#Collabrary 85: @JessKolopenuk's "Miskâsowin: Indigenous Science, Technology, and Society." #Collabrary = a project trying to change academic reading relations that tend to be extractive into something more reciprocal, humble, generous & accountable. 1/11 civiclaboratory.nl/2021/01/03/col…
"Miskâsowin: Indigenous Science, Technology, and Society" outlines a Ininiw/Cree theory of science, technology & society. The article has become a hallmark of Indigenous STS (I-STS) that shows how Indigenous theorizing-as-and-relationality is inextricable from academic work. 3/11
Plus, it's one of my favourite texts for writing against pan-Indigeneity. Yes, we have some things in common in broad strokes, but when you come from the stars your theory will necessarily be different than if you have other origins. @JessKolopenuk shows how this is so. 4/11
The piece starts with an overview of the relationship between science, technology and colonialism and a short intro to critical Indigenous theory. Super handy.Then it introduces Indigenous STS as something unique: 5/11
"Indigenous STS asks questions like: how do the logics of nature, exploration & discovery, & the scientific & political technologies that they bring to bear impact bodies, peoples, relationships, relatives, and spaces?" (5) 6/11
"How can we disturb assertions of assumed geopolitical dis/possession to territory and the exceptionalism of academic freedom to reconfigure balanced relationships with each other and with misewa (all that exists)?" (5) 7/11
"Miskâsowin is infinite action. It is in the remembering, the doing, the ongoing movement, not in the endpoint where one connects. [It is not] 'add methodology and stir,' but requires connecting w/ how one’s body is relationally generative w what they know..." (6-7) 8/11
"The purpose of tapwewin (speaking truth) is not to engage in adversarial argumentation per se like much academic critique does (ie speaking truth to power), but to truth-tell: to channel and share the accumulation of knowledge amassed through one’s myriad relations" (8) 9/11
These ideas are in tight relationship with the texts punchline: "Being in relation with the communities that I am a part of makes my theories. I theorize what matters because I am connected through relations that matter to me." (13) 10/11
I highly recommend spending some slow time with this text. It's a showing, not telling, kind of read so these are just teasers and tastes. I look forward to the conversation with @sprucehen_ and the I-STS reading group later today. Maarsii @JessKolopenuk 11/11
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
For their final assignment, my students have to work with ChatGPT to write an essay, and then they evaluate that essay in terms of the strength of the argument, its geographical approach, and its ability to meet course objectives. The students are nailing it. 1/6 @MUNGeog
They notice that the bots make arguments based on lots of Claims and Reasons, but no Evidence or Warrants (the thing that ties the evidence to the claims). Our course is built on this CREW (claim, reason, evidence, warrant) argument structure. 2/ teacherspayteachers.com/Product/Argume…
We also talk about citational politics in the course, and I loooove how students are choosing to cite the Bot. All give it authorship, some give it co-authorship with them, and some format it as "personal communication" in their bibliographies. I love their relational thinking 3/
I asked ChatGPT to write me a "no thanks" email to requests for my time and people are responding to it so much better than when I wrote it myself. That machine is better at emotional labour than I am (maybe it's the repetition)? The text in question:
"I hope this email finds you well. Thank you for the generous invitation. I am grateful for the invitation & appreciate the thought."...
"Unfortunately, I must decline. I’m not taking on any new projects or commitments for the foreseeable future so I can meet my existing commitments. Thank you again for your consideration. I wish you all the best for your [event] & hope you find brilliant & inspiring participants"
We aren't allowed to grade for "participation" in class here (which is good IMO), but I do have "colleague points" that changes the culture of the classroom, creates co-learning, and meets disability accommodations. Students can get one point for:
- Taking class notes: Every class, we have two notetakers who post their notes online.
- Timekeeping: I put the "Table of contents" for a class session up with the timing of each, and they help me stay paced & we always end on time
- participate in making a class contract for shared expectations for how we all want to be treated (this is facilitated in the first two classes)
- email an author of a text and share how it changed their thinking (based on @eatingpolitics assignment)