Some people argued that GDP isn't the only measure of quality of life.
They're right, of course, but they generally failed to mention any factors that might make Shanghai more annoying of a place to live!
Some people responded with instinctive contempt for West Virginia.
Others tried to find fault in the statistics themselves, but failed. (The numbers were already per capita and PPP.)
Some argued that instead of comparing living standards, we should compare growth rates. The implication being, I suppose, that Shanghai will soon be richer than West Virginia. (That may or may not come to pass.)
Many people came up with odd theories for why one would compare West Virginia to Shanghai, but one of the oddest was this one:
Some felt that the comparison was a dunk on Shanghai, and felt the need to invoke historical narratives of oppression to excuse Shanghai's supposed underperformance relative to West Virginia...
A few communists weighed in, often to make fun of poor people West Virginia.
Which I guess shows you how much communists care.
Not all of the responses were coherent. I find that a lot of people sort of think *at* things rather than *about* them.
One of the funnier classes of responses was people who think comparing WV to Shanghai is about comparing neoliberalism to (whatever they imagine China's model to be), and concluding that China's model wins because it has big buildings
And there's always that one guy who shows up to say "this is racist"
One interesting class of response was "Who would want to live in WV over Shanghai?"
Which was funny because if you opened up the border between the two, what do you actually think would happen
I don't even know what this response meant, but I'm not gonna red out Nilo's name because he's an interesting guy and you should check him out on Twitter!
I was indeed being sneaky (i.e., absentmindedly stupid) by using Shanghai, because the richest city in China is actually either HK or Macau. But the comparison would have been the same for Beijing or Shenzhen vs. West Virginia.
Anyway, these are just the responses that challenged or downplayed the comparison. Lots of responses were just "🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸" or "China is overrated", which is an equally simplistic and impressionistic response!
To sum up, lots of people think about these comparisons as being a sort of head-to-head test of civilizations, national governments, or economic policy paradigms...instead of just a way to help get a better perspective about comparative living standards around the world.
(end)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/Here's something a lot of people I talk to don't understand about Japanese urbanism, and why Japanese cities are so special.
2/Japanese cities feel different than big, dense cities elsewhere -- NYC, London, and Paris, but also other Asian cities like Hong Kong, Shanghai, and Singapore.
There are many reasons for this, but today I'll focus on one: Zakkyo buildings.
3/When many people think of "mixed-use development", they think of stores on the first floor, apartments on the higher floors. This is sometimes called "shop-top housing" or "over-store apartments".
This is how most cities in the world do mixed-use development.
1/Here's something I've been wondering about recently: How did the U.S. miss the battery revolution?
With every other technological revolution, we anticipated it well in advance, and as a result we were the first -- or one of the first -- to take advantage of it.
2/The U.S. invented the computer, the internet, and modern AI. On all three of those, we were (or are) the leading nation. We talked ad infinitum about the benefits of those digital technologies long before they became a reality, allowing us to shape their eventual use.
3/We did the Human Genome Project. We invented mRNA vaccines. We did most of the research that drove down the costs of solar power. Jimmy Carter put solar panels on the White House more than 30 years before it became economical.
Russia's empire is a nested hierarchy. At the center is Moscow. Under them are mid-tier Russian cities and rural areas, then subject peoples like the Buryats, Sakha, and these African folks.
The closer you are to the center, the less fighting you do, and the more money you get.
In fact, the circles of Russian hierarchy don't stop at Moscow. There are privileged subgroups of Muscovites, then more privileged groups inside that circle, all the way up to the Tsar himself.
The principle still holds: Closer to the center = less fighting, more money.
The advantage of this organizational structure is that the more power you have, the less likely you are to ever suffer negative consequences from adverse shocks or bad decisions. All the losses from failed wars, bad economic decisions, etc. get taken by the less powerful.
In fact, it's not law even now. This executive order is (sadly) AGAINST the law and will probably be struck down, because our asylum law says we can't discriminate against asylum claimants for crossing the border illegally. That law needs to be changed by Congress.
The problem is that the U.S. is a party to the 1967 UN Convention on the Status of Refugees, which says that your asylum system can't discriminate against people for being in the country illegally. We wrote our domestic law to comply with that treaty.
The non-discrimination provision is obviously stupid, so what we need to do is flout the 1967 UN Convention on the Status of Refugees, and simply amend our domestic law to say "You can't claim asylum if you crossed illegally". But this would require an act of Congress.
About 8% of students have participated in the protests on one side or the other. That's a substantial number, but less than the 21% who joined BLM protests in May/June 2020 (and the latter were pretty much all on one side of the issue).