2/ Apple's lawsuit, filed moments ago in Northern California hits NSO hard.
- Seeks to hold NSO & parent accountable for abuses
- ALSO Requests permanent injunction banning NSO from using Apple products.
Directly hits NSO's core development & biz activities.
3/ NSO poked the hornet's nest for years, and @Apple wasn't satisfied with simply suing the spyware company..
Apple just pledged millions to groups working cyber surveillance... plus any damages that they extract from NSO.
Apple's wrath is poetic.
4/ Notifying NSO victims is another major step.
After @WhatsApp, Apple is the 2nd major company to do so.
✅Helps victims recognize what's going on
✅puts NSO's government customer base on notice: their abuses might be exposed next.
5/ NSO's accelerating tailspin, current status...
In recent weeks:
✅US🇺🇸 sanctioned NSO
✅ Court ruled that @WhatsApp's lawsuit against them could go ahead
✅ Reports that NSO is headed towards possible default.
Now, a massive lawsuit from Apple.
6/ NSO's profitable spyware is predictably used for repression by many dictators.
This didn't scare off unscrupulous investors.
Other spyware companies are now chasing their lead..
Now, NSO's *crisis* sends a different signal: your fortunes could come crashing down.
7/ NSO's spyware doesn't just harm human rights.
It hurts tech companies.
After years of spending efforts on technical means of control (e.g. patching & securing their products), big platforms have decided it was time to punch back in a different way:
In court.
8/ I see @Apple's lawsuit as partly triggered by findings & efforts of so many of our @citizenlab peers:
Most importantly though: the victims that bravely came forwards. Here's why...
9/ The FORCEDENTRY zero-click exploit is prominently mentioned @apple's lawsuit.
It was discovered when a spyware victim let us check their phone.
This is as it should be: targets of dictatorial surveillance contributing to fighting back & helping protect us all.
10/ Immediate effects of @Apple filing suit against NSO:
✅ NSO an even more radioactive investment.
✅ Investors that stuck with NSO look not only amoral, but foolish.
✅ Scares off risk-averse government customers.
✅ Chilling effect on spyware industry.
11/ It would take a huge internal effort for a massive company to undertake any one of these:
✔Lawsuit
✔Victim Notification
✔Attribution
✔Civil society support.
12/ Addendum to tweet #4: @billyleonard at TAG reminds me that @Google / @android should also be on the list of companies that have notified NSO victims in the past.
Here are some more damming revelations as Intellexa, the shady, sanctioned spyware supplier gets exposed by @AmnestyTech & partners.. /1
2/ First, a mercenary spyware myth has just been busted.
Because the leak shows an Intellexa employee directly accessing a customer deployment.
Prior to the #PredatorFiles leak, spyware companies basically always claimed they couldn't access customer deployments & didn't know what was going on there.
They used this to avoid responsibility & claim ignorance when faced with abuses.
3/ And it gets crazier. The leak shows Intellexa casually accessing a core backbone of Predator deployment of a government customer.
Seemingly without the gov's knowledge.
Suggests that Intellexa can look over their shoulder & watch their sensitive targeting.
NEW: 🇨🇳Chinese hackers ran massive campaign by tricking Claude's agentic AI.
Vibe hacking ran 80-90% of the operation without humans.
Massive scale (1000s of reqs/sec).
Agents ran complex multi-step tasks, shepherded by a human.
Long predicted. Welcome to the new world.
Fascinating report by @AnthropicAI 1/
2/ The old cybersecurity pitch: unpatched systems are the threat.
The next generation concern might be unpatched cognition.
The attacker jailbroke the cognitive layer of @anthropic's Claude code, successfully convincing the system of false intent (that it was a security exercise)
3/ One of the key points in @AnthropicAI's report is just how limited the human time required was to run such a large automated campaign.
Obviously powerful stuff, highlighting the impact of orchestration.
And concerning for the #cybersecurity world for all sorts of reasons, ranging from attack scale, adaptability & cost reductions...
A "damaging" leak of tools from a five eyes exploit developer?
Concerning. We need to know what's under this rug.
Big picture: "trusted, vetted" private sector players offensive cyber are not immune to losing control of tooling... with national security consequences 1/
2/ If true, a tooling leak at boutique firm Trenchant wouldn't be the first time that exploits from commercial offensive vendors wind up... in the wrong place.
Many questions.
In the meantime. Remember when Russian APT29..was caught with exploits first used by NSO & Intellexa?
3/ There will always be a push for states to turn towards the private sector to meet offensive needs.
It's appealing. For some, it's very lucrative.
But in practice it brings unavoidable counterintelligence & national security downside risk that shouldn't be downplayed.