If your opinion about a legal case would be different if the political ideologies of those involved were reversed and all other facts in evidence remained the same, then it's probably best not to pretend your position on the case has anything to do with the facts in evidence.
If the above tweet bothers you then your issue is with your own cognitive dissonance, not with me.
Awful lotta people telling on themselves here.
Interesting how many people interpreted this as a defense of Rittenhouse. If you don't think rightists would change their opinion of the case if the ideologies were reversed, you have a lot more faith in the intellectual integrity of rightists than I do.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Caitlin Johnstone ⏳

Caitlin Johnstone ⏳ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @caitoz

18 Nov
"You can criticize both Washington AND Beijing."

Okay. But you don't. Or if you do you don't criticize them proportionately to how bad they are. The US today is indisputably far more destructive than modern China; do you criticize it far more? Most westerners don't.
The US has killed millions and displaced tens of millions in its still-ongoing post-9/11 wars. It's circling the planet with hundreds of military bases and working to destroy any nation which disobeys it. Nothing China is doing comes anywhere near this level of evil.
Very few westerners apply this level of criticism to the US. Most westerners ignore US imperialism altogether while rending their garments about Hong Kong or Xinjiang or whatever they're instructed by the mass media to be upset about today.
Read 6 tweets
18 Nov
Criticize Beijing's Xinjiang policies all you want, but its deradicalization campaign was indisputably infinitely less draconian than the western "war on terror" which has killed millions and displaced tens of millions since 9/11.
And now it's winding down, while the US empire's "war on terror" has been continually expanding. These two things are not equal. They're not even comparable. The US and its allies are indisputably far, far worse.
All the western hand-wringing about Muslims in China is worse than hypocritical; it's a joke. The US empire pretending to care about Muslims is like Exxon-Mobil pretending to care about the environment.
Read 5 tweets
15 Nov
Gabbard turned out to be everything even the worst shitlibs said she'd be and it's fucking embarrassing.
Bunch of garden variety Republicans under this post explaining why Gabbard is actually good because her position aligns with theirs.
Why are people claiming the context of the video makes it better? It clearly doesn't. It's literally the exact same boring Karl Rove talking points people have been hearing on Fox News for decades.
Read 4 tweets
5 Nov
Few people get how fucked things are. It's not just that we're facing global disaster on multiple fronts and our electoral systems are rigged to prevent us from doing anything about it, it's that the public is being propagandized away from even WANTING to do anything about it.
Our abusive systems are so deeply locked in on so many levels that even people who see things kind of clearly can't really grasp how bad it is. They're still like oh okay they we need a new political party or a new voting strategy or whatever, and it just misses how bad it is.
We're so very, very sick and so very, very, VERY far from any kind of shift toward health and you look at what even the most awake people are talking about and it's often vapid sectarian bickering about nonsense that's light years from having any relevance to our current plight.
Read 6 tweets
4 Nov
Mass Media Hasten To Help Pentagon Exonerate Itself In Afghan Airstrike

"So the Pentagon literally did the 'we investigated ourselves and cleared ourselves of any wrongdoing' meme, and the mainstream press is passing that off as a real thing."
caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/mass-media-h…
Mass Media Hasten To Help Pentagon Exonerate Itself In Afghan Airstrike

"AP was told by their source, a senior defense official, that the report is 'independent', and then they passed that claim on to their readers as though it's an objective fact."
soundcloud.com/going_rogue/ma…
The mass media are full of headlines announcing that a "watchdog" has concluded in an "independent" investigation that US military personnel did nothing wrong in an August airstrike in Kabul which killed ten civilians and zero combatants.
apnews.com/article/afghan…
Read 9 tweets
3 Nov
The review was done by the Air Force Inspector General. How in the fuck is that a "watchdog"? Image
Literally the only time the word "watchdog" appears in the article is in the headline. An AP editor deliberately inserted it to convey this message to the overwhelming majority who only read headlines. Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(