One of the major recent developments in American politics is the nasty divorce underway between the Republican Party and conservatives on one side and the Chamber of Commerce and big business on the other. What's causing the breakup? 🧵
One theory, advanced by @MichaelRStrain@AEI, is that American enterprise is the innocent victim here. Corporate leaders are merely: (1) standing up for civic responsibility, and (2) embracing cultural progressivism as a marketing tactic. bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
There's a contradiction here: corporations genuinely committed to civic responsibility would presumably shy away from promoting racially divisive ideology, delisting books, undermining democratically enacted laws, etc. The "responsibility" being exercised is rather selective...
Perhaps more importantly, the business behavior that agitates conservatives and damages the nation goes far beyond innocently standing up for values. Here are some of the issues that folks like @MichaelRStrain apparently have no problem with:
1. American corporations kowtow to Chinese censorship but gleefully criticize America. Hollywood rewrites scripts. Disney's ESPN axed coverage of Hong Kong. Nike declares itself "a brand that is of China and for China" while cancelling a shoe with the original American flag.
2. American corporations mistreat American workers. Companies like Disney make employees train their H1B-holding replacements. Amazon has badly broken HR systems that underpaid workers and denied them benefits. Efforts at union organizing face retaliation.
3. American corporations wield their economic power to undermine democratic processes, threatening secondary boycotts of businesses in states like Indiana, North Carolina, and Georgia to force repeal of duly enacted legislation.
4. American corporations abandon and offshore critical industries and technologies, weakening the nation's economy and national security. Intel outsourced chip production, Boeing offshored vital aerospace components, Google and others site AI research in Beijing.
5. American corporations use political criteria to censor conservative viewpoints. Amazon banned @EPPCdc president @RyanTAnd's book. Twitter and Facebook blocked news coverage of Hunter Biden just before the 2020 election.
6. American corporations promote racial polarization. Companies from Wal-Mart to AT&T to Raytheon "train" employees that America is a systemically racist society and instruct them to understand themselves and their relationships in terms of racial conflict.
7. American corporations gladly help China, but not America. Google refused to work with the U.S. DoD. McKinsey has a "public commitment to anti-racism" but advises Chinese state-owned enterprises. Tesla takes billions in U.S. subsidies and then shifts its export hub to Shanghai.
Long gone are the days of "what's good for our country is good for General Motors, and vice versa."
Big business routinely behaves in ways that damage the national interest and distort our democracy. Americans, conservative or otherwise, are rightly fed up and seeking remedies.
An Institute of American Enterprise should focus intently on bad big business behavior, and what it portends for the future of a well-functioning market democracy. What say you, @MichaelRStrain, might our @BizRoundtable friends have something to answer for as well?
[end]
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨🧵🚨 New survey from @AmerCompass, "Not What They Bargained For," paints a fascinating portrait of an American labor movement that has totally alienated the workers it purports to represent, thanks to its focus on political activism. Let's dive in... americancompass.org/essays/not-wha…
@AmerCompass 2/ Lower- and working-class Americans are much less likely than their middle- and upper-class counterparts to want politicians to speak favorably about labor unions. Not that they want to hear them speaking unfavorably. Most just don't care, or don't want to hear about it.
3/ Zoom in on the core that we call "potential union members" -- people working 30+ hours per week at a for-profit company -- and only 35% say they would vote for a union. They're almost as likely to say they would be undecided, or to say they would be opposed.
I've always been amused by lefties whining about funding after they've lost the substantive argument, but I guess we'll have get used to it from Conservative Inc. too. nationalreview.com/2021/08/does-a…
There are no coherent arguments about policy here, just lame formulations underscoring the lack of an actual point ("raises questions," "raises concerns," "Is that what is going on?").
At @AmerCompass, we've laid out a comprehensive case for the importance of labor to a well-functioning economy, limited government, and stronger civic institutions. If @MichaelWatsonDC disagrees, I'd of course welcome his counterarguments. americancompass.org/in-focus/seat-…
2/ The latest @AmerCompass Atlas takes a spin through the data on what private equity is up to. It's very good at offering the highest salaries and attracting the top business talent (who could otherwise be doing something more productive). americancompass.org/a-guide-to-pri…
3/ Private equity is not so good, unfortunately, at investing. 20 years ago, when it could acquire small companies at big discounts, it made money buying low and selling high. But once the discounts vanished, so did the returns. Big PE firms now make most of their money in fees.
If you want to understand the state of the market-fundamentalist right, I highly, highly recommend this short essay from Anne Rathbone Bradley in the new @ISI@ModAgeJournal symposium on the humane economy. isi.org/modern-age/hum…
Bradley's definition of a "humane economy" focuses on "greater output" and "greater choices, not just in coffee tables but for all goods and services that we need and want."
She acknowledges that "male wages did begin to decline in 1973," which she attributes in large part to women entering the labor force, and says, "this is a good thing for families" that "allows them greater choices."
And by the way, cutting taxes when they raise only 16% of GDP, while we spend more than 20%, just isn't going to happen. Shouldn't happen. Can't happen. Money's not free.
So if you're focused on tax cuts, that's really just a way of staying you're focused on nothing. Not great.
The new @AmerCompass collection begins from a simple premise: the information revolution of the past 30 years has brought about the most consequential technological transformation since the industrial revolution 200 years ago. 🧵
2/ An important thing to understand about the industrial revolution is that it actually made people pretty miserable for a pretty long time -- decades of stagnant to declining wages, declining health and life expectancy, people literally got shorter!
3/ Eventually, policymakers caught up, recognizing that the state needed to play a different role in an industrial economy than it had in an agrarian one. Indentured children in factories and mines were not the same as children working on the family farm.