ok i think i finally finished this exercise (3.4.2 in Tao’s Analysis). the “what, in general, can one say” wording is very sneaky and i initially thought that S = f^-1(f(S)) <=> f is injective. but it’s only => and not <=>. i think this is correct now. math heads am i right?
*well <= in the order i wrote them in the tweet. but the text on the picture should be right i think?
i think maybe there’s a stronger version that would work, like if for EVERY subset S out of X, S = f^−1(f(S)), then f can be shown to be injective?
and then maybe if for EVERY subset U of Y, f(f^−1(U)) = U, then i think f should be surjective
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
where do you hope to see yourself in five years? earnestly. (both professional and personal counts)
let me try to answer for myself..
i don’t want to work at a big company and i don’t want to work at a startup. i think this means i don’t want to “work” at all. as in, i want to be doing things, but i don’t want to be in an arrangement where i owe my time to someone on a regular basis.
have a new conspiracy theory that @RoamResearch has a weird scary logo and spinner because it is scared of mass adoption and subconsciously feels the need to repel those who might want to check it out
same energy (russians will know)
i feel like there is some obvious explanation for what it means that everybody understands but i’m too late to the game and at this point i’m too embarrassed to not know or vibe with it to find out
can’t wait for nfts to be green so that i can grift ethically
i’ll sell redux and buy a fukken house
the most annoying thing is that nfts make total sense to me. artificial scarcity is silly but there is no real content there. so it’s not like that wu-tang album. people who want to pay for air deserve to have their money redistributed. safe sane and consensual. just make it eco!
doing another Russian lyrics translation today! this song is called A Boy. it reminds me of Mr. Tambourine Man in a lot of ways, i wonder if you’ll notice the similarities too!
some thoughts on tailwind after using it for a few weeks on a project. i didn’t personally pick it (i use whatever’s already there) and it was a bit difficult to adjust to at first. however i actually really enjoy it now. here’s what i like/dislike
rampup time: the first week was absolutely brutal. i felt so slow. i couldn’t understand any of the abbreviations and had to always have tailwindcss.com open to look them up. luckily the docs are actually really good, and in a week i memorized the most common ones.
so why do i say i like it? there’s a few things. the more obvious ones:
- enforced consistency: spacing, colors, sizes, nice to have that be in one place.
- low-level: i already have components, don’t need “more involved” framework stuff
- tailwindcss.com/docs/flex taught me flex
turns out web development is very relatable to web developers. who woulda thunked
it’s actually really exciting. i haven’t worked on app/product/website code for about a year and it’s always so nice to just use react. i really do like it. the problem is,, i got too excited and now i have sleep deprivation