(0/5) #IOCprev2021 has been very inspiring. 5 thoughts that will most likely influence my next research and teaching (better stop reading if you don't want to be disappointed or, if anything, lose all hope for doing meaningul injury prevention research):
(1/5) Besides a single RCT (@thorsteindalen), there is no evidence on dose-response relationship in load management programmes for injury reduction. @NicolvanDyk
@NicolvanDyk (2/5) The inevitable need for advanced engin & stats approaches to pursue MSK injury risk reduction from interpreting training load data stands in stark contrast against the resources available to 99% of all sports practitioners. @westy160991 @bittencourt_nfn @EvertVerhagen
@NicolvanDyk @westy160991 @bittencourt_nfn @EvertVerhagen (3/5) Injury burden is a useful measure to justify the need for injury prevention. To justify injury prevention programmes though, one should add a measure of 'likelihood that a a change can be made' to the equation. No idea yet how! @RoaldBahr
@NicolvanDyk @westy160991 @bittencourt_nfn @EvertVerhagen @RoaldBahr (4/5) 3 most important things when thinking of buying a house: 'location, location, location'. 3 most important things when thinking of developing prevention to reduce injury risk: 'implementation, implementation, implementation' @Dr_CMcKay @LucaHespanhol
@NicolvanDyk @westy160991 @bittencourt_nfn @EvertVerhagen @RoaldBahr @Dr_CMcKay @LucaHespanhol (5/5) Improving an athlete's capacity to deal with the demands of their sport participation may be more 'robust' protection against MSK injuries than making them move safer, even if we want to do both. @philglasgow @TimGabbett
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
