2/ Apple's lawsuit, filed moments ago in Northern California hits NSO hard.
- Seeks to hold NSO & parent accountable for abuses
- ALSO Requests permanent injunction banning NSO from using Apple products.
Directly hits NSO's core development & biz activities.
3/ NSO poked the hornet's nest for years, and @Apple wasn't satisfied with simply suing the spyware company..
Apple just pledged millions to groups working cyber surveillance... plus any damages that they extract from NSO.
Apple's wrath is poetic.
4/ Notifying NSO victims is another major step.
After @WhatsApp, Apple is the 2nd major company to do so.
✅Helps victims recognize what's going on
✅puts NSO's government customer base on notice: their abuses might be exposed next.
5/ NSO's accelerating tailspin, current status...
In recent weeks:
✅US🇺🇸 sanctioned NSO
✅ Court ruled that @WhatsApp's lawsuit against them could go ahead
✅ Reports that NSO is headed towards possible default.
Now, a massive lawsuit from Apple.
6/ NSO's profitable spyware is predictably used for repression by many dictators.
This didn't scare off unscrupulous investors.
Other spyware companies are now chasing their lead..
Now, NSO's *crisis* sends a different signal: your fortunes could come crashing down.
7/ NSO's spyware doesn't just harm human rights.
It hurts tech companies.
After years of spending efforts on technical means of control (e.g. patching & securing their products), big platforms have decided it was time to punch back in a different way:
In court.
8/ I see @Apple's lawsuit as partly triggered by findings & efforts of so many of our @citizenlab peers:
Most importantly though: the victims that bravely came forwards. Here's why...
9/ The FORCEDENTRY zero-click exploit is prominently mentioned @apple's lawsuit.
It was discovered when a spyware victim let us check their phone.
This is as it should be: targets of dictatorial surveillance contributing to fighting back & helping protect us all.
10/ Immediate effects of @Apple filing suit against NSO:
✅ NSO an even more radioactive investment.
✅ Investors that stuck with NSO look not only amoral, but foolish.
✅ Scares off risk-averse government customers.
✅ Chilling effect on spyware industry.
11/ It would take a huge internal effort for a massive company to undertake any one of these:
✔Lawsuit
✔Victim Notification
✔Attribution
✔Civil society support.
12/ Addendum to tweet #4: @billyleonard at TAG reminds me that @Google / @android should also be on the list of companies that have notified NSO victims in the past.
3/ Poor Arthur. But this is an institutional signal that, ~8 years in, militaries are still allowing enough location-aware devices in that it's a big threat.
Incidentally, the @lemondefr team has now been on the #stravaleaks issue for 3 years! I
UPDATE: @Plaid for AI happened faster than I warned.
We are in a historic transformation around AI agents.
Disruption will extend to the core of your privacy.
Companies know the appeal of agentic AI & are working to lock consumers into ecosystems designed to maximize data extraction.
It's not too late, but it might be soon.
But the thing about transformative moments is that new possibilities often open simultaneously with the risks.
We need to build, experiment with & use good private + open AI tools, local models that respect privacy by default & confidential inference that prevents companies from mining the data they process.
Do that & give us a fighting chance for future that respects our freedom, and our boundaries.
Sleep on the challenge of building openly & we relinquish the playing field to the same companies and dynamics that already degrade our autonomy...only faster & everywhere.
2/ What's the deal with @Plaid?
I find people are dimly aware about something involving connecting banking accounts.
I bet you don't know that Plaid helps themselves to mountains of your financial data in exchange for the convenience.
3/ Basically, by providing 'rails' @Plaid has managed to get an absolutely gods-eye-view on peoples financial behavior.
In real time.
That data is available to other companies. And governments.
YIKES: @perplexity_ai is flexing that they have OS-level access to 100M+ Samsung S26s.
Zero mention of:
Privacy
Security
Encryption
What will Perplexity do with this growing stash of personal data from deep inside Samsung phones? What jurisdictions will it live in? Who will it get shared with?
Here's the thing: Android's current security & privacy model involves sandboxing 3rd party apps from each other. TikTok can't read your private notes, for example.
Sandboxing is good & it narrows the attack surface against your private stuff.
But this #Perplexity integration breaks that baseline sandbox model, making a kernel-adjacent data bridge for Perplexity into your personal stuff.
Will users understand the structural shift in privacy?
Meanwhile, the risk of prompt injection & other attacks against an agentic AI that has OS-level access to personal stuff is also real.
Lots of speed, no signs of caution.
2/ Multiple agents & flows each with their own distinct security & privacy issues and levels of OS-level access to private stuff.
I doubt users have the cognitive spare room to parse privacy & security downsides each time they want to ask a question.