MATURED surveillance effort on Trump campaign, fruits & leads of which get subsequently covered & laundered by IMMEDIATE, open-ended, bi-partisan inquiry into "everywhere INTEL TELLS US to go", including "any intel re links between Rus & individuals..." which end up...
Serendipitously reported typically by Simpson friend @thamburger, front-running the bi-partisan & Mueller investigations with surreptitious sourcing to underlying email conversations, which were...
Already intercepted in real-time during 2016 campaign, and written into Dossier.
The entire CYCLE is premeditated, including @IgorDanch fake HUMINT sourcing actions, and supporting articles by @thamburger, @BrianRoss, @joshrogin, @mattmosk, @Markmaremont, @CatherineBelton, et al.
Since Trump was forewarned about "those who would seek to undermine your successful campaign...", it turned out there was NOTHING ILLEGAL for them to surveil... 😋

And with no convictions on 'collusion', they had to suffice for writing about 'contacts' in a Mueller "Report"....

While they await Durham's Critical Review of their work.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with MonsieursGhost

MonsieursGhost Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MonsieursGhost

22 Nov
Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions

Chapter VI: Anomaly & Emergence of Scientific Discoveries Image
Anomalies: General Conclusions Image
Scientific Crisis Image
Read 6 tweets
21 Nov
IMPORTANT: @PostRoz @thamburger wrote two stories re @SergeiMillian, Mar '17 & Feb '19, changed only last week. @SallyBuzbee can't defend facts, but moralizes that 'reporters' are "completely ethical".

The two stories, 2017 & 2019 respectively.

The salient issue isn't that both stories involve @SergeiMillian, but something deeper.

The 2017 vintage, as makes clear by headline, is focused on *cementing* ID of 'Source D' as Sergei, replete with head-shot. Image
Straight out the gate, @thamburger cites a June "conversation", purportedly @SergeiMillian's, that "was not confidential", and is ripped direct (as quoted) from para 2 of Steele's memo 80.

2021 vintage = this is retractable bullshit.

So what happens to attribution of Source D? Image
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!