Share this page!

Ari Cohn Profile picture
Twitter logo
17 Nov, 4 tweets, 2 min read
It's a good thing our constitution and laws take such decisions out of @DWStweets' hands.
🧐🧐🧐 Image
What does @DWStweets think about these? ImageImageImage
Whatever you think of its propriety, hyperbolic & violent imagery targeting government officials has a long history in this country--indeed since before it *was* this country.

The House can (and should) punish Gosar. But calling for him to be criminally prosecuted is stupid.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Ari Cohn

Ari Cohn Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AriCohn

Ari Cohn Profile picture
19 Nov
Just gonna get this out of the way:

Without commenting on the acquittal, the fact that a jury acquitted Rittenhouse does not mean it is defamatory to call him a "murderer," and it *especially* does not render any *past* statements defamatory.
2/ An acquital is just that: the government did not meet its burden of proof for a criminal conviction. It does not establish facts for all of time; it establishes whether the jury thought the government proved its case.
3/ Even if it *did* establish fact/truth, it would still be irrelevant to 99.99% of the claims people are yammering about. Why?

Because those statements were all made before the acquittal. Defamation requires fault. In Rittenhouse's case, he'll get public figure treatment
Read 6 tweets
Ari Cohn Profile picture
18 Nov
I remember when someone told me with a straight face that Clare Locke is a First Amendment lawyer.

I guess they didn't specify pro- or anti-...
*Libby Locke of Clare Locke
Lol I wonder what Libby thinks "refrain from further disseminating or publishing" means.

Read 4 tweets
Ari Cohn Profile picture
18 Nov
This is only "masterful" in its absurdity and failure to understand the law.

The hapless authors envision state AG tobacco-like lawsuits.

Unfortunately for them, different things are different, no matter how much elected showboaters we call "state AGs" might wish otherwise.
2/ They spend a bunch of time on mealy-mouthed hysterics about Haugen's testimony, without ever actually saying what the harms that are being caused are--and that's going to be pretty important, as different things are, again, different. Image
3/ But first they try to clear a first hurdle: Section 230.

They start out by recognizing that 230 immunizes platforms for liability on the basis of third-party content, and that 230 applies to algorithmic content suggestions.

So far so good! Image
Read 12 tweets
Ari Cohn Profile picture
9 Nov
I totally believe that this "university" invoking John Adams and featuring Sohrab Ahmari is deeply committed to the principles of free speech.
When @uaustinorg gets funding for a building, they will inevitably name it "Yes THAT Joe McCarthy Hall"
"It is vitally important that we create our own institution to escape these illiberal people who are hostile to free speech, but essential that we include people who are illiberal and hostile to free speech"
Read 6 tweets
Ari Cohn Profile picture
3 Nov
1/ I usually hesitate to crap on student newspaper articles, but this piece was actually written by the paper's advisor, @mdgiusti, who is the journalism *chair* and clearly not doing students any favors in the "make sure what you're writing isn't totally wrong" department.
2/ Off to a bad start, completely mangling the history. First of all, "everyone saw they were different?" No.

Second, Cubby Inc. v. Compuserve (one of the cases leading to 230) was actually about distributor liability, which has nothing to do with the decision to publish. Image
3/ Instead, the court in Cubby found that Compuserve was a distributor, and thus would have had to have actual or constructive knowledge of content's defamatory nature (and plaintiffs hadn't produced any such evidence) before liability could be imposed for speech on its service.
Read 17 tweets
Ari Cohn Profile picture
3 Nov
I regret to inform you that Josh Hammer has gotten no less (a) bad at writing, and (b) dumb.
Get this man some vegetables already, because he keeps making salad out of words.
I have a theory that if Josh Hammer doesn't use "telos" or "teleology" at least once in every single thing he writes, he would die.

It's really the only explanation.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @AriCohn has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @AriCohn!

Read all threads by @AriCohn

:(