Let's start with who would CLEARLY benefit from an additional dose of vaccine NOW:
- Elderly
- Nursing home & long-term care facility residents
- Immunocompromised persons
- People who got a single J&J vaccination
2/ @MSNBC's @SRuhle is right: what do we mean by "indicated"?
This is what's driving much of the disagreement among scientists on whether additional doses of vaccine are needed.
3/ Are we trying to prevent severe disease, hospitalization, & death?
Are we ALSO trying to prevent ALL infections & transmission?
We have yet to agree on this, but we need to have a frank conversation about what we're trying to achieve.
4/ What CAN our vaccines & other tools accomplish?
And how do we deploy those tools to achieve our goals?
5/ And how do we craft a PUBLIC HEALTH strategy that will have POPULATION-LEVEL impact?
Our current vaccine booster free-for-all will inevitably recreate the same health disparities our healthcare system is designed to create over & over & over again:
2/ Almost 760K Americans have died from COVID to date.
If the risks of COVID had been clearly communicated early in the pandemic, there would certainly have been less resistance to mitigation measures like masking.
3/ People make decisions weighing risk and benefit.
But when they are misinformed about the risks, they can't make good decisions.
2/ It seems to me, whether you "believe" you have long COVID depends on whether you think you had COVID &/or whether you have an explanation for your symptoms or not.
3/ Reasons you might "believe" you had COVID include:
- symptoms consistent with COVID
- being exposed to someone with COVID
- living in an area going through a big COVID surge
- lab/radiology tests consistent with COVID
- PCR/antigen/serology test confirming SARS-CoV-2 infection
1/ Almost 910K kids between the ages of 5 & 11 have gotten a dose of COVID vaccine so far. There are 28M kids in that age group. That's just over 3% of kids 5-11.
2. Cherry-picking data is a common tactic used by disinformation-ists & science denial-ists. crankyuncle.com/a-history-of-f…
3/
3. Motivated reasoning is not good journalism. Picking experts (who, BTW, are almost all old white men)to support your preconceived notions is not good journalism.