The situation is even clearer when plotted on a log scale:
UK is broadly a flat line, with European countries cutting up steeply through it. France, Italy & Spain all on course to pass UK for cases. Germany now above UK for daily deaths and Netherlands set to follow.
So why these exponential surges across Europe but not in the UK?
There’s increasingly little difference in social mixing behaviour between the countries, and where we do see differences e.g in mask-wearing, they’re generally more virus-friendly in the UK 🤔
The answer:
UK’s July reopening led to much more of its population being infected than elsewhere in western Europe. Between vax and infection-acquired immunity, UK has more protection, Europe has more susceptible people.
Despite UK having lower vax coverage than e.g Belgium & France, the difference in share of people previously infected is larger (UK 30%, FRA 15%), meaning that going into this winter, the UK had fewer people still exposed to the virus, less scope for a wave of hospitalisations.
This filled gaps in the UK’s vax coverage, leaving very few completely unprotected.
In Germany, lower vax rates and less infection-acq immunity mean far more ongoing exposure.
In Romania, despite huge numbers of past infections, gaps in elderly vax coverage left huge exposure.
But of course, that infection-acquired immunity comes at a grim cost. The UK has recorded more than 15,000 new Covid deaths since reopening no July 19.
That’s more over that period than any European country except Romania in absolute terms, and now around 10th highest per-capita
The big question is how that number will compare once winter is done?
In July UK’s running toll was highest in Europe. Several eastern European countries have since overtaken, and plotting the same on a log scale shows that others further west are heading the same way
But will the UK’s western European peers pass that same grim toll, or could they still avoid the worst?
A big part of the answer lies in boosters, where we now have extremely clear signals from the UK...
Let’s start with cases in England.
Look at the first half of October: all age groups rising in lockstep.
November? Not so much. Cases have risen among under-60s, but fallen fast among older groups.
Let’s take a closer look...
Here we focus only on the two mini-waves — first half of Oct, and middle of Nov. Spot the difference...
In Oct rates rose in the elderly just like everyone else. In recent weeks, there is a stark divergence.
But what makes me say that this is boosters and not behaviour? Well...
This is a new chart format I’ve been working on for a few days. Lines still show age-groups, but they now change colour as people get boosters.
In October booster coverage was still low even in elderly. But by late Nov you can clearly see how boosters drive cases down 💉📉
And if you thought that was impressive, take a look at the same thing for hospital admissions:
Admissions in England have been relatively stable among people aged 18-64 in England over recent weeks, but they’re falling precipitously in the mostly-boosted over-65s 💉🏥📉
To reiterate, cases among under-60s in England have risen in recent weeks, but among mostly-boosted elderly they have not merely risen more slowly, they’ve *fallen*.
Strong evidence that with a fast rollout, boosters can change the slope of a wave, especially for severe outcomes
Here’s a reworking of a brilliant @PaulMainwood chart using the same format:
As boosters roll out, lines turns red, and then arc upwards as waning immunity is reversed.
You can already see early signs of 50-69s beginning to turn as they go from blue to ... I wanna say lavender?
Good news for western Europe is there are early signs of a booster effect there too 🎉
Compare Belgium (started boosters in Sept) to Netherlands (started last week):
Cases among Belgium’s mostly-boosted elderly are no longer tracking younger groups. Netherlands? Not so much...
So good reason to think that with fast booster rollouts, western European countries should see:
• Cases begin to flatten and fall among the most vulnerable
• Meaning a steep rise in cases no longer necessarily translates into a steep rise in hosp/death
But there are caveats...
Specifically, boosters can only help those who’ve already had two doses, and in many countries that number is too low.
Austria illustrates this well:
Almost everyone second dosed 6 months ago has had a booster...
But its high unvaxxed rates mean that this booster surge has merely taken its share of people without vaccination protection down from being far higher than all of its peers, to only far higher than *some*.
Plus rollout was too late to get ahead of the wave.
There’s a stark warning here for the US, too.
Whilst the US’ summer wave will have — like the UK — generated a lot of infection-acquired immunity, that is offset by very poor vaccination rates (both second doses and third).
One key tool for accelerating uptake could be to do what @nicolamlow said to @samgadjones: "we should stop calling them boosters, and start calling them third doses".
As @PaulMainwood has demonstrated, there is a growing body of evidence for that view
So to conclude (1/2)
• UK’s July reopening likely generated enough infection-acquired immunity to shield it from continent’s winter wave
• But that came at a cost of thousands of deaths, far higher rate than peer countries [so far]
• Boosters also key to UK’s current successes
(2/2)
• If western European countries can accelerate booster rollout they can blunt the wave, esp in terms of hospitalisations & deaths
• But some, like Austria, are hamstrung by low uptake of the primary course. You can’t boosted the unvaxxed, and Austria has a lot of them.
The number of people travelling from Europe to the US in recent weeks has plummeted by as much as 35%, as travellers have cancelled plans in response to Trump’s policies and rhetoric, and horror stories from the border.
Denmark saw one of the steepest declines, in an indication that anger over Trump’s hostility towards Greenland may be contributing to the steep drop-off in visitor numbers.
Corporate quotes are usually pretty dry, but the co-founder of major travel website Kayak wasn’t mincing his words:
Recent results from major international tests show that the average person’s capacity to process information, use reasoning and solve novel problems has been falling since around the mid 2010s.
What should we make of this?
Nobody would argue that the fundamental biology of the human brain has changed in that time span. People’s underlying intellectual capacity is surely undimmed.
But there is growing evidence that the extent to which people can practically apply that capacity has been diminishing.
For such an important topic, there’s remarkably little long-term data on attention spans, focus etc.
But one source that has consistently tracked this is the Monitoring The Future survey, which finds a steep rise in the % of people struggling to concentrate or learn new things.
NEW: The actions of Trump and Vance in recent weeks highlight something under-appreciated.
The American right is now ideologically closer to countries like Russia, Turkey and in some senses China, than to the rest of the west (even the conservative west).
In the 2000s, US Republicans thought about the world in similar ways to Britons, Europeans, Canadians.
This made for productive relationships regardless of who was in the White House.
The moderating layers around Trump #1 masked the divergence, but with Trump #2 it’s glaring.
In seven weeks Trump’s America has shattered decades-long western norms and blindsided other western leaders with abrupt policy changes.
This is because many of the values of Trump’s America are not the values of western liberal democracies.
NEW: updated long-run gap in voting between young men and women in Germany:
The gender gap continues to widen, but contrary to what is often assumed, young men continue to vote roughly in line with the overall population, while young women have swung very sharply left.
My wish for the next election is that poll trackers look like the one on the right 👉 not the left
This was yet another election where the polling showed it could easily go either way, but most of the charts just showed two nice clean lines, one leading and one trailing. Bad!
Pollsters and poll aggregators have gone to great lengths to emphasise the amount of uncertainty in the polls in recent weeks...
But have generally still put out charts and polling toplines that encourage people to ignore the uncertainty and focus on who’s one point ahead. Bad!
The thing about human psychology is, once you give people a nice clean number, it doesn’t matter how many times you say "but there’s an error margin of +/- x points, anything is possible".
People are going to anchor on that central number. We shouldn’t enable this behaviour!