And now, a mega-thread: If you've ever wondered what connects all our work at @viralemergence, our new paper in @NatureMicrobiol ties it all together. No, really. It's all one thing. Want to step through the Verena Cinematic Universe together?
Our team uses big data, statistics, and machine learning to understand "the science of the host-virus network", a broad methodological problem that includes a number of smaller, more applied problems. nature.com/articles/s4156…
If you want to study the host-virus network, you need data. But as @roryjgibb & co. showed, existing datasets are full of taxonomic inconsistencies and conflicts. We needed a synthesis. academic.oup.com/bioscience/art…
That's why we built Global Virome in One Network (VIRION), the most comprehensive (and clean) atlas of the vertebrate virome ever developed. biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
Our work doesn't stop there; @taddallas & co. built a new interface to the Ecological Database of the World's Insect Pathogens, one of the few resources available for the insect-pathogen network. ecoevorxiv.org/yd3x5/
What can we use those kinds of data to do?
(1) Predict the host-virus network!
@tpoi & co. propose a new method to recover the "missing" network (>90% of it), especially in the Amazon basin, which has been severely undersampled for wildlife viruses. arxiv.org/abs/2105.14973
@taddallas & co. have also recently shown that you can extend the host-virus network problem to predict the host-vector-virus network for mosquito-borne flaviviruses ecoevorxiv.org/xzmp8/
We've been able to use our host-virus network predictions + network embedding to create the most accurate artificial intelligence ever developed for zoonotic risk prediction. No, really. arxiv.org/abs/2105.14973
The backbone of that model was just published by @NardusMollentze with his own group, and I can't recommend this paper strongly enough. A masterpiece of predictive research. journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ar…
We've also written as a team about where tech like this might start to be useful for global health security, building on a workshop that brought together bench virologists, computational experts, and global health practitioners. royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.10…
In the future, it'll be important to go beyond zoonotic potential and also look at epidemic potential, including transmissibility... journals.plos.org/plosone/articl…
I should say - we owe so much on this to @bahanbug, who developed the foundational approach: identify what animals have some viruses of interest; use machine learning to predict which others might also have those viruses. journals.plos.org/plosntds/artic…
At the start of the pandemic, our team (led by @danjbecker and @Gfalbery) built the first multi-model comparison study to predict potential bat reservoirs of undiscovered betacoronaviruses. biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
We've spent the last two years proving that we can, actually, use artificial intelligence to optimize the search for new betacoronaviruses. Now we know that they work best when we actually use data on species "traits" - their ecology, evolution, immunology.
We also increasingly think that these predictions can be improved by using data that better represent reservoir competence for viruses (e.g., viral isolation instead of just PCR or serology) cell.com/trends/ecology…
In some of our collaborative work with the Forbes lab predicting rodent reservoirs of undiscovered orthohantaviruses in the Americas, we see that improvement when we model viral isolation vs. PCR: biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
We also think tools like this will increasingly help us anticipate pathogen "spillback" from humans into wildlife. This review by @annafagre & co. outlines the theory behind the approach, as well as the data we'll need... ecoevorxiv.org/sx6p8/
...and this new study by @bahanbug's group, which uses ACE2 sequences to predict potential wildlife hosts of SARS-CoV-2, is proof-of-concept that this could work! biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
