1/11
Does Exercise Affect Lifespan?
This week’s newsletter highlights how knowing the answer in advance can undermine science. bit.ly/3HZhS8u
2/
Regular physical activity is one of the most important things people can do to improve their health. Exercise is associated with the reduction in risk of many adverse conditions, including: metabolic dysregulation, cardiovascular disease, cancer, neurodegeneration, and more.
3/
But is exercise a marker or a maker of improved health? Are all types of exercise created equal when it comes to longevity? Until recently, these questions had not been addressed in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Enter the Generation 100 study.
bmj.com/content/371/bm…
4/
Researchers conducted a study to test the effect of exercise and mortality. Half of participants were assigned to the control group & the others were assigned to either a high-intensity interval training (HIIT) group, or moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) group.
5/
All-cause mortality was nearly 40% lower in participants assigned to HIIT compared with controls, and about 50% lower when HIIT was compared with MICT, but these differences were not statistically significant.
6/
Given the results, should we conclude that exercise has no effect on all-cause mortality? Upon a closer look…
7/
we see that participants in the control group were asked to follow the Norwegian physical activity guidelines, which recommends a weekly exercise routine nearly identical to that of the MICT group.
8/
Why didn’t the investigators ask participants in the control group to be sedentary in order to test the effect of exercise on mortality? The investigators felt that it would be unethical.
9/
It’s a dilemma: to conduct a proper RCT the effect of exercise on mortality, researchers need a control group that is asked not to exercise. If they think that’s unethical, it means they’re already convinced that exercise directly affects lifespans.
10/
Are we already so confident that exercise directly affects lifespans that this question should be exempt from a randomized controlled clinical trial? And if so, how do we gain insight into this and other “forbidden” research questions?
11/11
Most likely, a combination of approaches is needed. Together, they’d likely stand a better chance of answering the exercise and longevity question than a single study designed with an inadequate control group. bit.ly/3nXcISr

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Peter Attia

Peter Attia Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PeterAttiaMD

10 Apr 20
In the following thread I touch on the recent discussion on Covid19 hypoxia/hemoglobinopathy theory, its implications, problems with the proposal, how to test it, and alternative explanatory theories. (1/9)
A recent computational biology preprint publication proposed that non-structural proteins coded for by COVID-19 could bind to hemoglobin and “knock-out” iron atoms, disrupting the ability of red blood cells to carry oxygen. (2/9)
If correct, infected patients would not be able to deliver adequate oxygen to their organs even if able to breathe freely. In this paradigm, hypoxia precedes ARDS instead of the other way around. (3/9)
Read 9 tweets
19 Jun 19
(1/8) Up before the enemy! @jockowillink is rubbing off on me... I’m normally up at 5:00 or 5:30, but don’t work out until 7 or so. Today I’m getting up at 3:30 and working out at 4:00 as part of my long-haul jetlag plan.
(2/8) I’m flying east today 9 hours (PST to EST; layover, then EST to GMT+2 = total of 9 hours). This kind of trip used to cripple me when I didn’t know how to manage jet lag. Now I can do it effortlessly.
(3/8) OBJECTIVE: adjust to new time zone as quickly as possible (i.e., day of travel)
STRATEGY: the moment I wake up, assume I’m in destination time zone and manage my adenosine, cortisol, and melatonin accordingly
Read 8 tweets
12 Jun 19
(1/8) I often get lots of questions about wearables. Most of the questions are about a specific device and whether I use it or think it has any value. That obviously depends on what you want to get out of the information the wearable provides you with.
(2/8) In general, I find the vast majority of wearables of little use to me. Why is this the case? Because they don’t fit my framework for what I think a wearable needs to address. My framework for what must be true of a “good” wearable (Attia Postulates):
(3/8) 1. What you’re measuring matters (e.g., HRV—matters vs. # steps taken—not so much). 2. What you’re measuring differs from day to day in ways that are not intuitive or linear (see above).
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(