2/ Apple's lawsuit, filed moments ago in Northern California hits NSO hard.
- Seeks to hold NSO & parent accountable for abuses
- ALSO Requests permanent injunction banning NSO from using Apple products.
Directly hits NSO's core development & biz activities.
3/ NSO poked the hornet's nest for years, and @Apple wasn't satisfied with simply suing the spyware company..
Apple just pledged millions to groups working cyber surveillance... plus any damages that they extract from NSO.
Apple's wrath is poetic.
4/ Notifying NSO victims is another major step.
After @WhatsApp, Apple is the 2nd major company to do so.
✅Helps victims recognize what's going on
✅puts NSO's government customer base on notice: their abuses might be exposed next.
5/ NSO's accelerating tailspin, current status...
In recent weeks:
✅US🇺🇸 sanctioned NSO
✅ Court ruled that @WhatsApp's lawsuit against them could go ahead
✅ Reports that NSO is headed towards possible default.
Now, a massive lawsuit from Apple.
6/ NSO's profitable spyware is predictably used for repression by many dictators.
This didn't scare off unscrupulous investors.
Other spyware companies are now chasing their lead..
Now, NSO's *crisis* sends a different signal: your fortunes could come crashing down.
7/ NSO's spyware doesn't just harm human rights.
It hurts tech companies.
After years of spending efforts on technical means of control (e.g. patching & securing their products), big platforms have decided it was time to punch back in a different way:
In court.
8/ I see @Apple's lawsuit as partly triggered by findings & efforts of so many of our @citizenlab peers:
Most importantly though: the victims that bravely came forwards. Here's why...
9/ The FORCEDENTRY zero-click exploit is prominently mentioned @apple's lawsuit.
It was discovered when a spyware victim let us check their phone.
This is as it should be: targets of dictatorial surveillance contributing to fighting back & helping protect us all.
10/ Immediate effects of @Apple filing suit against NSO:
✅ NSO an even more radioactive investment.
✅ Investors that stuck with NSO look not only amoral, but foolish.
✅ Scares off risk-averse government customers.
✅ Chilling effect on spyware industry.
11/ It would take a huge internal effort for a massive company to undertake any one of these:
✔Lawsuit
✔Victim Notification
✔Attribution
✔Civil society support.
12/ Addendum to tweet #4: @billyleonard at TAG reminds me that @Google / @android should also be on the list of companies that have notified NSO victims in the past.
NEW: @WhatsApp caught & fixed a sophisticated zero click attack...
Now they've published an advisory about it.
Say attackers combined the exploit with an @Apple vulnerability to hack a specific group of targets (i.e. this wasn't pointed at everybody)
Quick thoughts 1/
Wait, you say, haven't I heard of @WhatsApp zero-click exploits before?
You have.
A big user base makes a platform big target for exploit development.
Think about it from the attacker's perspective: an exploit against a popular messenger gives you potential access to a lot of devices.
You probably want maximum mileage from that painstakingly developed, weaponized, and tested exploit code you created/ purchased (or got bundled into your Pegasus subscription).
3/ The regular tempo of large platforms catching sophisticated exploits is a good sign.
They're paying attention & devoting resources to this growing category of highly targeted, sophisticated attacks.
But it's also a reminder of the magnitude of the threat out there...
WHOA: megapublisher @axelspringer is asking a German court to ban an ad-blocker.
Their claim that should make everyone nervous:
The HTML/ CSS code of websites are protected computer programs.
And influencing they are displayed (e.g by removing ads) violates copyright.
1/
2/ Preventing ad-blocking would be a huge blow to German cybersecurity and privacy.
There are critical security & privacy reasons to influence how a websites code gets displayed.
Like stripping out dangerous code & malvertising.
Or blocking unwanted trackers.
This is why most governments do it on their systems.
3/Defining HTML/CSS as a protected computer program will quickly lead to absurdities touching every corner of the internet.
Just think of the potential infringements:
-Screen readers for the blind
-'Dark mode' bowser extensions
-Displaying snippets of code in a university class
-Inspecting & modifying code in your own browser
-Website translators
3/ What still gives me chills is how many cases surfaced of people killed by cartels... or their family members... getting targeted with Pegasus spyware.
The #PegasusProject found even more potential cases in Mexico.