Companies in the Government’s ‘VIP’ lane for the supply of PPE see £100 million boost in profits
The 9 companies in the list declare a cumulative profit increase from £8.5m to £109m, an investigation by @BylineBITE and @allthecitizens finds.
THREAD:
Under legal pressure, the Government last week released the 50 firms that won contracts through a special procurement process during the pandemic. The companies featured in the VIP lane were 10 times more likely to win Government contracts than other firms
The evidence suggests that the VIP lane was used internally by the Government to sort and prioritise potential suppliers; many of the companies were unaware that they were being processed through an expedited route.
MPs, ministers, and officials could refer companies to the lane, where many of the firms then benefited heavily from their inclusion.
Our calculations show that, of 13 firms that have posted financials, 9 mention post tax profits that, combined, show a total twelve fold increase
Previously, @BylineBITE and @allthecitizens uncovered a £121.7m increase in profits for PPE contract winners with Conservative links. Likewise, critics have pointed to many of companies in the VIP lane having party connections:
Two firms on the VIP lane with the seeming largest profit increases are Meller Designs and Ayanda Capital. The latter controversially won a £250 million contract brokered by Andrew Mills, who was at the time an advisor to the Government’s Board of Trade.
A Meller Designs spokesperson previously told The Times: “We are extremely proud of the role we played at the height of the crisis and managed to secure more than 150 million items of PPE.” thetimes.co.uk/article/tory-b…
Care home provider Blueleaf also saw a significant jump in profits in its latest accounts. The firm lost £883,000 in the previous year, only to see their intake increase to £17.4 million during the period to December 2020.
Education furniture firm Monarch Acoustics, referred to the VIP lane by former Health Secretary Matt Hancock, recorded profits of £10.9m, after making just £244,000 the previous year. politico.eu/article/conser…
There’s no suggestion of wrongdoing on the part of the groups, the lane was managed by government, and the companies will have accrued income from other sources, but it’s in the public interest to know where taxpayer money has gone, and all won contracts in the accounting period.
All parties mentioned have been approached for comment.
This is exactly why, with our partner @Foxglove and your support, we are challenging the government for their use of disappearing messages in handling public affairs.
Cabinet will now have to answer for its shambolic WhatsApp policies in court.
@Foxglove Last October, we obtained a first victory: the High Court gave us formal permission to proceed to a full judicial review of 'government by Whatsapp
NEW:🚨@Femi_Sorry fact-checks Boris Johnson’s social care reform plans.
Quiz time! How many minutes into this week’s PMQs did it take Boris Johnson to tell his first lie?
➡️ a) 10.5 minutes
➡️ b) 1.5 minutes?
Or
➡️ c) 1.5 seconds?
Trick question. We regret to inform you that Boris Johnson actually told *2* lies in the first 1.5 seconds..
If you want a reminder of what he said last year, here’s @AdamBienkov with Boris Johnson spelling out in Boris Johnson’s own words exactly what those promises were (that he’s now broken)
42% of Russell Group Universities refuse to say which Chinese state-linked tech firms fund them, citing non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) or Freedom of Information exemptions, research by @BylineBITE and @allthecitizens has found.🧵
We asked 24 Russell Group institutions which companies were funding their tech research. 3 did not respond to requests, 11 cited NDAs or Section 43 FOI exemptions. And 2 refused to disclose for reasons relating to cost or because the data was “not routinely collected centrally”.
Of those that did share information about Uni research agreements with Chinese tech firms, typically only minimal information was released.
At least 24 NDAs between universities and the Chinese company Huawei have been signed since 2018.
In 2020 Malaysian firm Supermax won a £311m contract to supply gloves to the NHS, despite previous allegations of human rights abuses and forced labour at its factories. Is British taxpayers’ money being used to fund modern slavery?
Read @samueljlovett's latest report on Supermax. Despite allegations of modern slavery, in July the UK govt placed an order with Supermax for 135m gloves costing £7.9m. independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-n…
The Citizens are preparing to launch a joint legal case against the Department for Health alongside @WilsonsLondon which represents several workers in Malaysian glove factories who claim they have been exploited. wilsonllp.co.uk/the-citizens-n…
#AccessDenied report highlights how transparency in 2020 in terms of FOI disclosure rates by the govt has been the lowest ever. 1/8
@openDemocracy report implicates the Cabinet Office of being even less transparent in comparison to other depts, pointing to how it blocked "requests from MPs about its use of public money to conduct political research" 2/8
@openDemocracy has released its new report 'Access Denied' today which uncovers the govt's failure to comply to FOI requests, with the 2020 FOI disclosure rates "lowest...since records began in 2005".
The news follows on from previous reporting by @openDemocracy, which revealed the existence of the 'Orwellian' Clearing House, a unit operating within the Cabinet Office accused of 'blacklisting' journalists: