An attempt is being made some Tower Hamlets businesses to divide the wider community in order to protect their commercial interests
This leaflet was delivered via a paid Royal Mail delivery organised by communications company based in Romford
Sent by 1st class mail just before 1/
Neighbourhood Plan referendum last week presumably to an area defined by Royal Mail, as sent to households not named individuals
As Royal Mail areas are quite large 1,000s of homes may have got it
But they are not allowed (by regulation) to spend more than £2,604 on campaign 2/
Will the anti-campaign report how much they spent to @TowerHamletsNow ?
Plus imprint on leaflet is also not fully compliant with electoral law & has been reported to the Council & Police (& I will report to the SET elections team later)
This raises a number of national issues 3/
The leaflet was designed to encourage voters to vote No to the Spitalfields Neighbourhood Plan
They almost succeeded
The yes vote in Spitalfields was 54% versus the 89% average yes vote in the 19 other referendums in London
Across the country there have been thousands of yes 4/
votes & a tiny handful of no votes (4 I am aware of for specific reasons)
This has been a very successful attempt to bring local people & businesses into the planning processes across the country
Except in Spitalfields
See here for background neighbourhoodplanning.org
5/
Presumably, some businesses in that area wanted less planning controls over property they own & decided to organise & fund an anti-campaign
But I suspect based on their leaflet they were ignorant of what a Neighbourhood Plan can or cannot do & the regulations
6/
Businesses in the area also had a vote last Thursday in the referendum as well as residents
70 businesses voted no, 18 yes, it will be interesting to see what types of businesses voted no
But majority of residents voted yes
When there is a split vote like this Council decides 7/
Council can decide to go with residents Yes vote or business No vote
This will happen via a vote of Councillors in January we think (will be mentioned tonight in a full Council meeting which is why I am doing these tweets as background)
The business lobby is now attacking
8/
individuals involved in the Neighbourhood Plan as they lost the residents vote
So Councillors will need to decide
Do they support democracy & the residents Yes vote
or
Support a campaign based on mis-information, £££, lies & division? 9/
The key issue is what were the planning policies businesses were against?
I suspect they did not read the Plan
Neighbourhood Plans add extra planning policies that affect future planning applications
Pics show key points in the Neighbourhood Plan here towerhamlets.gov.uk/Documents/Plan… 10/
So the Neighbourhood Plan would only impact a business that owned land in the Neighbourhood Plan area that it wanted to re-develop
Cannot be used to stop development, does not over ride existing Council planning policy but does add specific extra local policies
Which of 11/
these policies stop development?
It is in businesses long term financial interest to ensure the Spitalfields area is a nice area to live in & visit as that will bring more business to them even if it means some limited constraints on individual planning applications 12/
I will now detail why the leaflet is full of lies / misinformation /misunderstanding of the Neighbourhood Planning process
I added red numbers to the picture to explain each point towerhamlets.gov.uk/lgnl/planning_… 13/
Pt 1 - 'handful of people' this is the list of people actively involved in the Plan
Both the Council (Mayor John Biggs and Cabinet) & the Independent Examiner Jill Kingaby would have failed the Plan & stopped a referendum had they believed it was serving the interests of a few
14
Pt 2 - the Spitalfields plan area has different boundaries to the Spitalfields & Banglatown ward - it had a different name in order to make clear it covered a different area
Only the Boundary Commission & the Council can change ward names not Neighbourhood Plans
Ironically 15/
tonight the Council is looking at changing ward names but this came about because of recommendations from the Labour Party not a Neighbourhood Plan democracy.towerhamlets.gov.uk/documents/s194…
16/
Pt 3 - the borders only apply on a planning map & that map only applies to planning applications = cannot create any division except to developers
Many such planning borders already exist (see the Council Local Plan map)
These are largely invisible towerhamlets.gov.uk/Documents/Plan… 17/
Pt 4 - Is this why businesses paid for this leaflet? - it does add some extra planning policies to any business that wants to make major changes to the outside of its building or redevelop it
Has no impact on other small businesses except to provide more affordable workspace 18/
Pt 5 - this is an old lie & ignores the Local Infrastructure Fund consultation run by Tower Hamlets Council on where to spend 25% of any Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) £ received from developers talk.towerhamlets.gov.uk/lif
19/
The Neighbourhood Plan can make recommendations as well (see pic for their preferred projects) but ultimately Council Officers make the decisions not the Neighbourhood Plan
Most LIF £ spent on officer chosen projects so far not what residents want 20/
Pt 6 - a naked appeal to divide the community of the area to protect a few businesses commercial interests
And mostly incorrect - Neighbourhood Plans have limted powers within the planning system
Nothing to do with identity, rights, ability to influence etc etc 21/
Pt 7 Another lie by people who have a commercial interest who if they had actually bothered to read the Neighbourhood Plan would have seen it was in their long term business interest
This leaflet damages the community by creating fear and division through lies
22/
This raises a number of national issues for @luhc about the conduct of referendums when an anti-campaign (extremely rare) may have overspent spending limits, did not provide a clear imprint & provides misleading information
23/
Last point is what will the Council & Councillors now do in response?
