I was just at a Covid testing centre (accompanying somebody for a PCR test prior to a procedure).

I am shocked at the PPE used.

Staff wore gowns, plastic aprons, and magic gloves, as if dealing with a predominantly fomite-spread pathogen.
1/10
I've no real problem with the gowns and aprons - although they are likely a waste of money.

The gloves are worse than useless. They should be washing their hands with soap and water regularly (say, every hour); and using alcohol hand gel between patients.
2/10
Wearing gloves provides a false sense of security, and can reduce adherence to good hand-hygiene practice - you feel protected (although the gloves can spread fomites just as easily as bare hands can, if not gelled between patients).
3/10
What really shocked me, though, was the lack of droplet protection.

Perhaps they feel that because it's done outdoors (it was a drive-through centre) droplet protection is not necessary.
4/10
As the person being swabbed demonstrated, however, taking a throat swab often makes the patient gag and splutter, effectively firing large and small respiratory droplets at the person taking the swab, from inches away.

5/10
The swabber is therefore likely to be showered with droplets, at close range. This is precisely the sort of contact for which a higher quality mask (FFP2 at the very least; better still FFP2 ) AND eye protection should be worn.

6/10
I have banged on a lot (with very good reason) about people wearing a visor without a mask. (eg threadreaderapp.com/thread/1457652… )

This, however, is the sort of occasion when wearing a visor (with a high quality mask, of course) IS appropriate.

7/10
Indeed, a PAPR ( imperial.ac.uk/song-group/res… ) might provide optimal protection and comfort.

8/10
The failure to protect much-needed workers is horrifying.

We are planning to make vaccination mandatory for HCWs, but we can't even protect them properly with appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE).

9/10
All health sector trade unions - @TheBMA @theRCN @unisontheunion @unitetheunion etc - should be on the barricades about the ongoing lack of appropriate infection control advice and personal protective equipment for staff.

10/10
@threadreaderapp ps - @Ride4Truth pointed out that I forgot to mention… The HCWs were wearing poorly-fitting FRSMs (fluid resistant surgical masks) - which provide quite good source control (protect you from the wearer), but poor protection for the wearer cf FFP2, FFP3 or better respirators.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Peter English #FBPE

Peter English #FBPE Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @petermbenglish

9 Nov
1/ Following the Prime Minister's decision to be photographed, in Hexham Hospital, without a mask (despite everybody around him wearing one), I thought I'd look out the current guidance.
2/ (He clearly made a point of being filmed and photographed without a mask, and ensuring that those images were widely circulated…
3/ (…Whether this is a defiant dig at the mask-wearing rules he knows are necessary, but he hates, or another of his "dead cat" distraction ploys to draw attention away from gathering scandals, it was clearly deliberate.)
Read 13 tweets
8 Nov
1/ I just made a complaint to the BBC about the use of visors without masks in clips on Strictly Come Dancing this weekend.

Please add your complaint at bbc.co.uk/contact/compla…

The text of my complaint follows.
2/ "We have known since early 2020 that visors without masks are worse than useless at preventing Covid-19 transmission.

"Despite that, many people believe that they are effective, and wear them in the false belief that they are protecting themselves and/or others.
3/ "As Chair of the BMA Public Health Medicine Committee, I was closely involved with BMA messaging to try to correct this false belief - I can't seem to find the infographic we created on the BMA website any more, but see eg bma.org.uk/news-and-opini… .
Read 9 tweets
5 Nov
1/ People with a Great Barrington Declaration bent ("don't do anything to control Covid-19 and hang the consequences - who cares how many people will die...") are now attacking the rest of us for saying we should continue to do what we can to control the disease.
2/ "You want it to go on for ever", they say, echoing the prime minister's "if not now, when?" questions.

It's a complete straw man attack. We have never said that.
3/ There are some discussions about whether we should try to eradicate the virus completely; or just bring it down to controllable levels.

But nobody's saying we need to take precautions for ever.
Read 16 tweets
3 Nov
"Should single rooms be the default for NHS inpatients?" posits @mancunianmedic.

Obviously, it's not possible now, and could take several decades.

The current pandemic - and the previous flu pandemic - emphasised the need for more single rooms…
1/4

bmj.com/content/375/bm…
We needed more single rooms, ideally with negative pressure lobbies, to prevent transmission of airborne diseases.

Covid-19 won't be the last such pandemic.

So, if only for infection control purposes, we need more such rooms.

And yet…
2/4
I looked into the regulations during the flu pandemic.

Not only were there no standards for the number of respiratory infection safe rooms a hospital (even new-builds) should have, regulations on eg the minimum distance between beds were extremely weak or non-existent.
3/4
Read 4 tweets
31 Oct
@lisa_iannattone @greg_travis @fitterhappierAJ @COVIDforKids I'm not sure I understand this tweet.

It has long been policy to vaccinate eg HCWs against chickenpox if they are not immune and, using effectively a bigger dose of the same live-attenuated virus vaccine, to vaccinate older people to prevent shingles.
1/
@lisa_iannattone @greg_travis @fitterhappierAJ @COVIDforKids The live attenuated virus vaccine causes shingles much less often than wild chickenpox virus.

We now have a (more effective) subunit vaccine for shingles. It can't cause shingles.

It has long been argued that shingles is much more serious than chickenpox.…
2/
@lisa_iannattone @greg_travis @fitterhappierAJ @COVIDforKids … (Which is true.)

…And that "natural boosting" via exposure to children with chickenpox boosts immunity and thus prevents/delays shingles.
3/
Read 14 tweets
27 Oct
1/ The BMA @TheBMA has responded to the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill.

NOT IN MY NAME!

I fully agree with the BMA parliamentary brief re confidentiality; but not re increasing sentences.
2/ Apparently @TheBMA “supports the Bill’s intention to increase sentencing for those convicted of abusing an emergency worker”.

Prison is an extremely expensive way of making bad people worse. We should be calling for decreases in prison time, not increases.
3/ The problem is NOT the sentences people receive.

The problem is NOT the lack of offences in law under which to prosecute them.

The problem IS the failure to investigate and prosecute cases.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(