Some things of value are (ideally) completely fungible like money, cryptocurrencies, and gold. Some are completely non-fungible like collectibles and houses. But there are also a lot of things that live in a semi-fungible middle like concert tickets and airplane tickets. 1/7
Blockchains started out with completely fungible assets and are now moving to cover non-fungible assets. But there's a huge market for assets in the squishy middle that is very poorly-served today. That is the market for digital rights. 2/7
Digital rights are rights to access particular content through some service that provides the content when needed. They include video games on services like Steam, books on systems like Kindle, and movies you've purchased on services like Netflix, Hulu, and Amazon Prime. 3/7
These are very badly handled today. Your rights are spread out over many services. And each right is tied to a particular service such that abandoning that service means abandoning that right. This isn't good for anyone. 4/7
It sucks for customers because if I decide to stop paying for Hulu, I lose all the movies I bought. Hulu might stop working with the devices I want to use it with or raise their rates, and they hold some of my rights captive. 5/7
It sucks for rights sellers too. If you have a hit movie, you have a window to get $21 for it when it's hot. But if buyers worry they'll switch streaming services before they want to see it again in a few years, they'll rent it instead. You lose the premium sales. 6/7
Markets that bring buyers and sellers together that aren't built for the convenience of either the buyers or the sellers are ripe for disruption. This may be a big part of the future of public blockchains as the digital rights market is massive and massively broken. 7/7

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 𝙳𝚊𝚟𝚒𝚍 𝚂𝚌𝚑𝚠𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚣

𝙳𝚊𝚟𝚒𝚍 𝚂𝚌𝚑𝚠𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚣 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JoelKatz

2 Nov
Anyone have any opinions of AngelList's syndicate system? My primary concern is that nobody has any significant incentive to do any due diligence because the investment from the lead tends to be either not disclosed or negligible.
angellist.com/syndicates
If only syndicate members have skin in the game and everyone else is playing with house money, where's the incentive to make the deal fair to syndicate members? And who is incentivized to do the thorough due diligence needed for such early stage investment? Am I wrong?
If I'm investing $10,000 and there's a lead whose investing $500,000 at the same terms I am, then I don't worry too much about having to check out the deal in full detail. But for $10K, I can't afford to do that and if nobody else can either, then it seems like a bad deal.
Read 4 tweets
30 Sep
1/ ICYMI my keynote (or two) at #ApexDevSummit, I want to highlight the exciting updates coming to the #XRPL 👇
2/ Today, XRPL devs can take advantage of the 1st implementation of Federated Sidechains – a toolkit or test lab to build your own blockchain while still enjoying the benefits and functionality of the #XRPL Mainnet. @MonkScott dives in here: bit.ly/3AWFVkB
3/ Sidechains make it easy for developers to customize the chain for their use cases, such as private networks, securities trading, DeFi...
Read 9 tweets
7 Jun
Today I introduced my vision for adding federated sidechains to the XRP Ledger which means a lot of things but essentially that anyone who wants to, can run a sidechain to the XRPL. 1/6 dev.to/ripplexdev/a-v…
The “federator” is software that acts as a bridge between at least two instances of the XRP Ledger, i.e. the XRPL mainnet and one or more sidechains. 2/6
This concept would allow each sidechain to have its own ledger and transactions, as well as a federation system that allows XRP and issued tokens (BTC, fiat, anything really) to move from one chain to another. 3/6
Read 6 tweets
24 Feb
Version 1.7.0 introduces key improvements that directly impact the network’s server operators, i.e. slashing memory usage by 50% to reduce server cost and improve server stability. 1/4
Memory is a critical (but scarce) resource (esp. w/ virtualization), short-term usage specifically is a huge pain-point for server operators. By reducing the amount required, small servers and large clusters alike benefit. 2/4 (More on this here: blog.ripplex.io/how-ripples-c-…)
Also newly introduced is forward ledger replay, which helps to save server time and bandwidth by "playing forward" transactions from a previously saved ledger until it catches up to the network, improving network stability. 3/4
Read 4 tweets
29 Jan
Investors in almost everything can reasonably expect their gains to average well above what they could get if they took no risk. A stock portfolio might average 6% or 8% a year, more than bonds or savings accounts. 1/6
But really, no investment can be rationally expected to do significantly better than any other once adjusted for risk. Why? Because if one was, it would get crowded and whatever value it could produce diluted until it was no longer significantly better. 2/6
This is why I opposed bailouts for travel companies throughout the pandemic. Their owners made good money for many years and in exchange they took the risk that a global event would devastate their industry. That's the deal. 3/6
Read 6 tweets
22 Jan
So we know exactly what happened with that bitcoin double spend transaction. It was a weird situation where an attempt was made to raise the fee on a transaction but the original transaction succeeded instead. 1/5
I do consider it a double spend. A valid transaction that someone could have seen as being confirmed was later orphaned by a conflicting transaction. But it's reasonable to not agree that's a double spend. 2/5
It's arguable whether it's an RBF instance or not. Someone could have relied on the first transaction, even if they were aware of RBF. But it was the low fee of the first transaction that allowed the second transaction to be relayed. 3/5
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(