I'm not normally a movie news guy, but I watched Shang-Chi (And the Legend of the Ten Rings) on the always reliable advice of my good friend @TalkinLadyShiva and I want to share my thoughts below.
SPOILERS abound.
Overall? Great movie. I enjoyed it very much. Loved the tone, it's a movie that takes itself seriously with excellent casting and great performances.
The mythos was built up well and I think all the changes made from the comic version were valid. I was never a huge fan of some of the Master of Kung-Fu elements so this works for me. The great Tony Leung is a well-rounded, human antagonist (but not really a villain)
Special shout-outs to Meng'er Zhang, Awkwafina and Ben Kingsley for forming the best little crew in an MCU movie since Guardians of the Galaxy.
One thing I really liked was that the tone was relatively sombre throughout. There wasn't a lot of quipping and levity during the serious or threatening scenes, instead it played the family tragedy of the story straight. Fantastic.
Being a comics nerd, I was unreasonably excited to see Razorfist was in this! I managed to keep myself unspoiled for the most part and that fight on the bus was great.
Couple of minor quibbles I had, I felt the ultimate battle was a little too much giant CGI stuff flying around which is a common MCU trope at this point, and some of the flashbacks felt a bit drawn out, but nothing that reduced my enjoyment.
So hey, let's see more of these. I'm hoping that despite the mid-credit scene we can still get to see more down-to-earth martial arts stuff with Shang-Chi in the future. And the Ten Rings thing whenever that happens.
I also noticed they had some nods to Iron Fist but I feel an MCU Iron Fist is redundant at this point because the MCU version of Shang-Chi pretty much has all of his distinctive traits already.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Alright, it's time we go back once more to the tumultuous 90s and finally witness the fate of Malibu Comics.
It's time for the one most of you were waiting for.
Time for the Ultraverse.
The usual disclaimer: Sensitive topics will be discussed and this thread will especially touch on some creators who have done very bad things. There's simply no way to skirt around them in the case of the Ultraverse, so please be careful.
Last time we explored how Malibu reached unprecedented success through their role as distributor of Image comics in 1992 and how the company tried to prepare themselves for when Image became truly independent by creating their own superhero setting with the Protectors.
Let's continue our journey through the many, MANY titles of Malibu comics with part two.
This time! The superheroes are here! Genesis! And the US comics market changes forever as we go back in time to 1992...
First off let me start with this: In the previous thread I received some INVALUABLE corrections on the ins and outs of early Malibu from people who WERE THERE, so a huge thanks to all of you including David Lawrence, Roland Mann and many others!
I have further subdivided the remainder of these threads because my original write-up of the years 1992-1994 was unreadable gibberish. Instead I will cover one side of Malibu's publishing at once, with nods to what else was going on at the same time. hopefully it will read better
Alright everyone the time has finally come. I've put this off for so long because of reasons I will soon get into but now it's time for us to talk about Malibu Comics.
WARNING: This thread will contain discussion of sexual violence, theft, racism and other sensitive topics.
Why did I put off this retrospective? Many reasons.
Several of the people involved in the history of Malibu are very sordid or have very troubled histories.
The publishing history is a tangled mess.
And other things!
But now, strap in as we dive into the history of Malibu - the scandals, the allegations, the lawsuits... and the comics.
Happy belated Wonder Woman day! Who would have thought that a seemingly random one-off story in All-Star Comics #8 would start the career of the first lady of superheroics? Thank you W.M. Marston and H.G. Peter, you did a bang-up job establishing a modern mythology.
It's also funny to me that good old Wertham claimed Wonder Woman was a terrifying character to boys whereas actual reader surveys DC did in the 40s indicated WW had a LOT of male readers. I assume even then there were more than a few readers who wanted Diana to tie them up...
Alright, I think the time has come for another topic. This time we tackle how comics publishers spread information to their readers before the internet and the inherent limitations therein.
Today we talk about handbooks.
Humans are creatures of order. We love to structure and process information into patterns we can understand and remember. Thus it is no surprise that reference texts date back as far as writing. The Egyptian book of the dead serves as a guidebook to the afterlife, discussing...
...the threats the soul must face to pass on to eternal bliss and naming and identifying hundreds of gods and spirits whose names and epithets must be memorized for the soul to gain passage. Essentially texts like these are early examples of humans charting the imaginary