Thread by @plaforscience

Let's try imagining 1996:

AIDS is killing more than 1 million people/year, from all countries and ages
No vaccine or treatment at sight

Society believes, without any science but a bunch of prejudices, gays and drug addicts are the only vectors for the new desease

Cases and deaths look terrifying, with a scary unstoppable steep increase

Many famous death has rose awareness, going siguen with concern for desease and fear and untrust for the scapegoats

Something must be done!
Take action
Impose restrictions

Imagine a wicked wild campaign against them, promoting the idea that AIDS infected & drug users, just because they could have higher infection chances, therefore rising risk of them infecting others, must be isolated from society

That they're dangerous in bars, museums, at work

Let's remark were not even talking about positive, sick people, infectious about the lethal plague.
No.

We would just refer to GROUPS only SUSPICIOUS of higher infectivity risk

It would look like a Nazi monstrosity
An unbearable illegality

Because it WAS, and IS

We wouldn't accept even the idea of forcing the ALREADY CONFIRMED INFECTED, to identify themselves in anyway. Doing it with just suspicious of having greater risk would have sound III Reich.

Even as that risk was about an infection that equalled a death sentence at the time.

But it's OK in The Pandemic

It's OK to propose Nazi solutions AGAINST Deniers: Nazi stuff, Peter, like cancelling social life, job firing, lockdown

Just for a SLIGHTLY (if any, not even Covid Szienze dares to affirm vacuna avoids infections) risk reduction

Even under Covid luciferous orthodoxy, chance decrease for you to get infected reduces in immediate low amounts, in the range of changing a 0.0005% to 0.000425%

Covidlievers will say 100% to 5%, completely ignoring, in 1st term, chance of stomping with an infected is VERY LOW

With Spain's current Rt~1, for instance, it must be explained again that every infected will infect ONLY 1 person in his whole illness
One
Not everyone he finds
One, and that's it

We've 45K supposed active cases
Chances that you're next in 2 weeks are in THOUSANDTHS

Negligible

Risk reduction for get infected/infect are very low even under Covid Szienze, and it adds over extremely low previous infection chances

Back to sanity, Scientifical truth is telling us there's NO VISIBLE epidemic reduction associated to vaxing rates:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/artic…

If you add insignificant infection risk to ludicrous death chance for all ages <70, and to vaccine claimed effectivity in protecting from death, we end with a global NEGLIGIBLE change differential of dying because others being un/vaccinated.

That risk in the same logical scale of thinking any homosexual, any drug addict, were putting your life at risk just because they attending same bar, museum, workplace, as you.

Just disgusting panic cowardice, pumped by media turned into hate and fear fabrics

So, yes

Indeed defending restrictions for Unvaccinated/Covid Pass rejecters, claiming you respect their freedom no to vax/Pass is like concede someone the right to be gay, as long as you are gay locked at home, isolated from our Society of The Good Ones

https://twitter.com/plaforscience/status/1460893715518607364?t=Lhw8u5FKcK8skUktIEywyw&s=19

It's so concerning how much support there is for Restrictions that I'm shape and content are SO alike to the worst Humanity moments

Behold how this Italian old lady is banned from her diabetes check just for not bear the COVID pass

Covidian Passers are 🦆 ' #Heroes

It is sad and exhausting defending freedoms of those trying to erase yours, silly people unaware of the risk for their own rights

But it's MUCH worse to awake 1 day realising u are one of those who would have jailed gays to protect us from AIDS

Saving lives, u know

Choose side