🧵THREAD🧵 (or how Israel wages war on foreign universities): On November 15th @DukeU's student government rescinded recognition of campus group Students Supporting Israel after it publicly targeted another student who said the move meant "my school supports settler colonialism."
The @DukeU SSI chapter (dozens at unis across US) posted screenshot of tweet to its Instagram and attacked her for it, in blatant breach of student government rules, then apologized publicly, then deleted apology, then appealed decision, which was upheld despite "pressure"...
In response, an ACT.IL WhatsApp group, which corrals users to oppose criticism of Israel online + directs them to like/comment on/share pro-Zionist material, yesterday directed its followers to sign a petition calling for SSI’s reinstatement.
Note, the post falsely branded the student’s “settler colonialism” remark was “anti-semitic”. The change.org petition now has almost 2,600 signatures, with the website noting once that reaches 5,000, the petition “is more likely to get picked up by local news.”
That slanderous petition was promoted via equally slanderous misleading articles @Sabrisun_Miller wrote for Daily Telegraph, Jewish Chronicle and Times of Israel. It got nearly 10,000 signatures, which meant it was “more likely to get a reaction from the decision maker!”
David of course sacked at start of October by @BristolUni, although he’s appealing decision – given two separate legal inquiries completely exonerated him of anti-Semitism, if that fails, they’ve surely been gotten to…
Small snapshot of how Zionist state secretly mobilises assets to create synthetic backlash pressuring institutions + stifling criticism of its destruction of Palestine and genocide of its people. Existence of networks cannot be branded conspiracy theory let alone anti-Semitic.
Especially relevant to consider given IMPRESS ruling which found @skwawkbox and @TheCanaryUK completely innocent of publishing anti-Semitic content. Those smears levelled solely due to their critical reporting of Israel's illegal activity severely damaged their reach and income.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵: With news that Israel is still contemplating a "limited strike" on Iran, important to understand why the US is so resistant to this, why it would be a complete and utter disaster of epic proportions for the Empire, and why fears of a wider war on Iran are overblown...
Iran's strike on Israel last October was absolutely devastating. Its timing, scale, and severity caught Tel Aviv and the US completely off guard. A clear gauntlet was thrown down to both, and they had no response, apart from trying to downplay its impact.
US bases in West Asia are to significant extent relic of when Iran was Western puppet state under the Shah. Their proximity to Iran means the Islamic Republic would be able to take most of them out entirely with hypersonic and ballistic missiles almost instantly if war erupted.
Pretty astonishing that nine days after my investigation into how Ukraine is a British-led proxy war, and London was central to Kiev's disastrous 2023 counteroffensive, The Times publishes basically the same article with a bit more colour:
Key point here that I've made again and again. Britain has been training fascist paramilitaries like Azov, Right Sector etc in Ukraine since 2015. This policy was influenced by Chris Donnelly, #IntegrityInitiative chief currently overseeing Britain's management of the proxy war.
2015 Kyiv Post article on the fascist paramilitary training program, quoting Chris Donnelly and Lithuanian ultranationalist Audrius Butkevicius. They plotted the 2022 attack on Kerch Bridge together.
🧵: Made this point in countless articles and interviews in past few months, but it bears repeating here: it is completely unfathomable that European leaders remain determinedly committed to keep the Ukraine proxy war when it is irretrievably lost for the West. And scary too...
By any objective measure, this has been a disaster on every conceivable level for Europe. They've deindustrialised, wrecked their economies, borderline disarmed by sending equipment to Kiev. The Russians are still marching, and the US - even if slowly - is backing off. It's over.
Only now are European leaders and their mainstream lackeys getting serious about rearmament, conscription, increased defence spending, etc. Their populations don't want any part of it, and nothing implemented now will be remotely meaningful in the short-term. It's all rhetoric.
🧵: This is huge. Priscilla Johnson McMillan interviewed Lee Harvey Oswald in the Soviet Union in 1959. She played a key role in shaping public perceptions of LHO as mentally unstable lone wolf Communist after JFK's assassination. But her role in the coverup went a lot deeper...
In September 1964, the Warren Commission was desperately trying to square the circle of LHO being in two places at once - Mexico City, and Cuban exile Sylvia Odio's home in Dallas, Texas. The Mexico trip in itself was deeply suspect. More here:
Warren Commissioner Senator Richard Russell disbelieved the single bullet bullshit and that LHO had gone to Mexico. So Priscilla miraculously found a bus ticket stub showing Lee travelled there while interviewing his wife Marina at home. More here:
BREAKING: Absolutely *damning* ECHR ruling finds Kiev bears heavy responsibility for the massacre of scores anti-Maidan activists in Odessa, May 2014. Inevitable Western media blackout on this, as it confirms what Russia was saying all along.🧵...
This being the ECHR (with a Ukrainian judge presiding, no less), the ruling is at pains to 'bothsides' the burning to death of dozens of anti-Maidan activists by Neo-Nazi lunatics. Nonetheless, it acknowledges local police and fire services "deliberately" allowed it to happen.
Nobody and nothing stepped in to rescue the anti-Maidan activists as they burned to death, and the ECHR finds this failure "went beyond an error of judgment or carelessness". Maidan authorities actively wanted these people to die, for the crime of being Russian.
🧵: Missed this ASTONISHING report from Feb 13th on how Germany's military is considerably *less* battle-ready than it was when the proxy war started. As a result of sending so much equipment to Ukraine, it's basically defenceless, and it will take years to rebuild what was lost.
When proxy war erupted, soon to be ousted Chancellor Scholz gave a bombastic speech about a "historic turning point" (Zeitenwende) that would mean revolutionary change in Europe, including building up Germany's military significantly. But this didn't happen. The *opposite* did.
Despite this, Germany reamins "alongside Poland...tasked by NATO with providing the bulk of ground forces that would act as first responders to any Russian attack on the alliance's eastern flank." Well, they're completely fucked if that happens, aren't they? Like instantly.