They should make it clear they support the resident Yes vote & support the Spitalfields Neighbourhood Plan - and oppose any division @SpitalfieldsNPF@ELAdvertiser@EastEndEnquirer
24/
This @TheEconomist article is very strange, odd & not really based on much evidence
It also repeats various myths without evidence, misses the big issues, and therefore comes to the wrong conclusions
A 🧵on its inaccuracies
a. no mention of leasehold or commonhold at all ! 1/
b. it correctly says these buildings are expensive which is true but then talks about land value in England as one main reason why tall towers in big cities are expensive
Economist article in black, my comments in red
The main reason why tall towers are expensive is 2/
because construction is v expensive
As evidence this agreement that Westferry Printworks could only deliver 21% affordable housing on a big site agreed by the developer, Tower Hamlets Council & the GLA
Construction costs £630 m
v
Land value £28m
v
Taxes (CIL & s106) = £49 m 3/
The issues are more extensive than @PlanningMag article states
Councillors who made the decision to reject the resident's Yes vote in favour of the business No vote
Incorrectly, used the wrong business turnout % to suggest a higher proportion of businesses voted than residents 1/
Proportionally more residents voted than businesses
Councillors were also not officially told that:
Some of the business votes were illegal (three people voted more than twice)
49.5% of all the business vote came from a single office building
Cllrs also not told that there was
2/
an active Police investigation underway
"amid suspicions of a “possible conspiracy to subvert the referendum”, allegation of multiple voting, and claims that some business owners had exerted “undue influence” to sway the vote against the council’s plan" standard.co.uk/news/london/po…
3/
Problems with Homes of Multiple Occupation (HMO) & why a man died due to Council inaction
A man died earlier this month in a flat fire, had the Council been more proactive and responsive he might still be alive but an attempt to get them to do so in January 2021 was rejected 1/
18 people, primarily students and delivery couriers from Bangladesh, lived in a 2-bedroom former Council flat at the time of the fire, 22 beds were seen in the property including in the kitchen (mainly bunk beds)
2/
The owner had bought the leasehold flat in 2005 but the freeholder was Tower Hamlets Council and the managing agent Tower Hamlets Homes, their arm's length management agency
Neighbours made complaints about number of people & leaks from the bathroom in late 2021 and 2022
3/
New independent private primary school in Canary Wharf planning application
CW Group has applied to build a new 9-storey (thin but tall) nursery and primary school in the middle of Wood Wharf
402 pupils (150 nursery pupils and 252 primary school pupils) and 80 FTE staff 1/
Summary here constructing-london.com/wood-wharf-sch…
This would be a fee-paying school separate from the Mulberry Primary state school already built opposite this proposed new school so there would be 2 schools on site
2/
It will be run by inspiredlearninggroup.co.uk/about-us/about… and would be the 3rd private school in the area including River House & Faraday
I assume CW Group are behind the idea of building a new private school as will generate a long run income and be popular with some of their new residents
3/
Local Plan consultation response - why the Local Plan needs to change
1st round of consultations on the new Local Plan ended on Wednesday - 2nd round of consultation should be later this year after they publish the draft policies
I wrote a 13 page response to it raising some 1/
of some of my issues with it & planning here in general
Fundamentally the objective of recent London and Local Plans has been to push most development in Tower Hamlets to Aldgate, Aberfeldy, Isle of Dogs including Blackwall & other parts of Poplar 2/
Development in most of the rest of Tower Hamlets is discouraged even when they have better transport links and better infrastructure than the growth areas listed above 3/
I went to the @ConHome Defence & Security Conference today
Several questions from audience about what will happen in Ukraine
All those who answered said, they don't know the outcome
That assumes Britain has a passive role
Britain could determine the outcome by helping Ukraine 1/
More western weapons would put Ukraine in a stronger position to win
(in the same way western support helped USSR defeat Nazi Germany) @BWallaceMP mentioned 250 vehicles sent by Britain
But Ukrainians crowdfunded to buy 101 ex-British Army armoured
vehicles themselves
(Ukrainians in UK find this harder to do as UK donation websites won't allow similar campaigns in the UK to buy 'weapons')
That we had 101 retired armoured vehicles incl. ambulances ready to go but were on the open market for sale suggests Britain not as
3/