Oren Cass Profile picture
Nov 15, 2021 13 tweets 9 min read Read on X
One of the major recent developments in American politics is the nasty divorce underway between the Republican Party and conservatives on one side and the Chamber of Commerce and big business on the other. What's causing the breakup? 🧵
One theory, advanced by @MichaelRStrain @AEI, is that American enterprise is the innocent victim here. Corporate leaders are merely:
(1) standing up for civic responsibility, and
(2) embracing cultural progressivism as a marketing tactic. bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
There's a contradiction here: corporations genuinely committed to civic responsibility would presumably shy away from promoting racially divisive ideology, delisting books, undermining democratically enacted laws, etc. The "responsibility" being exercised is rather selective...
Perhaps more importantly, the business behavior that agitates conservatives and damages the nation goes far beyond innocently standing up for values. Here are some of the issues that folks like @MichaelRStrain apparently have no problem with:
1. American corporations kowtow to Chinese censorship but gleefully criticize America. Hollywood rewrites scripts. Disney's ESPN axed coverage of Hong Kong. Nike declares itself "a brand that is of China and for China" while cancelling a shoe with the original American flag.
2. American corporations mistreat American workers. Companies like Disney make employees train their H1B-holding replacements. Amazon has badly broken HR systems that underpaid workers and denied them benefits. Efforts at union organizing face retaliation.
3. American corporations wield their economic power to undermine democratic processes, threatening secondary boycotts of businesses in states like Indiana, North Carolina, and Georgia to force repeal of duly enacted legislation.
4. American corporations abandon and offshore critical industries and technologies, weakening the nation's economy and national security. Intel outsourced chip production, Boeing offshored vital aerospace components, Google and others site AI research in Beijing.
5. American corporations use political criteria to censor conservative viewpoints. Amazon banned @EPPCdc president @RyanTAnd's book. Twitter and Facebook blocked news coverage of Hunter Biden just before the 2020 election.
6. American corporations promote racial polarization. Companies from Wal-Mart to AT&T to Raytheon "train" employees that America is a systemically racist society and instruct them to understand themselves and their relationships in terms of racial conflict.
7. American corporations gladly help China, but not America. Google refused to work with the U.S. DoD. McKinsey has a "public commitment to anti-racism" but advises Chinese state-owned enterprises. Tesla takes billions in U.S. subsidies and then shifts its export hub to Shanghai.
Long gone are the days of "what's good for our country is good for General Motors, and vice versa."

Big business routinely behaves in ways that damage the national interest and distort our democracy. Americans, conservative or otherwise, are rightly fed up and seeking remedies.
An Institute of American Enterprise should focus intently on bad big business behavior, and what it portends for the future of a well-functioning market democracy. What say you, @MichaelRStrain, might our @BizRoundtable friends have something to answer for as well?

[end]

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Oren Cass

Oren Cass Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @oren_cass

Oct 10
🧵Happy 25th Anniversary of granting permanent normal trade relations to China, for those few who still celebrate!

Today I'm counting down 10 classic examples of the failed consensus that led us off the cliff (h/t @AmerCompass Wrong All Along project). Image
#10... This [U.S.-China WTO] Agreement will also strengthen our ability to assure fair trade and to defend our agriculture and manufacturing base from import surges and unfair pricing.”
— Lael Brainard, Under Secretary of the Treasury, Clinton admin. (2000)
#9. “This reinforces all the things we want to encourage in China ... If we want to be part of changing that in China, then openness to telecommunications, openness to the Internet is a central piece of that. On the other hand, if we want to repudiate all of those who are working in that direction, repudiate all of those who have reached out in favor of markets, then not taking the PNTR step is the way to do that.”
— Martin Bailey, Chairman, Council of Economic Advisors, Clinton admin. (2000)
Read 13 tweets
Sep 5
1/ Fascinating drama playing out over the past 24 hours as the very good GAIN AI Act from @SenatorBanks comes under fire from @nvidia, which seems happy to shred its credibility for the sake of getting more AI chips into China. 🧵
2/ The Banks bill takes the sensible and modest approach of requiring US chipmakers to offer AI chips to American customers before selling them to China. So it's just blocking sales where more chips for the CCP directly means fewer for American firms.
theregister.com/2025/09/04/us_…
3/ Enter Nvidia, which is leveraging every ounce of influence with the administration to get its chips into China, even when there are American firms that want the chips, because it thinks it can gain a permanent toehold there (which never works and won't this time either). Image
Read 8 tweets
Jun 15
1/10 I say this out of respect, not disrespect, for Sohrab, whose analysis is always careful and thoughtful: This makes no sense at all. If the best effort at constructing a case from within an assumption of U.S. hegemony leaves logical holes this gaping, that era is truly over.
2/ First, Israel is conducting a campaign against a country that has orchestrated unending terrorism against it for decades and called for its destruction. It is not America's place to grant permission for such a campaign, to take responsibility for it, or to stand in its way.
3/ Not having responsibility for the campaign, the U.S. likewise does not have responsibility for the smoldering ruins that Israel may leave behind, no matter how much people rend their garments and complain. Yes, this requires a mindset change. So make it.
Read 10 tweets
May 27
1/ In an especially fun bout of market fundamentalism yesterday, @MattHennessey @WSJopinion argued that markets "are governed by the laws of economics the way the physical world is governed by the laws of gravity." I love this for two reasons...
wsj.com/opinion/jd-van…
2/ First, because it's disastrously inapt. Economics is nothing like physics. Its principles are not generated from repeatable experiments, nor do they hold consistently across space and time. Believing otherwise is a quite literal example of blind faith and fundamentalism.
3/ Second, though, it's perfect. Yes, the physical world is governed by the laws of gravity. But it is not governed only by the laws of gravity. Indeed, anyone who thought he could reliably predict the motion of bodies with knowledge only of gravity would be quite disappointed.
Read 5 tweets
Apr 14
1/ Today's Understanding America, You're So Vain, You Probably Think This Post Is About You, takes a look at the bizarre social media reaction to this @FrankLuntz tweet and what it says about the blinkered innumeracy and elitism of reindustrialization's skeptics.
2/ The Rorschach test here is one separating people who can think rationally and empathetically about the wide range of opportunities their fellow citizens might pursue, and those who lack that basic capacity. @scottlincicome apparently falls in bucket 2. Image
@scottlincicome 3/ See, if 25% of respondents say they’d prefer a factory job to their current job, that suggests an enormous opportunity for improvement in many lives. But @gtconway3d thinks only people who themselves see a factory job as their best option should support more factory jobs. Image
Read 6 tweets
Apr 6
Tough crowd, sore subject I guess. Deleting tweet and archiving it here. Only point I was trying to make is that I think comparative advantage mostly determines composition of trade, other factors drive level. I was curious how people would describe it. You didn't disappoint... Image
I particularly appreciated Alex's enthusiastic ALL CAPS confidence that comparative advantage explains the slave trade.
Thanks also to everyone who thinks richer countries always run deficits with poorer countries because the poorer countries can't afford to buy as much. I must have missed that chapter in Ricardo.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(