Back in the courtroom for Kleiman v. Wright. A doctor has been going through Dave Kleiman's medical records, explaining his medical issues. There were a lot. Kleiman had really bad pressure ulcers (aka bed sores) and couldn't sit or lay down for any extended period of time.
There were bacterial infections, hospitalizations. He was on painkillers. The reason this is being presented is that Wright has argued that Kleiman was too sick to have done any meaningful work on bitcoin.
In the records, nurses recorded that he was on the computer a lot and that he didn't elaborate on what he was doing, just said he was doing work. They also recorded that he watched movies on the laptop.
On cross-examination, Kleiman's team is pointing out that the doctor only reviewed medical records from Sept 2010 until 2013 and he can't opine on his abilities before that.
The doctor on the stand was not asked to evaluate Kleiman's mental capacity.
It's rough hearing about Dave Kleiman's medical issues. His former coworker and friend Kimon Andreou is on the stand now. They worked together at S-doc, where Kleiman was chief information security officer.
From a May 2011 text msg: "I cannot even go down the hall to get soda out of the soda machine…do you know how imprisoned/weak/useless that makes you feel especially if you deal with it for months upon months. I bet just a few weeks of that would drive a normal person insane."
Andreou testified that he was close with Dave Kleiman, that they worked together for several years and would see each other outside the office too. He visited him at the VA hospital during Dave's stays there.
He said Dave Kleiman was not a coder, that he had asked Andreou for help on some stuff at work because he didn't know how to program.
Andreou said Kleiman would tell him about papers he was writing, including one paper he worked on with Wright on overwriting data. He also said Kleiman had a thumb drive with encrypted files on him all the time, with his keys, attached to his wheelchair.
Andreou: "When I wrote this email I never expected it would be entered as evidence in court."

Let this be a lesson to everyone.
Carter Conrad, who worked with Kleiman at Computer Forensics LLC, just took the stand now. The other Computer Forensics managing partner, Patrick Paige, testified for the plaintiffs earlier in the case.
And now we've got accountant David Kuharcik, our first witness by Zoom. He was a friend of Dave's who also was his accountant and who later became the accountant for Computer Forensics.
We saw some tax returns, then there was sniping about privilege here. This testimony has to be done very carefully because there’s a professional privilege involved between an accountant and a client and Ira Kleiman hasn’t waived it on behalf of the estate.
Kuharcik will continue testifying tomorrow. But in the meantime Judge Bloom asked for the parties to give her more information on whether Ira waived privilege so she can determine the scope of what can be allowed tomorrow.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Carolina Bolado

Carolina Bolado Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CarolinaBolado

19 Nov
Dr. Ami Klin of the Marcus Autism Center in Georgia is on the stand now in Kleiman v. Wright, discussing his work in the autism field and his extensive evaluation of Craig Wright.
He said individuals with autism who also have high intellect often go undiagnosed, especially someone like Wright, who was in school 40 years ago, when people didn't know much about autism.
Klin said he was approached by Wright’s attorneys to evaluate Wright. He told them he doesn’t do expert witness work very frequently and that his opinion would go where the evidence went and would not just serve the case.
Read 21 tweets
17 Nov
The jury just walked back in to the courtroom in Kleiman v. Wright. Here's my story from yesterday: law360.com/articles/14411…
Before the jury came in, the attorneys discussed how they're definitely not going to be done presenting their cases by Tuesday, which was the initial plan. I think that's been pretty clear for a while.
Kleiman's team also asked to admit into evidence the Slack message that earned Wright a reprimand yesterday, as well as another one from several days ago that the plaintiffs say could be read to intimidate witness Jamie Wilson.
Read 42 tweets
15 Nov
Kleiman v. Wright is back up again today with Craig Wright still on the stand being questioned be Ira Kleiman's attorneys. We're not sure how long he'll still be on the stand after lunch; Kleiman's attorney said it depends on how lengthy Wright's answers are.
But direct examination could continue for the rest of the day. Wright's attorneys so far have indicated to the court that they don't plan to cross-examine him, but they reserve the right to change their mind of course.
This morning has been largely about W&K Info Defense's software IP, how much it was worth, where it was transferred, etc.
Read 21 tweets
10 Nov
Back in court today for Kleiman v. Wright, where Craig Wright will continue testifying. Here's @Law360's story about yesterday's proceedings: law360.com/articles/14394…
They haven't brought in the jury yet, as the parties are fighting over whether or not to introduce statements Wright has made in a Slack channel, some during the trial. Kleiman wants to show them to the jury, Wright's attorneys are fighting this.
Wright's attorney says had they known that the Slack channel was being monitored, they would've advised Wright that his statements there could be used against him. She also says that the request to introduce the statements is untimely.
Read 26 tweets
4 Nov
So a quick rundown of the Kleiman v. Wright trial today: it was cross-examination of Ira Kleiman all day.
Wright's attorneys went through a few topics, including Dave Kleiman's declining health, his personal finances (which were in very bad shape), and Ira's use of the devices he'd found in Dave's house
Wright's attorney showed jurors a slew of emails from 2008 before the bitcoin white paper was released in Oct in which Dave Kleiman told Wright and others that he was not doing well health-wise and was having trouble getting work done
Read 11 tweets
3 Nov
Ira Kleiman is on the stand now in the Kleiman v. Wright trial, telling jurors about his communications with Craig Wright as well as with the Australian Tax Office
He first reached out to Craig Wright in Feb. 2014 saying that he had heard his brother Dave had worked with Wright. "I just think it would be cool to know that David played a part in creating something so incredible."
Craig's replied in an email to Ira that Dave was involved in the bitcoin white paper. "He had the vistomail account, I had the gmx one."
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(