The Voynich Manuscript is worthless actually, he was never able to sell it. His widow sold it decades later for $25,000, less than 1/4 his asking price. The buyer was unable to resell it and donated it to Yale. It’s value is only in the fictitious mystery constructed around it
The legend of the manuscript was only ever a marketing ploy, which a perpetually cash strapped Voynich cooked up with amateur Roger Bacon scholar Robert Steele, a friend from the Savage Club, and Steele’s friend A.G. Little to coincide with the 700th anniversary of Bacon’s birth
19th century positivists and amateur scholars had, in the final decades of the century, constructed a highly distorted image of Roger Bacon as a martyr for science, ignoring the complexities of his thought to bolster their ideology of scientific and Comtean social progress
A massive international commemoration of Roger Bacon’s 700th birthday was organized in 1914, led by A.G. Little, Steele, and J.P. Gilson, who was Keeper of the Manuscripts at the British Museum, to triumphantly cement this strained positivist instrumentalization of Bacon forever
It’s poetic that the celebrations were interrupted by the onset of WWI. Immediately after the war, Voynich start trying to publicize and sell the “Bacon cipher manuscript” again, using the mentally ill speculations of UPenn philosophy professor William Newbold
By this time though, in the wake of WWI, the inflated enthusiasm surrounding the idealized positivist version of Roger Bacon had collapsed. Unbeknownst to Voynich dissatisfaction with amateur Bacon scholarship of the 19th century had been festering among scholars for years
The feverish claims of Newbold emerged as an opportunity to put the positivist reading of Bacon down for good, and serious scholars led by UChicago philologist John M. Manley demolished the Voynich-Newbold publicity campaign, shattering Voynich’s hopes for financial salvation
The providence which Voynich had tried to establish in his lecture before the Philadelphia College of Physicians, which linked the manuscript to from Rudolf II to Roger Bacon by way of John Dee, ridiculously exaggerated Bacon’s influence beyond all historical evidence
This narrative though isn’t just one about the manuscript, as a physical object, but transforms the “cipher codex” into a symbol of Science itself, which is passed like a torch down through the ages by way of a line of martyred visionaries in defiance of reactionary repression
Voynich has Dee fleeing to the continent to escape persecution for his scientific ideals as an angry mob burned his evil witchcraft books. In reality Dee fled with Albertus Laski to escape his creditors and conduct political intrigues in Poland. The angry mob story never happened
This positivist fairy tale of suppressed scientific ideals being heroically smuggled across centuries of superstition simultaneously serves not only as the manuscripts providence, but as historical propaganda in service of the pseudo-socialist values of late Victorian England
It is this ideological core which served as the center of gravity around which Voynich’s social circles turned, linking together the Russian nihilist-anarchist emigre community London with the milieu of Fabian socialism and the medieval modernism of the Arts and Crafts movement
These groups converged in the reading room of the British Museum, the storehouse of British imperial intelligence, where the knowledge acquired by a global network of diplomats and merchants and colonial administers was synthesized and organized into a miniature world of books
Here Arts and Crafts movement manuscript illuminators went to study the mediaeval masterpieces they based their work on. While simultaneously political exiles and agents of the government came to read up on the culture and history of politically tumultuous foreign nations
Here they mingled with the scholar-administrators of the British Empire’s institutional brain and the army of book sellers, book binders, and book printers which serviced it and fed it new knowledge at an exponential rate where the museum’s library doubled in size every 20 years
This is the true story of the Voynich Manuscript, which is less merely a story of a curious manuscript and a suspicious book dealer, but rather a tale of the vast ideological-historical constructing of the modern world deep in the bowels of Victorian intelligence networks
The Voynich Manuscript stands as an artifact of that history, stranded out of time, lost in the abyss of the war and revolutions of the 1910s, when the positivist nihilism of Britain’s social democratic imperialism collapsed in on itself and nearly took the world with it
Without this context it’s impossible to understand the Voynich Manuscript. This history is the true cipher encrypting its meaning.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with WYDNA Group

WYDNA Group Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @wydna00

4 Nov
I’m starting to wonder if Comenius didnt write the Rosicrucian manifestos. It seems increasingly clear to me that Rosicrucianism has a Hussite/Taborite core, that the concepts used trace back to Jan Hus and that Rosicrucian terminology is modified from phrases Hus used
The idea of the “invisible college” is right here: corpus mysticum universale eccles corcumex Christo et collegio predestinatorum veraciter constitutum

The universal mystical body, truly established by Christ and the college of the predestined.
The Temple of the Rose Cross is such a striking and original image, but what’s the source of that imagery? This militaristic, temple-tank on wheels? I can’t help but see some resemblance to the Hussite battle wagons. Am I crazy?
Read 9 tweets
4 Nov
All online political discourse, all the takes and owns, all has as its exclusive and ultimate aim, not the improvement of material conditions in reality, but the control of the cybernetic psychological warfare machine that forges reality. There’s nothing noble about participating
Demonstrating or amplifying performances of morally laudable opinions in service of this competition and the increasing of the share of influence possessed by people whose leveraging of that influence you believe you will materially benefit from does not make you a good person
It’s through the ability to manipulate or influence the appearance of public opinion consensus thar power is wielded, as the fictive construct of that consensus is the illegitimate ground of action by the liberal state. But this mechanism is inherently always fraudulent
Read 11 tweets
3 Nov
Never forget how the Papists persecuted the Church. The Catholic Church is the Anti-Christ. Popery is the denial of the reality of the Lord’s Universal Church.

Woodcuts from the Actes and Monuments of these Latter and Perillous Days aka Foxe's Book of Martyrs, 1563 ImageImageImageImage
See: King, John N. 2001. “‘The Light of Printing’: William Tyndale, John Foxe, John Day, and Early Modern Print Culture.” Renaissance Quarterly 54 (1): 52–85 ImageImage
Thinking about the martyrdom of Petrus Ramus at the hands of the Papists and crying Image
Read 4 tweets
3 Nov
Image
This is what I believe
Unity of Brethren
Read 4 tweets
3 Nov
I think I just permanently broke a lot of people’s brains on this site, where now they compulsively photoshop a picture of me at an apple orchard with my wife over and over again for all eternity into increasingly incoherent, disintegrating phantoms of my social media “brand”. ImageImageImageImage
It’s fascinating to be a part of.
My name is William Clark.
Read 7 tweets
3 Nov
Western critiques of liberalism are all inherently poisoned by the non-critical, ingrained liberal perspective of the supposed critics. Every online Leftist faction or clique seems unable to avoid framing their argument entirely in terms of their own immediate consumer experience
Liberalism is bad because of *minor social or consumer inconvenience* which means *nonsensical, extreme over generalization pathologizing liberalism into a hatred of fundamental dimensions of human experience*
“Liberals want kids to have to wear helmets when riding bikes. Therefore liberals *hate* childhood”
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(