πŸ”ƒ Positive feedback loops where πŸ“ˆ temp -> πŸ“ˆ GHG emissions ->πŸ“ˆ temp are the scariest part of climate change.

AND YET in nature, positive feedback loops are WAY less common than negative feedback loops.

Where are all the negative feedback loops we can pin our hopes on?
A few examples of positive feedback loops:

Arctic methane bomb theory

Wildfires: heat->wildfires->released CO2

Silicate-carbonate cycle: heat->rising sea levels-> less surface area for siliate weathering (natural CO2 sequestration)->more CO2->heat
A few examples of negative feedback loops:

More CO2 -> faster biomass growth on land and ocean -> CO2 sequestered
(seems tenuous b/c that C will be respired back out)

Hotter water -> less shellfish -> less CO2 release in shell construction -> more C sequestered in ocean
(grim)
What are other examples of major negative feedback loops?

β€’ β€’ β€’

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
γ€€

Keep Current with Judy Savitskaya

Judy Savitskaya Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @heyjudka

19 Oct
WHY VC? πŸ§ͺβž‘οΈπŸ“ˆ?

I get asked a lot why I chose to go from doing science to investing in science.

Here's my answer: a tale of two technologies. 🧡
Going into my PhD, I wanted to join the startup ecosystem in syn bio. If science was a 2D puzzle, commercializing added a 3rd dimension, an extra challenge -> extra fun.

At the time, two opposite, but highly influential stories were unfolding:

1) BiofuelsπŸ“‰
2) SolarπŸ“ˆ
1) BiofuelsπŸ“‰

Biofuels tech was improving quickly and the core technology basically worked! And yet, companies couldn't take off.

The science "worked", yet there were fundamental issues with unit economics and scale-up, terms that were completely new to me at the time.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(