Good question. Answer: No.
We did not publish it.
We made sure it was in appropriate hands. (It is a matter of public record that I gave it to Jim Comey after he already had it.)
And we published a VERY cautious piece on @lawfareblog about it when it became public.
I have only had a chance to scan the indictment quickly, but on first glance, it appears to me carefully crafted to deal with the issues that @jshaub and I flagged in our article yesterday. lawfareblog.com/why-justice-de…
Specifically, note that the indictment does not take issue with any previous DOJ position with respect to the scope of executive privilege.
A word about each of them to begin my campaign: @BryceKlehm does an incredible Donald Trump impersonation, which we featured on the “After Trump” podcast.
@jacob_r_schulz has turned himself into an expert on French counterterrorism and knows a shocking amount about this history of prosecutions under the seditious conspiracy law.
The terms of the McCabe settlement seem, in first glance, highly favorable to McCabe. He got everything—even the cuff links—except the apology. Will have more to say on this after I’ve had a chance to study the settlement. nytimes.com/2021/10/14/us/…
One very clear take-away is that the department did not want David Bowdich or Rod Rosenstein or Candace Will or Jeff Sessions deposed.
Also note that DOJ is paying McCabe’s legal fees….
The former Director of National Intelligence and ambassador to Germany thinks my promotion of a young woman law student in public is "getting creepier by the day."