Lamenting with a friend that the majority of code we see in the wild is written by people who don't know the first thing about writing code.
Maybe we can muse on this? There is something interesting going on here.
Maybe we can muse on this? There is something interesting going on here.
I've seen two serious exceptions to the lament:
1. They are working with a technical coach.
2. They are in an ensemble
Otherwise, the best we can say most of the time is that it achieves the effect (often in the worst possible way).
1. They are working with a technical coach.
2. They are in an ensemble
Otherwise, the best we can say most of the time is that it achieves the effect (often in the worst possible way).
Otherwise, any basic understanding of software design, coupling, cohesion, software organization, OO or functional, etc is not evidenced.
If your company doesn't have (or, I suppose, rent) technical coaches, doesn't send developers to any craft training, and doesn't have mentorship programs, then you're probably seeing the same things we see.
But if you're finding that people (relatively new to sw dev) enter your company and develop design-sense, technique, quality code (internal and external) and work well with others....
PLEASE tell me what you're doing so well!
PLEASE tell me what you're doing so well!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
