Something usually overlooked for stablecoins like UST, alUSD, MIM or FRAX is that what matters the most for their success is people wanting to hold the stable.
If nobody is willing to hold them, that puts a cap on their growth and impairs long term viability.
A thread 👇
Let's take a look at alUSD, if someone wants to use alchemix they'll mint 100 alUSD, but they can't use that anywhere, so they'll swap it for USDT, which they can use freely.
This swap lowers the price of alUSD, slightly depegging it.
What keeps alUSD in peg is that someone that minted alUSD before will buy it back and burn it to repay their position at a discount. But this makes the system shrink by 100$, which combined with the 100$ growth, cancel themselves out: system can't grow
To grow there needs to be someone that is willing to hold these newly minted coins and absorb the supply expansion.
Atm alchemix is solving that by heavily incentivizing the alUSD curve pool: 97% all alUSD is held there. The people holding alUSD are farmers.
But this comes with two problems:
- It puts a cap on alchemix's growth
- It's not sustainable long term because it's based on ALCX inflation
Growth cap: With ALCX emissions they've attracted 600M in liquidity to the pool, but that's as much money people are willing to put there.
If alUSD expands, pool won't expand along with it (pool expansion is only linked to emissions), so alUSD will need to shrink (no growth).
Sustainability: for alchemix to work there needs to be alUSD holders, and these are atm only incentivized by farming, so alchemix needs to keep emissions high for it to continue working.
None of these concerns can be solved with protocol-owned liquidity, the only solution is to create organic demand for the stablecoin.
This can happen in two ways:
- Create demand through protocols integrations (eg: MIM in TIME)
- Convince people to hold it as a stablecoin
Integrations: Create opportunities that require your stablecoin so people hold it to participate in these.
UST is doing that by being the base of all protocols on terra (almost all pairs on terraswap are against UST, anchor uses it...)
MIM/FRAX are used on TIME and TEMPLE...
Stablecoin usage: Convince people that want to hold stablecoins (to lower volatility) to hold your stablecoin instead of others.
This is what MIM is doing by memeing DAI as heavily backed by USDC and presenting MIM as a decentralized alternative.
DAI has a massive headstart there, it's already integrated in all curve pools through 3crv, used in plenty of defi protocols, and people hold it as a decentralized stable.
But nothing is forever, it will be interesting to see how these new stables drive demand to themselves.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If you listen to CT it's easy to end up thinking that bitcoin is boomer tech and bitcoin defi is a meme.
However, this is just not true, bitcoin has an active set of people building on it, and a thriving ecosystem.
Here's a thread on it 👇
@hodlhodl is doing overcollateralized lending directly on top of bitcoin (very similar to compound/aave, but loans are peer-to-peer instead of pool-based), allowing anyone to borrow usd with bitcoin collateral. They also have a p2p bitcoin on/off-ramp market
@bisq_network is a decentralized market for p2p bitcoin/fiat trades. They have a token-based DAO that receives cashflows from the trading and handles governance over the system.
Celer has built an L2 rollup for farming that aggregates users movements and executes them together, saving on fees.
It works like a bus, if 3 people want to move their farming from AAVE to curve, celer aggregates that into a single tx (avoiding 2 txs) 👇
The way it works is that once you have deposited money on the rollup, you can decide in which protocol you want to farm with your money, then you can move your assets between these only paying rollup fees (much lower since only calldata needs to be sent to L1)
Then, every 6 hours, all the user changes are aggregated together and funds are moved from protocol to protocol in L1 (eg: if a person chooses to move 30$ from aave to curve and another wants to move 20$ from curve to aave, 10$ will be moved from aave to curve in 1 tx)
Idea: untraceable optimistic p2p gambling on bitcoin
a common issue for bitcoin gambling sites is that offramps like coinbase will blacklist all addresses that deposit/withdraw from these sites
my system solves this by making txs that look like regular transfers 👇
Bob and alice want to gamble on a coinflip, so they both pick a random number and send the hashed value to the other. Using these hashes both can generate an address with a taproot script that has two branches: one that uses a 2-of-2 multisig and one that verifies the coinflip
Then both alice and bob send their coins to that address and reveal their numbers. They can tell who's the winner so they can:
- cooperate and sign a multisig tx that sends money to the winner
- not cooperate, forcing a verification of the coinflip
I wonder if it may be easier to reach anti-nft artists by accepting their arguments instead of laughing them off or going against them, especially since a lot of these are actually true
- When you create NFTs that get sold you are increasing the fees paid to miners, which leads to an increase of energy spent today (if efficient market) or in the future (if max capacity is reached)
- Most NFTs are used for speculation, by creating NFTs you are enabling that