So let’s talk about prohibitionist Members of Congress who are also tobacco investors. First up, Rep. Ro Khanna. He’s a multi-millionaire, one of the richest in Congress, and he wants to strip away our right to switch from cigarettes to vaping. 🧵THREAD
But all that time, he has been systematically investing in major tobacco companies including Altria Group and Philip Morris. How do you think he got so rich! Here’s eight (8!) major investments he made just this year:
Khanna publicly promised not to invest in oil & gas or defense contractors because it offends his conscience. But with tobacco companies? Make it rain! nofossilfuelmoney.org/congressional-…
Next up is ultra-vocal vape hater Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ). He too loves to parade his opposition to vaping as a smoking cessation method and his friends at CTFK arrange media events for him at schools so he can pose as a public health champion.
But back at the office on Capitol Hill, he and his stock broker are making big investments in tobacco companies like Altria Group. Here’s his most recent purchase:
This might seem obvious but let’s say it plainly: Tobacco stocks go up when MORE PEOPLE SMOKE CIGARETTES.
Right, Mr. Gottheimer?
Rep. Dean Phillips (D-MN) is well aware and he eagerly supported the gargantuan vaping tax measure, which stripped out any tax increase on cigarettes.
He too is a multi-millionaire and his family fortune was built from the Phillips Distilling Company. They sell all kinds of flavored liquor including peach, honey, and “crackberry” whiskey:
Phillips is an investor in Philip Morris International and his family foundation invests millions in leading tobacco companies. forward.com/news/408443/de…
Here’s his most recent stock purchase of Philip Morris:
Next is Rep. John Yarmuth (D-KY), a man so impervious to shame and hypocrisy that he chairs the Congressional Whiskey Caucus while fighting to deny fellow Americans the right to quit cigarettes by vaping.
Is Yarmuth a tobacco investor too? Oh hell yeah. Here’s his most recent acquisition of Altria stock for his portfolio:
The problem here is not just the staggering hypocrisy of these guys. It’s that they also have direct access to the highest levels of policymaking that will enhance their investments. Some might call that “insider trading.”
So when Yarmuth and his colleagues decide to tax vaping out of existence, what do you think happens to tobacco stocks? They go way UP..!
But wait, isn’t that illegal? Yes, it is! But since that law was enacted, prohibiting Congresspeople from trading on inside knowledge, guess how many Members have been prosecuted? ZERO.
Here’s an article from just this week about dozens of Members violating that law. What was the average penalty they paid? $200. Yes — two. hundred. dollars. businessinsider.com/congress-stock…
So happy holidays, Congressdudes. Enjoy your turkey and flavored liquor punch, secure in the knowledge that the SEC will probably never knock at your door. The rest of us will be struggling to keep our vape shops open and our customers off cigarettes.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🔎 Let's talk for a minute about why the Supreme Court amicus brief from Sen. Dick Durbin might actually be a good thing. It's because Durbin's fanaticism and hyperbole are on such lurid display that it'll give the Court a clear sense of just who's pushing vape prohibition.
1/🪡
The first thing SCOTUS law clerks will notice is the Durbin brief is strictly partisan -- all the signatories are part of Durbin's particular wing of the Democratic party. On political issues, that's fine -- but in this context it signals there's no unanimity, as Durbin pretends.
The Court will also see that Durbin is not deploying measured persuasion but instead the most hyperbolic rhetoric he can dream up.
🚧 🧨 🚧
We need to talk about the debacle of 22nd Century's bet on low-nicotine cigarettes -- not only as an asinine business model but what the implosion says about @FDATobacco and the news media that covers nicotine policy. 1/ 🪡
Here is the company's stock chart for the last year and it's a complete wipeout. It's hard to overstate just how bad this is -- but if you invested in this company, you have basically lost your shirt.
But there was once a time, not long ago, when this stock was flying high -- selling for more than $1,200 per share with a market cap of nearly a billion dollars! What explains that? Why were investors flocking to this company?
By granting cert in the Triton case, the Supreme Court is now poised to rebuke @FDATobacco's unlawful and destructive vape regulatory scheme. But readers of the New York Times and Wall Street Journal, the nation's two biggest papers, would have no idea. They didn't cover it.
1/🪡
It's not like these papers don't obsess over SCOTUS / FDA. They've each got scores of stories in just the last few days, including this one on Loper fretting how the agency's "critics" (read: the American people) may confront the agency. (Shut up and eat your spinach, peasants!)
@By_CJewett even indulged Mitch Zeller whining that he can no longer rig the system for his friends. (Unmentioned: Zeller was the architect of the ban on flavored vapes that now has the agency facing an epic defenestration. Cheer up, Mitch, you're about to make history!)
It’s literally incredible. The world’s leading public health authority, @WHO, is now getting regularly lit up by @CommunityNotes for brazen and calculated deceits about nicotine vaping. Let’s take a close look.
THREAD 🪡
There is a widely-held scientific consensus that vaping is vastly less harmful than smoking. Yet with zero supporting evidence, WHO flatly insists the opposite, with the clear intent to dissuade the public.
Not only is WHO's claim wrong—they themselves have said it's wrong. Among the more than 100 scholarly sources cited in this community, two are from the World Health Organization itself!
Deceptive headline, half-truths and a whole lot of scaremongering. @USATODAY's @Mary_Walrath just wrote maybe the most irresponsible anti-vaping story we've ever seen. Let's do the fact-checking her editors should have done before publishing this train wreck. THREAD 🧵
Reporting on a study from @EmoryRollins, Walrath's piece veered off the rails immediately with the headline. There isn't a shred of evidence (in the article, the study or anywhere else) to support the claim that vapor poses a risk "like secondhand smoke."
We invite USA Today and Emory to prove us wrong. They won't, because there is no evidence causally linking nicotine vapor to *any* disease. Walrath buried this critical fact in the 9th (!) paragraph of her story.
🔎 This is horrendous. In a forum at @SMPAGWU yesterday (on misinformation!) @DrCaliff_FDA once again misleads Americans with the false notion that vaping is just as dangerous as smoking — thus deterring people from switching to a vastly safer alternative. 1/
Here's the verbatim remarks. Notice the false equivalence and the bunk gateway theory and how he lumps vaping in with lethal diseases -- even though vaping has injured or killed precisely no one and in fact saves lives.
Oh, more proactive you say? So far as we can tell, you haven’t lifted a finger to set the public record straight on what your own @FDAtobacco director says are widespread misperceptions about vaping.