app for LGBTQ+ literature. In the process, she found this book, which the publisher recommends for ages 15+.
One board member complained that by not pulling this and other books immediately, the school was basically saying that it "would rather have our kids reading gay pornography than about Christ."
I'm more sympathetic to TCW's concerns than I think NHJ is, but it does seem ludicrous to me how much more attention "CRT runs amok at school" gets compared to, say, this:
Reflexively dismissing all expressions of anxiety over "CRT" in schools as racism or a political ploy is a mistake, imho. But people come by that skepticism honestly.
That the DOJ ever found out about the Utah scandal is because of the leader of a local BLM chapter, by the way. Unfortunately, she had to flee the state last year due to threats to her safety over some social media posts.