To answer that question, we grounded our discussion in the @GRI_Secretariat Sustainability Context Principle as introduced in 2002 in the 2nd generation of Sustainability Reporting Guidelines.
"If one were to start with a blank slate to design an economic system that provides for comprehensive social and ecological sustainability and regeneration, would our current system be the outcome?
"Our current economic system, whose design requires extraction, exploitation, and colonisation, has long been generating:
--Ecological devastation — evidenced by climate chaos, biodiversity loss through the 6th mass extinction, and the breaching of Planetary Boundaries, and..."
"--Social destruction — centuries of entrenched racial and gender inequality, obscene wealth and power concentration, systemic human rights deprivations — including more enslavement now than when slavery was a legal institution, and genocide."
HUGE NEWS: The Impact Management Platform (a network of ALL major sustainability standard setters) launched today w/a website that embeds sustainability Thresholds & Allocations throughout (including a dedicated Landing Page.)
@r3dot0 This move comes after two decades of standard setters increasingly dropping the ball on integrating sustainability thresholds & allocations at the core of sustainability reporting standards/ guidelines.
So we welcome them finally picking up the ball and ALL now running with it!
@r3dot0 "At its launch today, the Impact Management Platform (IMP) unveiled a new website with a standalone page devoted to Thresholds and Allocations that explains just how to apply these necessary elements of sustainability measurement, management, and reporting.”
@aheadahead1 “There is a lot of bullshit about circular economy” says Chapter Author @hanswstegeman referring to companies like Ikea and H&M that are ultimately about fast fashion and planned obsolescence.
@BeatriceCrona@vgalaz@r3dot0 "Complex dynamics, such as threshold effects (tipping points) and strong interactions resulting in cascading effects, are all known drivers of systemic failure in any complex system. Yet
state-of-the-art risk analyses still do not adequately account
for them."
@BeatriceCrona@vgalaz@r3dot0 "Furthermore, most financial risk assessment still relies on historical data, and would underestimate or completely miss the potential for thresholds and cascading effects not previously experienced…"
@kmac "the taxonomy’s purpose … is to set a very high bar based on what scientists [say] is needed ... to avoid the worst effects of climate change. Instead of assessing sectors or companies as they are now, the taxonomy identifies … what...activities ... will lead to a safer planet"
@kmac This sets it apart from other frameworks, such as the @FSB_TCFD which seek to identify risks arising from climate change.
Or the sustainability reporting project being developed by the @IFRSFoundation, which hosts accounting standards used across the world."