Thread by @Monaheart1229

ICYMI:
Yesterday DC Court of Appeals asked lawyers for Trump, J6 & NARA to prep to argue whether the courts even have the jurisdiction to hear this case
Hearing is Monday
NOT looking good for Trump
Here:
nbcnews.com/politics/donal…

2/"[Appeals court] raised the question on its own, meaning it was not suggested by the lawyers in the case.

3/"It asked: "Does the provision in the Presidential Records Act providing that the Archivist’s 'determination whether access to a Presidential record ... shall be restricted ... shall not be subject to judicial review, except as provided in subsection (e) of this section'

4/"... implicate this court’s or the district court’s jurisdiction in this case?" The court cited a 2001 case involving a challenge to the plans for the World War II Memorial on the National Mall in Washington. Congress had passed a law saying no court could review the plans.

5/"The challengers argued that the legislative language was unconstitutional, but an appeals court disagreed and tossed the lawsuit. Tuesday's order also directed the lawyers to be ready to answer a second question:

6/""If so, what effect, if any, do [those provisions] have on the subject matter jurisdiction of the district court to adjudicate any of the requests listed in the Complaint’s Claim for Relief?'"