Yoram Hazony Profile picture
Nov 23, 2021 11 tweets 2 min read Read on X
We are watching an elite-led cultural revolution, being conducted *from above* by powerful institutions in the name of oppressed minorities.

1/
This was impossible in classical Marxism, because Marx and Engels regarded the capitalists and their allies—that is, the elites—as the oppressors.

2/
But after WWI, neo-Marxists devised a more flexible theory that allowed any powerful social structure—not just capitalism—to be regarded as the oppressor.

In this way, racial and gender oppression came to be at least as important as oppression on the basis of economic class.

3/
Marx and Engels foresaw that the Revolution would be led in part by members of the elites who chose to side with the oppressed working class.

4/
What Marx and Engels didn’t foresee is that neo-Marxism would open the door for *most or all* of the wealthy and powerful elites in a given society to lead a Revolution directed principally against racial and gender oppression—*instead* of economic oppression by capitalists.

5/
So now we have something remarkable: Wealthy and powerful neo-Marxist elites—including ideologically neo-Marxist capitalists—leading a Revolution against racial and gender oppression *that is supposed to be taking place primarily among the working class.*

6/
Marx and Engels claimed that the capitalists and their allies were using Enlightenment liberalism as an ideological justification for the continued oppression of the working class.

7/
What they didn’t foresee is that capitalists and their allies could just as easily use “woke” neo-Marxism as an ideological justification for subjugating old-time liberals and conservatives—most of whom are today found among the working class.

8/
So we’ve come full circle:

Marxism was intended as a theory of “Revolution from below” whose aim was to liberate the working class.

But it’s now become a race- and gender-flavored neo-Marxism, a theory of “Revolution from above” seeking the subjugation of the working class.
9/
As I’ve said many times, I’m no class warrior. I’m a nationalist, and I’d prefer to see a partnership among the different classes and tribes that make up the nation.

That’s what every nation needs in order to endure and grow strong.

10/
But if the elites embrace neo-Marxist race and gender theories as an instrument for oppressing their less powerful and less educated countrymen, I know which side I’m going to be on.

end/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Yoram Hazony

Yoram Hazony Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @yhazony

Sep 22, 2023
I hate to spend even ten minutes on a lowlife like Avik Roy. But he recently gave a 45-minute interview in which he repeatedly says NatCons seek a "white ethnostate" in America as our "core" goal. I want to make sure everyone understands who and what this guy is.
/1
Avik Roy's "white ethnostate" interview was posted as a podcast on Law and Liberty along with a transcript of the interview. You can read it here:

/2lawliberty.org/podcast/toward…
Avik Roy begins his "white ethnostate" interview by stating that his target is national conservatives, our NatCon conferences, and our 10-point Statement of Principles.
/3 Image
Read 19 tweets
May 24, 2023
For months friends have been asking me: "What's wrong with James Lindsay? Why's he acting so strange?"

I've been saying I don't really know. He refuses to even have a conversation with me.

But I finally have some thoughts to share: A thread on "What's wrong with James?"

/1
The first thing to understand about where James's head is right now is that he believes "conservative Christianity" is about to be "largely politically nullified" in the United States.

/2


This isn't a long-term prediction. James has said repeatedly that the destruction of conservative Christian influence is going to happen in a massive attack by the left over the coming summer.

/3


Read 38 tweets
Nov 18, 2022
If you don’t know the Bible well, you cannot understand the forces that created the Western world.

If you don’t know the great thinkers of the common law tradition, you cannot understand the forces that created Britain and America.

1/
The reason the Bible and the common law tradition have been excluded from the history of ideas and political theory is that they give expression to human particularity—and not *only* to human universals.

But you cannot understand human beings without human particularity.

/2
This exclusion of the Bible and the common law tradition from our understanding of history and ideas leaves us intellectually crippled.

It means we can’t understand our own past and present. It means we can’t see the path forward.

/3
Read 4 tweets
Aug 27, 2022
Bob Kagan dictated this party line in March 2019—in a Wapo essay explaining that NatCons really just want to bring dictatorship to America.

Since then the choirboys keep writing the same ridiculous essay—without so much as adding a new thought to it.

/1 theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
I love how they can’t even come up with a new color scheme.

/2


washingtonpost.com/news/opinions/…
Truth is, there are very big things happening at NatCon 3. The conservative movement isn’t going to be the same after this.

But the choirboys have no clue what’s happening. They’re not *interested* in what’s happening.

They just re-write that same old essay from 2019 !

/3
Read 5 tweets
Aug 26, 2022
An alliance does not require a “fusion” of interests or identities. It’s a limited collaboration in pursuit of specific common aims.

Alliance between Jews and Christians doesn’t require “fusion.”

Alliance between anti-Marxist liberals and conservatives doesn’t require “fusion.”
The 1960s strategy of “fusion” between anti-Marxist liberals and conservatives was based on the negation of conservatism as an independent movement with a vision and an identity of its own.

/2
But anti-Marxist liberals do not share a vision of society with their conservative friends.

We have two different visions. There can be no “fusing” these visions into one without destroying one vision or the other.

/3
Read 11 tweets
Aug 4, 2022
Three superb essays defending "Christian nationalism" were published in the last week by young Protestant and Catholic writers in the US.

This is a dramatic breakthrough after years in which many American Christian writers have been equivocal on this subject.

Essays below.

/1
This is from @William_E_Wolfe at the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary:

2/

standingforfreedom.com/2022/07/whats-…
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(