Sergei Perfiliev 🇺🇦 Profile picture
Nov 17, 2021 20 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Looking at Nokia, I noticed there's a non-trivial open interest sitting at January 10-strike call:

327,961 contracts.

This is the largest OI across Nokia options.

With $NOK trading at $5.68, the option is quite deep OTM, and its gamma impact is muted...

Unless... Image
Unless $NOK rises and wakes up the sleeping beauty 🙂

How many shares would market makers need to buy to delta hedge this option?

Let's completely ignore any call overwriting and assume that OI is held long by investors and short by market-makers (a bold assumption, I know).
If dealers are short this option, they need to buy $NOK in order to delta hedge.

At the moment, this option's delta is ~0.05.

If (and only if) on 21 Jan 2022, $NOK closes just above $10, its delta will become 1.
Hence, market-makers will need to purchase 0.95 of delta, which is:

0.95 * 100 * $5.68 * 327,961 = $177 mill worth of Nokia shares.

Which is 31,156,295 shares (or rather ADRs).

Is that a lot?

Over the last few months, $NOK averaged around 15-20 million shares per day.
If $NOK moves to $10, the flow resulting from a 10-strike January call is equivalent to ~2 days trading volume.

But that was just one option.

$NOK has a substantial OI sitting across Jan 2022 and Jan 2023 expiries - let's take them into account.
What we're trying to find out is:

How much delta-hedging activity will Nokia trigger if it starts drifting north between now and January?

I will consider three scenarios - $NOK closes just above $7, $10 and $17 on 21 January 2022.
For each price target, we'll do the above back-of-the-envelope calculation.

Below are the results for Jan 2022 expiry: Image
And one for Jan 2023 expiry: Image
We can also throw in the puts - Jan 22 has the largest OI.

If puts were bought for protection, then dealers who sold them will buy $NOK if puts expire worthless: Image
So what does this tell us?

If Nokia closes just over $7 on 21 Jan, dealers will have to buy around 47 mill shares of $NOK between now and expiration.

Given the daily average volume of ~18 mill, this doesn't look that significant.
However, if Nokia reaches $10 per share over the next two months, market makers will need to purchase 98 million shares to delta hedge.

This is roughly 5-6 times the average daily volume.
It also represents a one-sided demand that has to meet an equivalent amount of supply.

If $NOK sellers are hard to find 'his Christmas season, then these buy orders will start pushing the price higher until someone gives in and sells.
Moreover, this analysis outlines the current exposure and doesn’t account for any new $NOK positions initiated between now and 21 of January.

Any additional calls or longs will add to the 98 mill shares bought by the market makers.
Calls purchases, specifically, will result in the dealers' immediate buying of delta, followed by additional rebalancing when the price moves around.

And $NOK options could be attractive, as implied volatility came down since Jan 2021 highs and sits around the lows for the year. Image
So is this enough to trigger a Gamma squeeze?

While the setup might look promising, unfortunately, a Gamma squeeze requires a feedback loop that usually begins with a catalyst.

A meaningful catalyst is earnings, but next time Nokia reports is 3 Feb 2022 - after January expiry.
And so far, I haven't found any other significant events that could serve as a trigger.
There are, however, some positive fundamental factors that could help push the stock higher:

• Nokia continues to roll out and expand its 5G business - it acquired many contracts with telecom providers around the world:

investorplace.com/2021/10/nok-st…
• $NOK trades at P/E of ~15x, compared to $SPX PE of ~25x. At 25x PE, $NOK price should be ~$9.

• Moreover, it recently reported solid earnings and a strong growth outlook, despite shortages in semiconductors:

barrons.com/articles/nokia…
Nonetheless, the price target of $10 that I assumed is still quite ambitious - it's double where we are now.

The last time $NOK trade >$10 was in 2011.

Fundamentally, it's unlikely that we'll get there in the next two months, but then... we have seen crazier things this year...
So what does everyone think?

Big deal or "probably nothing?"

I did open a VERY SMALL position in the 7-strike January call with money that I can lose comfortably.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sergei Perfiliev 🇺🇦

Sergei Perfiliev 🇺🇦 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @perfiliev

Dec 20, 2023
A short preview for my upcoming course 🔥

It's a self-paced online course that explores how financial markets work through stories, examples, charts and infographics, giving you enough context to make sure "it clicks."

