Pillow magnate Mike Lindell has posted a copy of his long-promised election-overturning Supreme Court complaint on his website and it's missing a few things you commonly find in lawsuits, such as a plaintiff and lawyers. 
The claim seems to rely on an Electors Clause theory that the Supreme Court declined to hear last year and a state standing argument that it rejected when Texas sued. And until [insert Your State] agrees to file, the court wouldn't have jurisdiction anyway.
Lindell's complaint appears to have been written by the same lawyer who drafted Texas' failed Supreme Court election-overturning lawsuit.
It claims that President Biden acted unconstitutionally by not fixing problems in the 2020 election, which 1) isn't something the president can do; and 2) he wasn't the president then.
Anyway, I read Lindell's complaint. tl;dr:
* This is not an actual lawsuit
* The court already said it wouldn't hear this stuff
* It's a huge grab-bag of conspiracies, most of which have been known to be false for an entire year now
* An actual lawyer wrote this
Caveat emptor.
* This is not an actual lawsuit
* The court already said it wouldn't hear this stuff
* It's a huge grab-bag of conspiracies, most of which have been known to be false for an entire year now
* An actual lawyer wrote this
Caveat emptor.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
