It’s (way past) time to scrutinise claims that oil from the #Cambo oil field will be used to meet domestic energy demand in the UK.
In short, it is overwhelmingly likely to be exported.
THREAD 🛢️🧵👇
Oil from Cambo is a heavy crude--sticky gloopy stuff--that's in v low demand. It's not high grade which is partly why it's taken 20+ yrs for the licence-holders to extract it. UK refineries don't buy a lot of Cambo-type oil & aren't set up to turn large amounts into anything...
...domestically useful. BUT let's be generous and assume that Cambo has the same chance as any other domestically-extracted oil of ending up in the UK supply chain.
78% of oil extracted in the UK is exported, as is 41% of output from UK oil refineries. All this translates into a 12.9% chance that oil from fields like Cambo goes into a UK refinery and ends up as a product that’s used in the UK.
That's a 12.9% chance that Cambo’s oil will (as the industry insists) satisfy domestic demand in the UK and a 87.1% chance that it's sold onto global markets.
Prefer this explained in diagram form? Here's a UK government flow chart that lays it all out ⬇️
In conclusion: of the 170 million barrels of oil produced from Cambo, 150 million will be exported (based on generous assumptions--the reality is the whole lot is likely to be exported).
/END
P.S. #StopCambo
Good morning! For those who remain unmoved by the decision yesterday against Shell because Shell can & almost certainly will appeal, I have a great story for you about how that worked out for the Dutch govt when it appealed in @urgenda's climate case... ft.com/content/340501…
Spoiler: it ended with emphatic judgments in the Hague Court of Appeal & Supreme Court upholding & expanding on earlier judgments, providing even more great fodder for those of us working to hold big polluters accountable for the climate crisis
Also, regardless of what happens next in court, the consequences of this case for the fossil fuel industry will be systemic and immediate. It will inspire other cases around the world, just as @urgenda did, & escalate the perception of risk among investors, ⬆️ cost of capital...
An absolutely historic decision from the Hague District Court against #Shell. Aside from the obvious headline emissions reduction order (45% by 2030 compared to 2019) there is so much to unpack in the court's reasoning. A few (personal) highlights 👇 theguardian.com/business/2021/…
Much like its decision in the climate case brought by @urgenda against the Dutch gov't, the court found that human rights obligations aren't directly enforceable against the defendant, but that they can be used to determine the standard of care that the defendant owes
In this instance, it's significant that the Court drew on voluntary or soft law principles like the UN Guiding Principles on Business & Human Rights to inform its expectations of Shell's conduct. A very welcome way to give those soft standards some real teeth.