Peer reviewed October 2021 paper by Russian physicists suggests impact of CO2 on global warming is grossly exaggerated in climate models due to error in analyse. They claim doubling CO2 leads to average global warming of only 0.33 degrees C. Observed warming is from water vapor.
I’m not a physicist, but this seems like a big deal. What these Russian scientists say is missing from most climate scientists’ analyses is the recognition that an emitter of infrared radiation such as CO2 is also an absorber. Including that math into the current models
significantly reduces the effect of CO2 on warming, they say.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kingmaker - Big IF! (True)

Kingmaker - Big IF! (True) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KingMakerFT

21 Nov
@jsolomonReports covers last week’s FBI and local police raids under search warrants in Mesa County, CO, of the homes of former County Clerk, Tina Peters, and other women:
According to copies of the warrants left with the subjects, the alleged crimes being investigated were tampering with election equipment, which would be a state law offense, and wire fraud, a federal crime. The use of the wire fraud state raises a number of important questions
and could evidence an effort by the DOJ and FBI to target 2020 “election deniers.” According to Solomon’s reporting, backed up by public interviews if Ms. Peters, this investigation arises from Ms Peters’ efforts last May to create a forensic backup of an election server in her
Read 12 tweets
11 Nov
Here is Paul Sperry’s latest article on the Durham probe. It’s well worth a read, containing @SergeiMillian ‘s side of the story about how he was framed. Millian points the finger primarily at Glenn Simpson for coming up with the theory that Millian was a Russian spy and the
person closest to Trump who participated in the conspiracy with Russia. Sperry correctly points out that Danchenko and Steele fabricated out of whole cloth that Millisn was the key source for the most damning elements of the dossier immediately after Simpson and Nellie Ohr
researched Millian. The false story was then fed to the FBI through Brice Ohr by Simpson and Steele,and Simpson fed it to the WaPo and WSJ, which published the false story framing Millian. To this day there has been no retraction. Sperry writes that Ohr is now a target of Durham
Read 7 tweets
9 Nov
Yesterday I outlined how Durham’s strategy appears to be the following: Take down a pre-election conspiracy of Clinton acolytes, lawyers, investigative firms, and other private persons, then move to the post-election phase, targeting those inside the govt who either joined the
original conspiracy or formed a second one to take down the president and/or coverup what had gone on before. I explained that no prosecutor worth his salt would let the criminal FISA abuse go unpunished, but the key date would be post-election, when the second renewal of the
Carter Page warrant was obtained- after the FBI interviewed Danchenko and learned the dossier was nothing bu rumors and bar talk. The coverup of what they learned from Danchenko, notwithstanding his lies, extended well into 2018, during the Mueller investigation. @zerohedge has
Read 12 tweets
8 Nov
In a thread begun by @ProfMJCleveland someone asked the $64,000 question: Ehy did Danchenko lie, and repeatedly so, about a complete fabrication- that his sole source for the post damning parts of the dossier was @SergeiMillian , a person Danchenko never met, never talked to over
the phone, and never communicated with in writing about any of the things in the dossier? Under his immunity deal, all Danchenko had to do to stay out of jail was to tell the truth. Instead, according to Steele’s testimony in the UK, Danchenko lied to Steele, telling Steele he
met personally with Millian three separate times. One can imagine several reasons Danchenko stuck with his lie. One could be he really did get one or more phone calls from someone, not Millian, telling Iggy to report certain facts to Steele. But for some reason he had to protect
Read 7 tweets
6 Nov
@KimStrassel has a good editorial in the WSJ on the Clinton Dossier scandal. She explores the role of Chuck Dolan in creating some of the dossier. Unfortunately, she does not address an even bigger part of the scandal: the framing of Sergei Millian as Source D and Source E, the
person allegedly behind the parts of the dossier most damning to Trump, which the FBI included almost verbatim in the FISA application for a warrant to spy on Carter Page. The dossier reports that those damning allegations of a conspiracy between Trump and Russia, complete with
details aplenty, had but one source: a native Russian very close to Trump and his organization. Danchenko told the FBI that person was Millian. The indictment, backed by email evidence, charges Danchenko with lying. Millian was framed. Left unanswered is where did Danchenko get
Read 5 tweets
5 Nov
On this DOJ war against Project Veritas, in the below video O’Keefe fails to mention that the diary in question found its way onto the internet last year before the election. Most of it wasn’t newsworthy, just things that could be embarrassing to Ashley Biden. My recollection
is that there were a couple of pages that could have been embarrassing to Joe or his sons, but there was nothing on its face to authenticate the diary. But I also recall someone posting something claiming that Ashley herself admitted it was hers. So it’s not clear what’s going
on with the FBI seizing reporters’ notebooks regarding a diary that’s already been published- and not by Project Veritas. Is this an effort to put a lid on it? Or did someone try to blackmail the Bidens? Your guess is as good as mine, but First Amendment rights are at stake.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(