When I heard about plans for a series of new nuclear plants in France (first one ready around 2035), I remembered a similar announcement around 2005. Found it now! Image
By now, we were supposed to see one 1,600 MW nuclear power plant to be completed each year. The final decision was to be based on 3 years of experience with Flamanville 3, to be completed in 2012.
That article was published in December 2007, at the start of construction of Flamanville 3. The planned construction time was 4.5 years, but it still hasn't been completed 14 years later. web.archive.org/web/2014101402…
This 2007 quote from the EDF CEO didn't age well: "The start of the construction of the nuclear block is a major step in the creation of the EPR at Flamanville. ..
.. The experience, expertise and knowledge of the EDF teams, in particular their skill in the construction works and engineering, have allowed the construction to stick strictly to schedule."
He concluded with: "The success of the Flamanville site is essential and will benefit the whole French nuclear industry, since this technology is currently recognised as an innovative, safe and competitive solution throughout the world."
Ah, forgot to mention the source: "World Nuclear Association - World Nuclear News" world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/Const…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kees van der Leun

Kees van der Leun Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Sustainable2050

17 Oct
Current extremely high natural gas price in the Netherlands drives boom in anything that lowers consumption: hybrid heat pumps, insulation works, DIY materials. The right response! nos.nl/l/2402036
The best part of reducing your gas demand in times of scarcity is that every m³ saves reduces the price of the remaining m³, by cooling the market.
Somehow, you'd expect govt to be more vocal on the importance of energy conservation now, especially after just announcing a €3 billion handout to compensate everyone for the high energy prices.
Read 4 tweets
17 Oct
Watching a webinar on the Dutch hydrogen backbone: Hyway27. Govt budget 2022 has funding for it. streamxpert.nl/hyway27webinar… Image
Modeled hydrogen flows in 2030 over the backbone infrastructure in the Netherlands, with the planned 3-4 GW of electrolyzer capacity, in PJ/year.
10 PJ = 2.8 TWh = 8,000 tonnes of hydrogen. Image
The idea is to use existing gas pipelines, becoming available as the Groningen gas field has to ramp down production.
The repurposing costs are estimated at just €0.4 million per km (cleaning, preparing, valve replacement) vs over €3 million for a new pipeline. Image
Read 11 tweets
16 Oct
Listening #ClimateMiles podcast with climate scientist @HeleendeConinck. “World needs to go to net-zero emissions by 2050, but rich countries should be there before, e.g. 2040.
The Netherlands govt doesn’t (even) have a plan yet for net-zero by 2050.” theclimatemiles.nl/podcast/dag-5-…
Good point that we don’t have a plan yet for net-zero emissions from the Netherlands by 2050. Would be a good basis for exploring net-zero by 2040 too. Things will change in the meantime (solutions can also get cheaper than expected), but it’s good to know what it looks like.
Here’s TU/e’s @HeleendeConinck with Red Cross climate expert Maarten van Aalst: EU Green Deal and NL govt plans should have net-zero emissions target for 2040 (not 2050) nos.nl/l/2401896
Read 5 tweets
16 Oct
Solar carport at @UniUtrecht (with EV chargers) Image
.. and room for some more of those :) Image
It's a @WeDriveSolar system. Image
Read 4 tweets
6 Aug
Materials extracted and used globally, now two times the sustainable threshold. "Virtually all of this overshoot is being driven by excess consumption in high-income nations."
@jasonhickel in Less is More Image
That's 12 tonnes of material per year per person, and no doubt very unevenly distributed. A tonne of stuff on your doorstep for each person in your household, every month. More if you live in a rich country. Whoa.
Ah wait, there's the distribution already! Make that 28 tonnes of materials per person per year, for a high-income country... Image
Read 22 tweets
18 Jul
If you want to attack the #EUGreenDeal and #Fitfor55, focus on the cost and leave out the benefits. Even better: only look at investment costs and leave out annual (fossil fuel) cost savings too. We can see this recipe being applied in many places now.
Then: all of a sudden, care a lot about poor people, and frame them as the victims, even though #Fitfor55 has specific proposals to prevent that. By some mental gymnastics, pretend that said poor people have SUVs and travel by plane.
And of course, nurture the myth of the EC as a huge bureaucracy (in reality, it's one of the leanest civil services around), and suggest it can force the package on us (while in real life this has to be approved both by a parliament we chose and by our national governments).
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(