One of the major recent developments in American politics is the nasty divorce underway between the Republican Party and conservatives on one side and the Chamber of Commerce and big business on the other. What's causing the breakup? 🧵
One theory, advanced by @MichaelRStrain@AEI, is that American enterprise is the innocent victim here. Corporate leaders are merely: (1) standing up for civic responsibility, and (2) embracing cultural progressivism as a marketing tactic. bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
There's a contradiction here: corporations genuinely committed to civic responsibility would presumably shy away from promoting racially divisive ideology, delisting books, undermining democratically enacted laws, etc. The "responsibility" being exercised is rather selective...
Perhaps more importantly, the business behavior that agitates conservatives and damages the nation goes far beyond innocently standing up for values. Here are some of the issues that folks like @MichaelRStrain apparently have no problem with:
1. American corporations kowtow to Chinese censorship but gleefully criticize America. Hollywood rewrites scripts. Disney's ESPN axed coverage of Hong Kong. Nike declares itself "a brand that is of China and for China" while cancelling a shoe with the original American flag.
2. American corporations mistreat American workers. Companies like Disney make employees train their H1B-holding replacements. Amazon has badly broken HR systems that underpaid workers and denied them benefits. Efforts at union organizing face retaliation.
3. American corporations wield their economic power to undermine democratic processes, threatening secondary boycotts of businesses in states like Indiana, North Carolina, and Georgia to force repeal of duly enacted legislation.
4. American corporations abandon and offshore critical industries and technologies, weakening the nation's economy and national security. Intel outsourced chip production, Boeing offshored vital aerospace components, Google and others site AI research in Beijing.
5. American corporations use political criteria to censor conservative viewpoints. Amazon banned @EPPCdc president @RyanTAnd's book. Twitter and Facebook blocked news coverage of Hunter Biden just before the 2020 election.
6. American corporations promote racial polarization. Companies from Wal-Mart to AT&T to Raytheon "train" employees that America is a systemically racist society and instruct them to understand themselves and their relationships in terms of racial conflict.
7. American corporations gladly help China, but not America. Google refused to work with the U.S. DoD. McKinsey has a "public commitment to anti-racism" but advises Chinese state-owned enterprises. Tesla takes billions in U.S. subsidies and then shifts its export hub to Shanghai.
Long gone are the days of "what's good for our country is good for General Motors, and vice versa."
Big business routinely behaves in ways that damage the national interest and distort our democracy. Americans, conservative or otherwise, are rightly fed up and seeking remedies.
An Institute of American Enterprise should focus intently on bad big business behavior, and what it portends for the future of a well-functioning market democracy. What say you, @MichaelRStrain, might our @BizRoundtable friends have something to answer for as well?
[end]
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2/ The most important thing to recognize is the basic failure of reading comprehension. Is it rude to say they don't even understand the debate they're engaged in? Maybe. But I think it's nicer than concluding that they're lying.
3/ I wrote: "Trump’s proposal ... has drawn resounding mockery from economists, and, in turn, from the mainstream media."
Pino describes this as: "Cass misdirects the reader by suggesting the mainstream media and economists are in cahoots."
Very insightful @greg_ip @wsj look today at the economic battle within the GOP between old "pro-business libertarian wing" and "a growing contingent of conservatives skeptical of big business, ambivalent about tax cuts and vocally supportive of tariffs."
Three observations:
1. Ideas matter! @AmerCompass, a team of seven with a budget below $2M, can serve as a "counterweight" to the entire legacy establishment because we make actual arguments that happen to be right. 100x spent on ad hominems and brute ideological enforcement still loses ground.
@AmerCompass 2. The primary affiliation of every person quoted in the "pro-business libertarian wing" begins "former."
"Rubio and Vance might not be representative of GOP lawmakers, who are mostly free marketers, said Patrick Toomey..." who is no longer in the Senate.
1/ My long-but-worthwhile-read @nytimes is about the American political class's self-righteous detachment from the economic and social conditions of its nation.
This is the root cause of present instability and poses the most serious long-term threat to the Republic. 🧵
2/ My story starts with my own experience as domestic policy director on Mitt Romney's 2012 presidential campaign. Questions began trickling in from New Hampshire -- what's our plan on opioids? I am ashamed to say I did not know what they were. But I was no outlier...
3/ The infamous "bitter clinger" and “47 percent” comments by Obama and Romney captured the atmosphere in the ruling class well: delivered at private fund-raisers in San Francisco in 2008 and Boca Raton in 2012, evincing disdain for the voters who lived in between.
1/ Some important announcements at @AmerCompass, as we celebrate the absurd success our scrappy team has had reshaping the nation’s major policy debates and charting the course for conservative economics. You ain’t seen nothing yet… 🧵
2/ I’m moving into the role of chief economist. Much more research and writing ahead. Of note, a weekly must-read on economics, politics, and public policy: Understanding America. It launched today. Read and subscribe here: americancompass.org/welcome-to-und…
3/ @abigailrsal, with us since the beginning as comms director, is taking over as exec director. People are often amazed that our team of six with a budget of less than $2M looks from afar to be at least the equal of @AEI and @Heritage. That’s Abby. We are in good hands.
1/ The long-predicted fiscal crisis is here, now. Interest payments exceeding defense spending. Deficits above $2 trillion, suppressing growth and hollowing out our economy.
As we show @AmerCompass, there's only one answer here. Call it the 19-20 solution... 🧵
2/ What is the 19-20 solution? It's pretty easy to understand. The only way to bring our budget back to balance is to get taxes and spending back to between 19 and 20% of GDP. Read between the lines, you discover there's actually incredibly broad agreement on this:
3/ Biden's White House budget, with his wish list of tax increases, gets revenue up to 20% of GDP. Trump budget director @russvought, in his @amrenewctr budget with his very good wish list of spending cuts, gets spending down to 19% of GDP (before assuming higher GDP growth).
1/ The latest @AmerCompass podcast covers immigration.
@MarkSKrikorian cuts through the inane spin and arcane legalese to offer the clearest explanation I've heard of how the Biden admin created the border crisis and what it will take to fix it.
Here's what I learned:🧵
2/ The key starting point is to change your mental picture of "illegal immigration." The term "border crisis" conjures people sneaking across unguarded expanses of wilderness. That seems like it could be hard to stop! But mostly that's not what is happening.
3/ The data you see isn't usually people sneaking into the country. After all, if we didn't catch them, how would we count them? The data is for everybody we do catch, mostly because they are eagerly turning themselves in.