4. Viral diversity: why do some animals have more viruses? Why do they have more *zoonotic* viruses?
Things get a bit complicated here. In some of my own work we've shown that we probably only really know about ~1% of the mammal virome (50k+ viruses). nature.com/articles/s4155…
@roryjgibb & co. showed that this creates a bit of a problem: where we look for viruses, we find them. And if we ask questions about viral diversity, the answers change over time. biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
@Gfalbery & co. showed that some key ecological hypotheses don't hold up after you correct for sampling bias. Sure, animals in cities have more known zoonotic viruses - because they have more known viruses, because we're looking more. biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
Results like these are an unexpected challenge to the "pace-of-life theory" - i.e., the idea that fast-lived species like rodents make immune investments and invade habitats in ways that predispose them to zoonotic risk. @Gfalbery and @danjbecker explain: cell.com/trends/parasit…
@Gfalbery@danjbecker We've also got some preliminary results that take this further, showing that domestication probably increases zoonotic viral richness, but involvement in the wildlife trade doesn't. github.com/viralemergence…
@Gfalbery@danjbecker 5. Which hosts share viruses with each other? @Gfalbery & co. showed that - like dozens of studies have shown at smaller scales - it's your proximity to other animals in geographic space and evolutionary time that determines how similar your viruses are nature.com/articles/s4146…
@Gfalbery@danjbecker@NatureMicrobiol Together, @Gfalbery and I have applied the same viral sharing model to predict how climate change-driven range shifts could completely reshape the global virome, creating hotspots of cross-species transmission in the places where we'll live in 2050 biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
@Gfalbery@danjbecker@NatureMicrobiol I'm really not kidding when I say "it's all one thing": predicting the next pandemic virus, tracing SARS-CoV-2 to its origin, projecting hotspots of climate-driven disease risk - it's all the science of the host-virus network. That's what we do. nature.com/articles/s4156…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Climate change has killed at least four million people. I wrote this because I felt like I was the only one who had noticed. If you ever read and share anything I've written, I hope it'll be this short piece, out today in @NatureMedicine nature.com/articles/s4159…
Cutting greenhouse gasses isn't enough anymore. National governments have to meet the challenge of climate and health with substantive commitments: access to essential medicines; access to high-quality care; access to food and clean water. And @WHO needs to give them a blueprint.
The present-day death toll of climate change exceeds every public health emergency of international concern before Covid-19 combined.
Eventually, @WHO will have to convene an Emergency Committee. The only question is whether @DrTedros wants it to be his legacy or the next DG's.
As an expert in climate change impacts on biodiversity, with half a decade of experience studying extinction, I think this kind of rhetoric from scientists toes the line on climate denial, and I think the way journalists relay it probably crosses that line theintercept.com/2022/12/03/cli…
There should be more perspectives from people who study climate-biodiversity relationships in these pieces as a counterfactual - it tells you something you don’t see those people espousing this framing. It’s really deeply troubling.
I also think it’s deeply telling that this framework mangles the idea of overshoot - an idea specific to passing policy targets temporarily with a long-term return, which is currently a top issue in climate - into a rephrase of safe operating spaces / planetary boundaries
Real talk, my most regretted pre-pandemic project idea that I shelved was putting together a podcast of climate scientists and writers doing 30 minutes of a climate-themed DnD campaign and 15 minutes of this-week-in-climate talkback. I'd still do it if I had the time!
It's especially hard not to go back to this idea after watching @dimension20show's A Starstruck Odyssey season, which I think plays with some of the same themes of capitalist dystopia that would make this a fun exercise while also keeping it light, fun, and meaningful
Absolutely fascinating because, among other things, absolutely all of this shit is completely and 100% made up. It's exactly as real a vision of the future as Spelljammer 5e. But, there are people who earnestly believe it, which is part of why science communication matters here
The geology, hydrology, ecology of this is 99% fabricated in service of an extremely real and consequential politic that imagines a second great era of colonialism. "Doomerism" isn't having a tired moment reading the newspaper: it's this specific accelerationist imaginary
I say this as someone who's famously skeptical about science communication: projects like Survive the Century from @beckbessinger, @EnviroSimon, and @christrisos matter here because they give the public tools to talk in the same terms about better futures survivethecentury.net
I know I've been quiet about work lately, between Verena ramp-up and a family medical emergency, so here are some other folks' work I'm very excited about or spending a lot of time with right now
The Polycrisis, over at @phenomenalworld and organized by @kmac and co., is an exciting new take on what's happening in the geopolitics and global strategy of climate and the things it touches 👇 phenomenalworld.org/interviews/geo…
The Climate Risk Lab at the University of Cape Town is doing a ton of important work right now on biodiversity, health, adaptation, justice, and the African continent - and I'm super excited to host @christrisos this week for a seminar on all of that! georgetown.edu/event/climate-…
The idea that "monkeypox spillback into rodents will prevent it from ever being eliminated" seems to be taking hold lately in some people's fears. At this stage, it's scientifically incorrect 🧵
1. Let's talk terminology.
A pathogen is eliminated when human-to-human transmission is fully interrupted (you achieve "zero human cases" for some length of time you decide makes sense).
A pathogen is eradicated when it's *gone* (think smallpox: only exists in labs).
(These terms are also generally used by global health practitioners to denote spatial scale - a country might eliminate a pathogen before it's globally eradicated; here I'm going to use both to mean global scale, as in, elimination is the end of "this" global outbreak.)