Conservatives are eventually going to gave to grapple w/the fact that it’s not communists, but hyper-capitalists who are pushing and enabling our destructive cultural revolution.
Google & Blackrock are not communist. Bill Gates is not a communist. The celebrities wouldn’t know Marx if you brought him to breakfast. The foot soldiers of the revolution are people of relatively higher socioeconomic status who look w/undisguised contempt on those below them.
>what did capitalism mean by this?
Capitalism and communism BOTH reduce human beings to a labor commodity, to cogs in an economic machine whose value is measured in terms of work and consumption.
Imagine that Amazon continues to grow and eventually swallows all retail. It becomes so big that any disruptions cause huge economic dislocations. It’s “too big to fail,” meriting bailouts, but important enough to be strictly regulated. 1/2
Amazon will essentially have merged with government. Its army of lawyers meet daily with the government’s army of lawyers, making sure the company is “compliant” and working in “the national interest.” You could call it the Federal Logistics Department without losing meaning. 2/2
Imagine that the same thing happens in other industries. Big Tech becomes the Ministry of Information. Sure, there are sub-ministries - the Facebook Bureau, the Google Department, etc - but they are monopolies regulated - but also protected - by state power.
The end state of ungoverned capitalism is monopoly in every significant industry, each of which is too big to fail - that is, every industry run as a pseudo-government agency, as finance has been for many years. Where does that leave you? Well, in Moscow circa 1976 or so.
When people are reduced to economic units, their local preferences, customs & quirks (culture) become an impediment to the smooth flow capital & labor. Think what a pain it is for McDonalds that 1.2 billion Indians don’t eat beef. They’d eliminate Hinduism tomorrow if they could!
Mass production requires consumers with similar preferences. Local culture is an inefficiency. People who love their hometown or living near extended family are not eager to move for a new job, inhibiting the efficient deployment of “human capital.”
Capitalism needs consumers w/homogenous tastes (no culture) and workers with no local or family ties. It wants this globally, because borders disrupt the efficient flow of capital & labor. The Chamber of Commerce doesn’t push open borders out of concern for the Mexican poor.
The end state of the perfect capitalist system is an economy government by too-big-to-fail pseudo-government monopolies, and a homogenous population whose mobility is not inhibited by annoying sentimentality regarding family, locality, or tradition - in other words, communism.
A primary difference, of course, is that capitalism tends to get there w/the carrot, while communism gets there w/the stick. But they’re going to the same place because their theory of man, as primarily a consumer & labor unit, is the same.
But capitalism doesn’t have to use the carrot, and it knows how to use the stick. Simply resist the annihilation of your hometown, traditions, beliefs, or family structure too vigorously, and you’ll find out all about the stick.
None of this is a criticism of markets. Market price signals are necessary for an economy to function at all. But just as monarchism means rule by monarch, and communism means rule by the communist party, capitalism means rule by capital, and we should NOT be ruled by capital.
Clarity is important, lest counter-revolutionaries indulge the fantasy that things will change if only they elect people who aren’t communists, or get the schools to stop teaching a left wing curriculum.
This list assumes you know the History Channel version of the war, and are looking to understand it from different angles. None of these authors are dreaded revisionists, and buying these will not land you on whatever lists I'm now on. /1
1. Churchill, Hitler, and The Unnecessary War, by Pat Buchanan
In the early 20th century, Britain was 'the empire on which the sun never set'; by 1945, she was a 2nd-rate power in a world dominated by the US & USSR. This book documents the blunders that lost Britain her empire.
2. Human Smoke, by Nicholson Baker
This book consists of a series of chronologically-ordered snapshots and moments-in-time that manage to generate a narrative momentum that, by the end, somehow makes the war seem both inevitable and unavoidable. Highly recommended.
Time for a Churchill thread? Time for a Churchill thread. Let's do this.
Why I think Churchill was a chief villain of World War 2. /0
I know that sounds like hyperbole. Churchill didn’t order the most deaths, oversee the most atrocities, or commit the worst crimes. But most of those crimes could not have been committed if the war had not happened, and Churchill was the leader most intent on making it happen. /1
You'll think, "But Darryl, everyone knows the war started after Germany invaded Poland, + Austria & Czechoslovakia before that. It could have been prevented if only people had listened to Churchill , and taken a tougher line against Hitler." And you might be right. Sort of. /2
Because they insist on the primacy of words, and reject as irrational the idea that both are happier when the man sees his job is not to achieve a meeting of minds, but to manage her emotional state, keep her calm, content, optimistic… less like your bro, more like your horse.
She won’t like hearing that, so don’t say it to her. But make that shift and thank me later.
Yes, but she has to learn to treat you like a child in some ways, too, like “aw, he thinks the sounds coming out of his mouth mean things and are important…”
This is a list of science/engineering achievements, but also a description of capital flows. The way to make big $ in the 2000s was through finance and tech, and too many of our best brains were wasted creating CDOs and dick pic apps.
Add in that labor & regulatory arbitrage provided industry w/an easy way to drive up the bottom line without the risky business of innovation, and you get what we have now, secular stagnation or whatever.
In the most recent MartyrMade Substack essay on slavery and the leadup to the Civil War, I describe some of the bizarre practices of societies encountered by Europeans during the Age of Exploration, to try to put the European response in perspective.
Thread.
J.G Frazer, in his book, The Golden Bough, summarizes an Aztec ritual dedicated to the Maize Goddess, Chicomecohuatl. A young girl was chosen to play the role of the goddess, and was paraded around town to be worshipped by the people. Then came the festival's climax:
The conquistadores were hard men, accustomed to violence, but what they found in Mexico shook them to their core.
After the ‘93 Oslo Accords made it increasingly difficult to legally establish settlements in the West Bank, settlers began to employ increasingly sophisticated means to work around Israeli law.
This is Antenna Hill in the West Bank:
Settlements continued to expand, with right wing Israeli politicians helping to to skirt Israel’s own laws. Despite being there illegally, the govt decided it was necessary to construct a cell phone tower on a nearby hilltop to fill a blind spot at a bend on the highway.
It was determined to be a security need, since it was unacceptable that Israelis might be caught in a bad situation w/o cell service. The hilltop, owned by Palestinian farmers, was seized and connected to the grid and water supply to facilitate construction.