Lonerbox makes 2 unsupportable assertions. 1. Rittenhouse's reason for being there is unconnected to white nationalist attacks on BLM/the Left. 2. That Rittenhouse was pushed from larper to killer in the instant he was "attacked." He had already menaced protesters with his gun.
And these are the same transparently stupid and ahistorical arguments used by white nationalists/fascists/MAGA for the last five years. "How can the Proud Boys be white nationalists when they have Black members?" and so on.
If you need to decontextualize everything down to the two and a half minutes of footage starting with Rittenhouse running from the people he provoked, you're not making a good faith argument.
Also, this is the standard Lee Fang type argument that the actions of the Left necessitate the far right to defend themselves, or drive people to become extreme Right wingers. Lonerbox claims Rittenhouse only moves from larper to killer in the moment someone tried to disarm him.
That's why people are correct to call out lonerbox using the term larper in the first place, and to notice this has been a way that the "dirtbag" (centrist/Berniecrat/left wing of the Democratic Party) Left downplay the threat of rising global fascist movements.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Bottom line: Even if you want to strip away all political context, Rittenhouse running around pointing his gun at people provoked the first shooting incident. Everything that followed was people trying to disarm an active shooter. Provoking/causing means no self-defense claim.
And watching the video over and over of Rittenhouse pumping four shots into Rosenbaum, continuing to shoot as he crumples and even after he's down is very chilling. Kid thinks he's Seal Team Six killing al Qaeda. Doesn't look like self defense though.
Finished Ministry for the Future. It portrays a utopian outcome to a multi-tactic struggle against capitalist eco destruction. In a way the "shadow government" reminded me of Bakunin's "invisible pilots" similar to Leninist vanguardism, a cadre of professional revolutionaries.
Robinson also can't seem to imagine a world without nation states, and waged labor and money are all part of the future. But the book presents one possible route to a "revolutionary" outcome brought about by different forces than past revolutions. Interesting to think about
The book addresses the question of what to do about intransigent ruling class power that could prevent the needed steps to decarbonize society in time to save the planet. It seems realistic that some form of organized violence would be necessary to give the revolution leverage.
Nagle's latest centers nationalism as "anti-imperialist" + cites the "COSMOPOLITAN journalist class" shaking in their boots at the Hungarian nationalist Eden Tucker visited + Trump's "rebel nationalism" challenge to the "Open Society" (Soros/Jews/Liberalism) of the decaying West.
Nagle also blames cultural rot of once worthy empires, citing the teaching of "critical gender studies" art classes on Duchampn, + Lee Smith on the CIA giving viagra to warlords to rape boys, proving how out of touch elites are with _real_ Western values and white US workers.
The list of sources Nagle utilizes is 80% comically right wing. Malcom Kyeyune, The Spectator, Lee Smith (Tablet Mag), Phillip Cunliffe of Aufhebunga bunga writing for Spiked.
This guy Heartfield is an anti-masker Covid Denialist who's been demanding full capitalist reopening for almost a year, promotes ruling class development, Right Libertarianism, and Nigel Farage, but CRT is bad because it's an attack on the working class. Predictable. Absurd.
Anyone who's taught history knows curriculum/textbooks are not going to have your exact take on class analysis. Teachers supplement lessons with their own expertise. The post-left and Right hate the 1619 Project, but Marxists like Gerald Horne and Eric Foner generally like it.
Heartfield consistently promotes Thatcher's ownership scheme and capitalist market housing development as socialist. He's a Brexit xenophobe who pretends to be a defender of migrants. Just a sick fucker.
3 documentaries that add up to a damning picture of the Trump regime and the Right in the US.
1. The Brink:Steve Bannon's world tour organizing dictators and fascists into a coordinated global force. They failed electorally but the xenophobic program gained ground.
Q: Into the Storm: The three 8chan operators manipulate people to act on manufactured extreme Right conspiracies. They are presented as irony bro pranksters until you see the very real danger their tactics present on a large scale.
Totally Under Control: Trump sabotages the Covid response for political gain killing hundreds of thousands. Some of the insider interviews are extremely damning. Trump is unquestionably a mass murderer.
How to assimilate Marxism and make it serve reactionary, nationalist, bigoted, exclusionary, and anti-working class politics. A 9 part thread with pictures.
1. Dig up ideologies developed by shady ex-Leninists who’ve embraced Right-Libertarianism, nationalism, class collaboration, xenophobia, reformist capitalism, and use anti-”PC” rhetoric to base-build with reactionaries and far right parties, but pretend it’s Marxist.
2. Find convincing thought leaders to promote this ideology while hammering at the liberal left. Lump together cartoonish neoliberal left views with anarchists, libcoms, and all other socialists outside the group while bolstering far right politics as “working class” and normal.