There’s a difference between what *sexes* are and the variation *within* the sexes. :)

Producing a male or female requires a complex spatiotemporal sequence of interacting networks. It’s not surprising this process can produce atypical variation, but this exists within M/F.
For more on what sexes fundamentally are and why developmental variation does not form new ones:
theparadoxinstitute.com/blog/2021/04/1…
Recognizing that there’s 1) only two sexes and 2) plenty of variation within both sexes is a scientifically accurate position.

These two things are not mutually exclusive.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Zach Elliott

Zach Elliott Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @zaelefty

18 Nov
Activists often conflate chromosomes with sex, claiming that biologists only thought sex was binary because male and female were defined by XY and XX.

Here's why this is false.

THREAD 🧵
The argument is a strawman because scientists who studied the biology of sex never thought male and female were defined by chromosomes, nor did they think the discovery of chromosomes was the ‘end of the story.’
Chromosomes were only discovered in 1882, the Y chromosome in 1905, and the sex-determining region Y gene (SRY) in 1990. Scientists, and especially biologists, already understood what male and female were well before any of these discoveries.
Read 8 tweets
15 Nov
People with Down syndrome have an extra copy of chromosome 21. That’s why the syndrome is called Trisomy 21.

You wouldn’t think someone with an extra copy of the 21st chromosome would be anything other than male or female.

So why would you do it with XXY, XO, XYY, and so on?
These are chromosomal disorders just as much as Trisomy 21 is. They just so happen to impact the sex chromosomes, not the autosomes.

But because sex determination in mammals is binary, these atypical karyotypes do not result in anything other than males or females.
Read 4 tweets
14 Nov
I find it interesting to think about how the Sex Spectrum has similarities to Young Earth Creationism (YEC) in its pseudoscientific argument techniques.

One example is through the use of "ad hoc rescue", the use of evidence-less rationalizations to dismiss counter-evidence.
When a person's beliefs are challenged with evidence, each challenge is often met with a specific rationalization to dismiss the evidence.

This rationalization will often change each time a different challenge to their belief is forwarded. The rationale will be baseless.
For example, YEC claims that the universe was created roughly 10,000 years ago.

When cosmologists show that the Hubble Space Telescope can see objects billions of light years away, YEC claims that the light must've been created in transit or sped up to "appear" old [AD HOC].
Read 11 tweets
14 Nov
This evolutionary biology paper on the evolution of two sexes, by Lehtonen & Parker, is the gold standard for explaining why there’s only two sexes in anisogamous species.

I started sharing it in June 2020. It’s great to see it being shared so much!

academic.oup.com/molehr/article…
There’s even a section that tracks every time it’s shared on Twitter and shows the tweets referencing it.
oxfordjournals.altmetric.com/details/280215…
Geoff Parker has been a critical researcher in the evolutionary origins and maintenance of male and female since at least the 1970s.

His papers have been cited thousands of times and make up a critical part of the extensive body of research on the evolution of anisogamy.
Read 8 tweets
2 Nov
Sex determination in mammals is binary. Every karyotype in humans results in a male or female.

Genetic errors, such as the unequal distributions of chromosomes (nondisjunction), do not create new sexes.
This shows us that karyotype (the collection of an individual’s chromosomes) is conceptually independent from what sexes are.

It is true that 46:XX and 46:XY are tightly linked to females and males, respectively, but it is not true that this is the defining feature of F and M.
In other words, you can have a karyotype outside of the norm, and you will still be a male or female.

Ex: XXY = male; XO = female
Read 10 tweets
27 Oct
Gender, as described by theorists and activists as an expression of behavior, is practically “personality” at this point.

Are there personality sex differences? Yes. Does this mean a masculine girl is actually a boy? No.
This is what a typical sex difference between males and females in a Big Five personality trait looks like. The averages are very close together.

Traits like this show us there is plenty of variation within males and within females to reject rigid behavioral categorizations.
Trait Agreeableness.

Males and females, on average, are far more alike than different in this trait.

Extremes of the bell curves show little overlap, however (Ex: The MOST disagreeable people are almost always men.)
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(