Contrary to corporate media myth, Venezuela was not a model democracy nor a “prosperous nation” before Hugo Chávez. The country's massive oil wealth only enriched the local elite and foreign companies. This gross inequality was reversed with the Hydrocarbon Law on #13Nov, 2001.🧵
Chávez’ landmark Hydrocarbon Law increased gov’t oil royalties and imposed a 51% state stake in all joint ventures, thus ending foreign companies' decades-long reign over Venezuela’s oil resources and their siphoned-off profits.
For the first time since becoming an oil-exporting nation in the 1920s, the Venezuelan people benefited from oil income. Chávez used the resources to deliver wide-ranging social and economic programs, improving the lives of millions. It was known as “repaying the social debt.”
Just to name a few, Mission Robinson (which eradicated illiteracy in 2005) and the GMVV housing program (that has delivered over 3.7M homes to Venezuelan poor and working-class families), are among the programs created thanks to oil wealth redistribution.
Such social improvements were an affront to Washington’s corporate White House. No longer being able to loot Venezuela’s oil resources, a political and economic war was set in motion, evolving in its murderous nature until reaching the deadly sanctions program imposed today.
Since 2017, Washington has imposed wide-reaching sanctions against Venezuela’s oil industry, causing a drastic 1.5M barrels per day (bpd) fall in oil output and massive revenue losses of around $30B a year.
However, Venezuela’s sovereignty is not for sale. With gov’t and allied nations’ support, oil workers have spearheaded an uphill struggle to recover the oil sector amidst the US blockade.
Venezuelans will not surrender their resources to foreign interests.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Neocolonial plundered. Following the January 3 strikes and kidnapping of President Maduro, the Trump administration has moved in to impose control over Venezuelan resources, w/ Western conglomerates moving in under favorable conditions. Follow our thread/infographic
In recent weeks, the Venezuelan govt + National Assembly have fast-tracked reforms to attract foreign investment.Pro-business overhauls to hydrocarbon and mining laws slashed fiscal responsibilities, expanded concessions and removed the leading state role established under Chávez
Private corporations can now take over operations and sales, even if they are minority partners in joint ventures. The reforms, which followed years of devastating US economic sanctions, also established the possibility of taking disputes to international arbitration
Venezuelan Acting President Delcy Rodríguez gave a televised address earlier with some significant announcements on upcoming reforms. We'll have a report soon, and follow-up content once those reforms are in motion, but here's the gist of it (thread)
The most important announcement was an upcoming reform to the country's Labor Law. Approved in 2012, this is an absolute pillar of Chávez's legacy. But the private sector has upped complaints that present labor rights are too onerous and more flexibility is in order
As an aside, the Venezuelan gov't in recent years, under sanctions, has prioritized non-wage bonuses and kept wages frozen and devalued to almost nothing. In her speech, Rodríguez criticized past wage increases that were "irresponsible" and caused inflation. She announced an increase for May Day but it's likely to be bonuses, not salaries
The Venezuelan National Assembly approved a reform to the country’s Hydrocarbon Law in its first discussion. A second discussion and final vote are expected soon. This is arguably the country’s most important piece of legislation, so let’s look at what’s at stake 🧵🧵🧵
Some background: Venezuela’s present energy legislation was established under the Hugo Chávez govts. It was first approved in 2001 and later had some amendments. In essence, it reaffirmed the state’s sovereignty over natural resources and established control over the oil industry
Chávez’s reforms mandate that state oil company PDVSA hold majority stakes (in some cases at least 60%) and run oilfield operations. Taxes on oil profits were set 50%, royalties were raised (in some cases from 1%) to 30% across the board
The bar is always high (or low, rather), but every now and then the New York Times delivers an all-time masterpiece of journalistic dishonesty and pliant service to US imperialism. This is a piece about (imaginary ties) between Hezbollah and Venezuela: 🧵 archive.is/FPrMQ
First off, the US kidnapped/abducted Maduro. But US exceptionalism runs so deep that corporate stenographers believe Washington can just "seize" foreign leaders. But the relevant part here is that all we have here are claims by Rubio and US officials
This section is just empty fluff meant to malign Iran and Venezuela. Notice the nonsense of saying the countries are "bound by anti-American ideology" like it's some kind of bad taste in music, as opposed to the result of decades of imperialist attacks
A controversial afternoon (on Twitter) after the orangeman-in-chief lashed out at Colombia after the Petro government refused to accept repatriation flights with shackled migrants in military airplanes. Trump threatened tariffs and sanctions, Petro replied defiantly
Trump's disgusting (even by his standards) xenophobic and imperialist antics barely a week into his term have drawn fierce rebukes across the hemisphere. Honduran President Xiomara Castro called for an extraordinary summit in a few days
Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro also voice his support, telling his Colombian counterpart he can count on the "strength and experience" of the Venezuelan people and calling for further regional unity
🧵When it comes to reporting about Venezuela, there is no corporate outlet even remotely close to the level of dishonesty of the New York Times. Seriously, it's one piece of misrepresented bullsh*t after another. Follow this thread as we break it down
This is the piece:
The article is not to be taken seriously b/c it starts from a blatant lie. US "prodding" has nothing to do with Venezuela holding elections. It is dictated by the Constitution that they be held this year and they were never in doubt shorturl.at/LFusR
Anyone not high on Western exceptionalism would actually be ashamed of their government meddling in other countries' affairs. But alas, this is the NYT.
In corporate media spiel, "restoring democracy" just means a US puppet being back in the presidential palace