why do idealized conceptual nouns tend toward equilibrium trains, mang?
the upwardly mobile nashians are talking about the lindy laws again lmao
imagine game theory and rest walk into a bar

haha no they didn't read the papers either
we can't talk. it's over. immutability changes everything!
i don't like idealized conceptual nouns as one of the only outside games we may play, but immutability changes everything, rest, and what nash actually wrote?

what the heck else do corporate identities expect not to read? yuji ijiri too?! the fuck
no lamport, no plantinga, no gettier, no wittgenstein, no nothing

you're stealing

stop

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with ⚫️ aha hah, coastal druidic⁹ memorist⁸

⚫️ aha hah, coastal druidic⁹ memorist⁸ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @holoentropic

26 Nov
i have to deal with it so do you, so.

```
◇ 2+2=5.
necessarily, if ◇ God exists, then it is necessary that God exists.
necessarily, if God exists, then it is not the case that 2+2=5.
Therefore, ¬◇ God exists. (from A, B, & C)
```
my reply? well, there is no fact in my mental history that determines what i mean when i say things. communication performs, actions express
seems like a standard reply, but i think non-standard ones are conceivable, if not warrantable and even truth-apt. i have defended our lord's name for quite some time now, being the mountain of names. it is any wonder that a particle should pass through a mountain without one
Read 38 tweets
25 Nov
meta-nomically applied: known past rules, principles, tenets, axioms, policies, prescriptions, etc. form selectable relations for future rounds at play
so CHANGE, UNCERTAIN (CHANCE), etc. probability density stated in contingency tables, thanks wittgenstein

-------------------------
aBb | aBBb | aBBA | ...
-------------------------
0 | f(-1)
1 | f(-1)
¬1 | f(-2)
2 | f(-3)
...
Read 5 tweets
25 Nov
-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE SONG GAME -----
=BB=
=_?=
=B=
=BAA=

=_?= =_?=
so roll 6d6 to SIMULATE a CARD, CONFIRMATION, or CONVERSATION, or CONVENTION
CONSENSUS involves DISSENSUS
Read 7 tweets
25 Nov
there isn't (just) no unity problem, post-gettier
sΩฯ :|
1. ฯ is grue
2. sθp
3. s@f(|ฯ)==@ฯ
```
1. ...
-1. ...
2. ...
```*
Read 14 tweets
25 Nov
the unity problem is the problem of evil
is every number better than the quality of every number?
is relation better than the quality of relation?
Read 8 tweets
25 Nov
points for signs @anarchomuaddab Image
temporal terrorism? cyber-, crypto-, compositional semiotic meta-terrorismsm
inaccessible, unsustainable, relational capitalism is an operating system for and of the terror of value
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(