DAOs need their “Silk Road” moment.

Will be good to establish baseline expectations for the naïvely optimistic, as well as the ignorant.

Every new technology faces a reckoning, when society begins to understand its potential danger.
Before COVID, it was easy to be laissez-faire about gain of function research.

Before Hiroshima & Nagasaki, the atomic bomb.

Before Chernobyl, nuclear power.

Before Tahrir Square, social media.

Before Silk Road, Bitcoin.

Before BitConnect, ICOs.
When people dismiss the hype around “web3” (NFTs, DAOs, DeFi), they’re dismissing technologies that don’t yet have their Silk Road moment

This is rational behavior

Once the other edge of the sword becomes apparent, markets usually correct & technologies go into a long “winter”
It doesn’t mean they are:

non-believers

don’t see the benefit of the tech

aren’t interested in a world with this tech

etc.
There is always plenty of time to adopt the tech after its downsides are known.

It was better to start a Internet company from 2005-2015 than in 1995-2000.

Controversial opinion, but I believe it will be better to build on web3 after its silk road moment.
We don’t know how long the “winter” will be after the tech’s Silk Road moment.

It’s irrational (hindsight bias + survivorship bias) to point to surviving companies.

Amazon survived the dotcom bust, but Amazon could very well have started in 2004 like Facebook did.
We still don’t know when the “winter” for nuclear power will end and when the tech will start getting adopted again, for instance.

It might be that web3 will never see wider adoption, and will go the way of the Semantic Web or Second Life.
But of course, this goes without saying that the irrationality and hype is also helpful.

Without irrational exuberance, we will not make progress, because the Silk Road moment won’t arrive.

“I am become death, destroyer of worlds” – words to remember as you build on web3.
Bull and bear market cycles in crypto are really driven by these underlying dynamics.

ICO scams led to the end of the last crypto boom. Terrorist DAOs or large-scale NFT grifts will likely precipitate the end of this cycle.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andric

Andric Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @astralwave

10 Nov
This is definitely something I’ve observed in tech startups.

Startups have so much leverage thanks to the power of software, and the presently high familiarity & penetration of mobile computing + the Web.

But most of this leverage is heavily misapplied & constrained by Capital.
Not talking about financial leverage here, of course, but intellectual leverage.

What a small insight & a little code can do to change lives at a large scale.

But if it doesn’t fit into the OKR & investment thesis, good luck trying to do it.

Procrustean Bed?
Why so much of this “small insight & little code” lives on the fringes of the Web in open source software, small indie shops, and early startups (before GPs’ investment theses corrupts product strategy).

It’s not “coordination headwinds”, it’s the Principal-Agent Problem.
Read 14 tweets
9 Nov
This “Gen Z is special” nonsense reminds me of the “Millennials are special” nonsense that I’d come across while growing up. Generational categories are arbitrary at best.

Every generation seems rebellious, naïve, “creative” etc when in fact it is just a product of youth.
So useless is the discourse about the “generations”, that you could look up stories about previous “generations”, when they were younger, and those descriptors would equally apply to the youth of today.
Such discourse is always (predictably) talked about in the same breath as – and misattributed to the influences of – the information technologies, media, and culture of the times.
Read 4 tweets
2 Nov
@m1guelpf Totally. What smart contracts let us do is the “adjacent possible” from Bitcoin and so everything feels like novel mutations that haven’t found their footing yet. Give it time and problems will emerge for which these technologies will be a perfect fit.
@m1guelpf “Paradigm shift” is a bit of a hopeful prediction though, I don’t think technological shifts happen so linearly and can be predicted. We only see these shifts in hindsight.

Before iPhone native apps gained ground, for instance, everyone thought HTML5 apps would be the future.
@m1guelpf Right now, trying out web3 tech to see how they fit different domains *should* be encouraged, that’s how the technology finds its legs.

The “paradigm shift” you speak of comes after, when this knowledge is already discovered, and we mine the depths of it.
Read 5 tweets
4 Oct
My take is that religion’s role is to provide the necessary metaphors in order for individuals to navigate complex situations where being “good” isn’t clear.

We now have science to help us navigate these complex situations, but what is considered “good” is still up for debate.
Each deity worshipped functions as a vehicle through which these metaphors are told.

Religions started out with tales featuring many deities. This has trended downwards, from polytheism to monotheism to religions without deity figures, to pop culture references, to memes.
I’m not sure why it’s trended downwards, but my take is that deities as characters in these metaphorical tales makes for an unstable configuration as to the internal consistency of each metaphor.

But personifying values helps them spread easily via oral traditions.
Read 13 tweets
4 Oct
It’s going to be more and more difficult for nation states to continue imposing taxes on their citizens, as competition for tax havens heat up, and as leaks like this erode public trust.

Nation states that rely on taxation to finance operations will eventually be outcompeted.
Nations don’t reproduce, of course, unlike living things, but their influence is memetic and their ability to coerce citizens is a function of their ability to coerce the wealthiest of the world.

And increasingly, both are at historically low numbers.
The absolute kicker might come when it’s not just difficult to coerce the wealthiest to pay taxes, but difficult to coerce anybody, because crypto makes tax avoidance easy as pie.
Read 11 tweets
2 Oct
Why is “taste” in something commonly framed as a linear scale?

i.e. “good taste”, “poor taste”

It’s a framing that I personally struggle with, for lack of a more fitting frame.

For example, you liked a show or a restaurant that has poor reviews. Do you have poor taste?
There is definitely a “better” ↔ “worse” dimension to taste, but perhaps a differrent dimension involves the person’s affinity to different tastes.

The people who didn’t like it are clearly more discerning than you about various aspects that you didn’t care about.
So back to the original example.

If you liked a show that had poor reviews, it doesn’t necessarily mean that you have poor taste. It could mean that you don’t value aspects of it that others value, and you can accept those aspects even if they are of poor taste.
Read 21 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(