Instead of cowering defensively and screaming for purges of "wokeness," Dems should make Republicans pay a political price for their ugly anti-CRT tactics, the deeper aims they embody, and the degradations they’ve inflicted on our national life. My latest:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Important:

DCCC chair Sean Maloney tells me emphatically that in 2022, Dems will avoid the pitfall of non-engagement that cost them in VA.

“Children need to learn their history — all of it — without censorship or politics limiting what they can learn."

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
There's a lot of new reporting today on Dems worrying about the lack of an answer on CRT.

But their deliberations seem limited to *only* options for course correction that placate White voter concerns through defensive maneuvering.

There's another way:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
This idea that the "equity" debate is a slippery slope to Stalinism is nonsense.

In some of these discussions, equity is about ensuring real equality of opportunity, an ideal that's perfectly consistent with egalitarian liberalism.

w/@lionel_trolling

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
@lionel_trolling Laws banning CRT seem designed to get teachers to fear assigning the "wrong" readings could provoke feelings in students that must not be provoked.

As @DavidAFrench shows, this very provision is already being used to challenge educators:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Greg Sargent

Greg Sargent Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ThePlumLineGS

5 Nov
I call BS on the idea that Dem losses were caused by the BBB agenda straying too far left. This is entirely out of touch with how electoral politics works. And Biden *ran on* the BBB agenda. My response to that bad NYT editorial and other centrists:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
The @nytopinion editorial and some centrists are saying Dem losses are partly due to the overreaching ideological ambition of BBB and its alleged departure from Biden's 2020 platform.

Here's a thought experiment that, in my view, blows this idea up:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
@nytopinion It's just empirically the case that the current BBB agenda reflects what Biden ran on.

The scope of his agenda and its basic ideological ambition were undeniably communicated to voters.

I went back and looked at TV ads, speeches and campaign blueprints:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Read 4 tweets
3 Nov
I confess to being shocked and unsettled at how quickly the Dem coalition fractured after ousting Trump. This leads to an ugly possibility: For the third time, Dems may have only a two-year window to clean up a big national mess left by GOP rule.

My wrap:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Awful but true:

Republicans appear to be benefiting from changes Trump inflicted on our politics (educational polarization) without paying any price for his legacy of white nationalism, mass covid death, or trying to overthrow democracy.

w/@EricLevitz

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/… ImageImage
Democrats need a better response on CRT. They need to more frontally engage genuine parental concerns about curricula. But this cannot entail backing off holding Republicans accountable for the conflict and chaos their race-baiting demagogy has unleashed:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/… ImageImage
Read 5 tweets
1 Nov
NEWS:

Congressional Dems from Florida are ratcheting up pressure on the University of Florida to explain and reverse its decision to ban professors from testifying against the state's voting law.

Hearings are a possibility.

That and more in my latest:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
I asked the University of Florida to detail its rationale. A spox emailed me a new explanation.

It's not persuasive. And one of the professors tells me he repeatedly testified against the state of Florida in the past with the university's approval:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Now @RepDWStweets tells me she and other Florida Dems are signing a letter calling on the university to explain and reverse its decision.

She had a private talk with the university president. He couldn't explain.

Hearings are possible, she suggests:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Read 4 tweets
28 Oct
The White House's new framework is out:

*$555 billion on climate
*CTC extended a year
*Corporate and global min tax
*Universal pre-K
*Child care funding
*Expanded ACA subsidies, including Medicaid in red states

Tons of new reporting/analysis here:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
A few key nuggets. On taxes, we lost billionaires tax and hikes in corporate/top income rates.

BUT:

New surcharge on $5 million and up
Corporate/global minimum tax
Stock buyback tax
IRS/tax cheats

And we may be able to surmise Sinema might be on board:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
An important point:

Progressives are still insisting on a reconciliation bill text before any vote on infrastructure, a senior Dem aide tells me.

Predicts up to 50 progressives could vote no if leadership tries to hold an infrastructure vote:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Read 5 tweets
27 Oct
Elon Musk's absurd opposition to the billionaires tax shows exactly why we need it. Billionaires like him have benefited from policy choices that helped them build huge fortunes. One is the privileging of wealth, which this new tax would target. My latest:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
The billionaires tax is being widely treated as just a stopgap revenue raiser. But this is all wrong. It would fix flaws in the tax code that are themselves glaring problems. This would have real benefits beyond revenues.

I went through the details here:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/… ImageImage
Musk says with billionaires tax, govt will blow revenues, and once they "run out" they will "come for you."

But Musk benefited hugely from govt subsidies.

Investing in entrepreneurs like Musk = GOOD AND VISIONARY.

Investing in children = BAD TAKING:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/… ImageImage
Read 4 tweets
26 Oct
Awful: Manchin is again shrinking climate provisions. This could weaken US leadership at the global climate conference. This, even as a new AP poll finds 55% of Americans support action. The malapportioned Senate is the bane of our existence. My latest:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
A new quote from Manchin captures why we're in trouble.

"I’m totally out of sync with 48 other Democrats,” he said. "I’m just trying to survive in a very, very divided Congress in a very divided country."

This seems harmless. But it isn't.

Here's why.

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Yes, Manchin is smack in the middle of a "divided Congress."

But he is NOT smack in the middle of our "divided country."

He is both right of center of public opinion *and* able to decide all alone what the majority party passes.

That's the problem:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(