Can you please let me know why you say everyone will catch delta? (Pic below)
This is an incorrect but commonly repeated idea. For example not everyone caught the 1918 flu. Nor measles (pre-vax). Or chickenpox, over a lifetime, now.
Thanks.
This part (pic) made no sense to me at all.
Can you describe what you mean by "reckless adults"? You are suggesting kids ought not pay for their transgressions, but who are they and what are they doing?
Or was this just loaded language?
Speaking of loaded language, you used the word "sleepwalk", suggesting that schools would just keep mask mandates without thinking. Has this been a concern anywhere? Or was this just as I suspect use of a term that would resonate with people who do not like masks?
You referred to the low rate of child hospitalization in two states. Can you explain why you chose those two states? Are they still so low?
How does the US current 0.2 / 100000 hospitalization rate for under 17s compare to other childhood diseases?
I could not find measles hospitalization, but could find pre-vax information of 500 deaths per year. No age restriction.
Compare with COVID, which killed more, just in the under 17s.
@ExtroSpecteur I presume he is saying airborne mitigations should be equally alongside touch or droplet.
No, there is no evidence for any. As I keep saying, but happy to say again, for thousands of years people flipflopped between "it's touch" and "it floats but generates in swamps because ...
@ExtroSpecteur ... they did not understand pathogens. Once they did, referring to respiratory illness, they simply assumed it was droplet because most infections can be traced to an infected having been near the index case. Droplet became an idea with Chapin in 1910, to explain why one needed..
@ExtroSpecteur ...to be close. However, first, their idea of droplet was not necessarily 2 metres. Their idea of airborne was many kilometers, so their discussion of close has to be understood in this context. Two, their investigations were crude, by the 30s air people like Wells
It's always funny to me that virologists get everything and transmission so wrong. I guess because they work with viruses they think they know everything about them. 🤷
The sad part is we would assume that because they work with viruses they know everything about them.
*everything about
Virologists don't really work on transmission. Maybe sometimes they spin a tub and flip some in the air or something. But they don't really know what's going on. And then the doctors know the biological clinical side of things but they don't work on transmission either.
Just remember the ladder of denial and elite panic myth means if you are hearing a 2 it's a 4. If a 4 it's a 6. If a 6 pack your bags. You'll never hear 8 and up the TV will just play static