It's Black Friday, so it seems like the perfect excuse to repost my thread about getting cashback on your shopping. Last time, quite a few people found it useful.
In the last few years, I've accumulated a decent chunk of change from shopping as normal, as you can see below...
Earning cashback is very straightforward:
1) Join the cashback site
2) Shop at any of the thousands of online merchants it supports
3) Earn money on each purchase, either as a % of spend, or as a flat fee bonus
4) Withdraw the cash to your bank account, or take it as vouchers
Loads of well-known firms are taking part: Argos, Amazon, Etsy, Currys, eBay, Holland & Barrett, Boohoo, John Lewis, EE, Disney, Boden, B&Q, Asos, Joules, Lakeland, Virgin Media, O2, Vodafone, Money Supermarket, AO, Zavvi, Game etc.
Typically, you can expect to get 8-10% back on hotel bookings, 5-10% from fashion retailers, 1-3% from electrical stores, etc.
You can earn lump sum bonuses (£30-£100+) for new phone or SIM contracts, changing broadband provider or utility company, taking out insurance etc.
NOTE: The cash comes out of the fee that the merchant pays the cashback site for sending them shoppers.
In other words, the price you pay doesn't change. You simply get something back.
Literally "money for nothing", so long as you were planning to buy those things anyway.
You don't need to change where you shop. Just remember to check the cashback site when you're ready to buy something to see if that merchant is on it.
If they are, click the "get cashback" button next to their listing.
Your purchase will be tracked and cashback credited to you.
Purchases will normally show as having "tracked" within minutes, and will be displayed as pending in your account.
They may take a few weeks to be credited to your balance.
(Future events, such as hotel bookings or event tickets, only get credited after the date has passed.)
The Classic level cashback account is completely free.
You can choose to pay £5 a year to get a Plus account that will earn you higher levels of cashback, and give you various other bonuses. (The £5 annual fee will be deducted from the first cashback you earn.)
(If you use the above link, I get a small bonus at no cost to you after you start earning cashback. Thank you! Or Google "topcashback" to go directly to the site.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Labour can't be more "Leave" than the Tories. The latter delivered Brexit - it's rubbish, but it happened - continue to battle the EU every day in the tabloids, and are talking about shipping migrants off to the Falklands.
So they have to win by grouping together OTHER voters.
They won't do that if their big offering is Get the Tories Out. GTTO will never assemble enough votes.
But a stated intent to draw close to the EU through negotiations to rejoin the SM & CU would make huge numbers sit up and take notice. It would unsplit the vote in many seats.
The counter-argument seems to be "If Keir Starmer says anything else, he'll lose Leavers".
But they're already lost. They were lost in 2019, and the Tories have been doing the kind of stuff that gets their blood racing ever since.
For the first time, I've had to block a bunch of Remainers.
So depressing.
But it doesn't matter who you are. I'm not going to have you calling me an idiot.
Keir Starmer *could* say: "The UK needs a much closer relationship with the EU to make Brexit work. We're not going to seek to rejoin, but we will work hard to get businesses trading again and to banish Brexit red tape for firms and individuals".
Instead, he's tinkering.
Meanwhile, the mood of the country has so comprehensively shifted when faced with Brexit reality, even the Express (!) were recently forced to admit there's now a majority for Rejoin in the UK... express.co.uk/news/politics/…
"We have a [PM] who thinks it was enough to ‘get Brexit done’ and cares little about how to make Brexit work. Let me be clear: Labour does not want a rematch. Brexit has happened and we are not going to rejoin. But, clearly, the [deal] is full of holes."
Worth reading in full. Labour has nothing for you if you want to reverse Brexit. KS is trying to focus on other things at lightspeed. cityam.com/political-dram…
Of course, Brexit can't be overturned overnight.
But there's much to be gained from signalling the intent to form a closer relationship with the EU, especially since there's now a majority in the UK for rejoining. (Even the Express admits it!) express.co.uk/news/politics/…
Keir Starmer: "Let me be clear: Labour does not want a rematch. Brexit has happened and we are not going to rejoin. But, clearly, the government’s deal is full of holes."
"Made in the UK, Sold to the World: New strategy to boost exports to £1 trillion"
Extraordinary fantasist press release from the Tories.
Like a chef claiming that he'll win 3 Michelin stars, while ignoring the fact he just ripped his own taste buds out. gov.uk/government/new…
Of course, everyone knows that the best way to turbocharge exports is to make trade harder with the trading bloc a stone's throw away with which you do around half of all your trade.
There's nothing like a challenge to get exporters match-fit, and Brexit offers that on steroids.
BTW, there's also a glossy 66-page scribble attached to this fantasy plan.
Full of nuggets like talking about Peppa Pig as the perfect example of a British export, ignoring the fact it was sold off to the US conglomerate Hasbro a couple of years ago. assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
Did you know that the Qatar government spent over £100,000 bringing MPs from various parties over for a chat in October?
14 MPs are listed as having accepted a package of flights, hotels and hospitality in the most recent update of Members' interests. publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmregmem…
The problem is, the trip can of course be legitimate and above-board.
And yet at the same time, because the trip's being paid for by Qatar, that inevitably leads to an additional degree of deferrence towards the hosts which colours discussions consciously or unconsciously.
Why, if foreign trips are deemed essential for whatever purpose, can't the Government simply pay for them out of some kind of central fund?
That would remove any and all obligations to be beholden to third parties.