Quick thread on what's inside each module 🧵👇 Image
The Financial Industry

• The difference between capital and financial markets.
• What does it mean, when someone works in DCM?
• Shareholders want to get diluted?
• The eternal battle: buy side vs sell side.
• You know what market makes do!
• But wtf investment banks do?Image
Fixed Income Markets

• Why nobody likes fixed income?
• What's a trillion dollars between good mates, right?
• The three sweetest words in financial markets.
• The problem of storing a billion dollars.
• Six mind-blowing facts about yields.
• The secrets of the yield curveImage
Read 10 tweets
Apr 5, 2023
Banking problem is not due to the spread between deposit accounts and money market funds, even though it's historically high.

Nor is it due to deposits running from banks into MMFs.

The issue is that funds leave the banking system because of what MMFs do with that capital.

1/ Image
WSJ reports that more than 40% of MMF assets are invested into Fed's reverse repo facility (RRP).

If capital ends with the Fed, it is dead - it has left the economy and the banking system.

Unlike a typical commercial bank, the Fed doesn't need to invest to offer a 4% return

2/
If RRP wasn't available, MMF wouldn't have a risk-free alternative to invest.

Withdrawn deposits would be invested in a range of money market products and T-Bills - in both cases eventually ending up as deposits at banks.

Instead the money is wired to Fed, where it stays.

3/
Read 4 tweets
Mar 30, 2023
The world runs on dollars.

It's not going away anytime soon - it's too ingrained into the world economy.

9 quick reasons for why it's difficult to replace the dollar despite what the FinTwit is telling you

🧵👇
#1 - In dollar we trust:

In fiat currency system, it's all about trust.

Trust that your currency has value.

Trust that it will be widely accepted.

Trust that the government will do the right thing to prevent the loss of value.
It took time for the dollar to earn it.

And it will take time for any other currency that wants to replace dollar to earn it too.

US dollar is backed up by powerful institutions, like the Federal Reserve, which work to ensure that trust is not compromised.
Read 12 tweets
Mar 25, 2023
Bank: Hey! Fed, help us!!!

Fed: Yo, what's up?

Bank: We need some cash, quick!

Fed: Hey, calm the fck down... What's the problem?
Bank: You told us in 2021 rates will be zero until like forever! So we loaded up on some crap mortgage bonds that pay peanuts.

Fed: Lol!

Bank: Don't fcking lol us! You hiked rates by 5% - all of our bond portfolio is deep underwater. Nobody wants that crap paying 1%!
Fed: So what?! Don't stress out! They'll payout... eventually. You even booked them as Held-To-Maturity bonds, just sit tight, you'll be fine...
Read 17 tweets
Mar 23, 2023
Right now, the spread between the Fed funds rate vs 2-year Treasury yield is the highest since 2008.

What does it mean?

Usually, when the 2-year rate falls below Fed funds, it's an indication that the Fed will cut rates soon.

To see why, think about this 👇 Image
Say you want to invest over the next two years. What would you choose?

1. Invest in a 2-year bond and get paid 3.9% p.a.

2. Invest into a daily Fed funds rate (5% atm) and roll the investment every day at whatever the Fed funds rate is at the time.
If you thought the Fed will raise interest rates such that an average Fed funds rate over the next 2 years would be >3.9%, then it's more attractive to invest with the Fed.

As rates go up, you'll be able to reinvest daily at a higher rate.
Read 6 tweets
Mar 22, 2023
Funny how before 2008, currency in circulation was the Fed's biggest liability.

There was no TGA at the Fed, no RRP facility and reserves were little and paid no interest.

Simpler times.
Following 2008, the Fed changed how it conducted monetary policy - it started paying interest on reserves and later launched reverse repo operations.

In a zero-rate environment, neither of these were expensive to service.
But now, not only has the Fed accumulated $3T of reserves and $2T of RRP, but it's also required to pay almost 5% of interest on them.

While the Fed is not a traditional back and can continue operating at a loss, it did make the system much more dependent on itself.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(