As a companion to our new paper in @NatureMicrobiol we've opened up the Host-Virus Model Database, the @viralemergence team library of studies that try to predict the host-virus network. How does it work? 🧵
In our new paper, we define a taxonomy of six types of models that try to predict the host-virus network; in practice, they don't always look and feel like network questions (e.g., do some mammals have a higher richness of zoonotic viruses?) nature.com/articles/s4156…
We outline six big model "shapes": predicting host-virus associations; host / reservoir / vector identification; predicting zoonotic potential; predicting viral sharing; analyzing viral host range and host viral richness. Plus, some odd ones out (e.g., viral transmissibility)
You can think of HVMD as an annotated library of studies that apply statistics or machine learning to each of these different problems, including some information on the modelling - what data did they use? Which methods? What predictors did they try?
Let's see it in practice. Take this question from @b_longdon: what predicts (1) viral zoonotic potential and (2) viral host range? Both of those are network questions, and both have a pretty extensive evidence base in HVMD.
So drop into the AirTable, select "Host range" and "Zoonotic risk" studies, select studies that include viruses, and...
....there's 23 studies that use everything from logistic regression to reverse complement neural networks! An easy starting place when you're kicking off a study and looking for ideas, avoiding pseudoreplication, or just learning about how viruses work.
Since we started writing our study, this field has exploded. We're entering new studies all the time (and you'll see there's a bit of a backlog too) so keep checking back in, and let us know if you want to help / your paper should be in here!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Climate change has killed at least four million people. I wrote this because I felt like I was the only one who had noticed. If you ever read and share anything I've written, I hope it'll be this short piece, out today in @NatureMedicine nature.com/articles/s4159…
Cutting greenhouse gasses isn't enough anymore. National governments have to meet the challenge of climate and health with substantive commitments: access to essential medicines; access to high-quality care; access to food and clean water. And @WHO needs to give them a blueprint.
The present-day death toll of climate change exceeds every public health emergency of international concern before Covid-19 combined.
Eventually, @WHO will have to convene an Emergency Committee. The only question is whether @DrTedros wants it to be his legacy or the next DG's.
As an expert in climate change impacts on biodiversity, with half a decade of experience studying extinction, I think this kind of rhetoric from scientists toes the line on climate denial, and I think the way journalists relay it probably crosses that line theintercept.com/2022/12/03/cli…
There should be more perspectives from people who study climate-biodiversity relationships in these pieces as a counterfactual - it tells you something you don’t see those people espousing this framing. It’s really deeply troubling.
I also think it’s deeply telling that this framework mangles the idea of overshoot - an idea specific to passing policy targets temporarily with a long-term return, which is currently a top issue in climate - into a rephrase of safe operating spaces / planetary boundaries
Real talk, my most regretted pre-pandemic project idea that I shelved was putting together a podcast of climate scientists and writers doing 30 minutes of a climate-themed DnD campaign and 15 minutes of this-week-in-climate talkback. I'd still do it if I had the time!
It's especially hard not to go back to this idea after watching @dimension20show's A Starstruck Odyssey season, which I think plays with some of the same themes of capitalist dystopia that would make this a fun exercise while also keeping it light, fun, and meaningful
Absolutely fascinating because, among other things, absolutely all of this shit is completely and 100% made up. It's exactly as real a vision of the future as Spelljammer 5e. But, there are people who earnestly believe it, which is part of why science communication matters here
The geology, hydrology, ecology of this is 99% fabricated in service of an extremely real and consequential politic that imagines a second great era of colonialism. "Doomerism" isn't having a tired moment reading the newspaper: it's this specific accelerationist imaginary
I say this as someone who's famously skeptical about science communication: projects like Survive the Century from @beckbessinger, @EnviroSimon, and @christrisos matter here because they give the public tools to talk in the same terms about better futures survivethecentury.net
I know I've been quiet about work lately, between Verena ramp-up and a family medical emergency, so here are some other folks' work I'm very excited about or spending a lot of time with right now
The Polycrisis, over at @phenomenalworld and organized by @kmac and co., is an exciting new take on what's happening in the geopolitics and global strategy of climate and the things it touches 👇 phenomenalworld.org/interviews/geo…
The Climate Risk Lab at the University of Cape Town is doing a ton of important work right now on biodiversity, health, adaptation, justice, and the African continent - and I'm super excited to host @christrisos this week for a seminar on all of that! georgetown.edu/event/climate-…
The idea that "monkeypox spillback into rodents will prevent it from ever being eliminated" seems to be taking hold lately in some people's fears. At this stage, it's scientifically incorrect 🧵
1. Let's talk terminology.
A pathogen is eliminated when human-to-human transmission is fully interrupted (you achieve "zero human cases" for some length of time you decide makes sense).
A pathogen is eradicated when it's *gone* (think smallpox: only exists in labs).
(These terms are also generally used by global health practitioners to denote spatial scale - a country might eliminate a pathogen before it's globally eradicated; here I'm going to use both to mean global scale, as in, elimination is the end of "this" global outbreak.)