Laying blame on the driver (or pedestrian or cyclist) is convenient for many powerful forces in transportation. But it’s counterproductive.
People do make mistakes that lead to crashes. But more often than not, other factors could’ve prevented or mitigated the collision.
What if the road engineer designed a less confusing intersection? What if the truck wasn’t so heavy or tall? What if the cyclist had a protected bike lane?
Focusing solely on human error ignores questions like these.
.@NHTSAgov, the road safety agency, gave birth to the 94% myth.
In a 2015 memo, NHTSA called human error “the critical factor” in 94% of crashes, defined as "the last failure in the causal chain of events" - NOT a sole cause.
But that context was subsequently ignored.
Now, NHTSA’s own website states, simply and misleadingly, that “94% of serious crashes are due to human error.” nhtsa.gov/technology-inn…
Even more than carmakers, autonomous vehicle companies have embraced the 94% myth. It underpins their claim that AVs will make crashes a thing of the past.
The predictable result: A road safety industry that pours millions of public dollars into “education campaigns,” implying that if people would be more careful, the crashes would cease.
As the USA downplays the danger of unsafe cars and infrastructure, the national traffic fatality rate is rising - and surging for pedestrians/cyclists. Meanwhile, Europe and East Asia have shown steady declines.
Rather than pour money into wasteful education campaigns, focus on designing safer cars and streets.
Europeans created Vision Zero as a way to examine all crash causes - but in the USA it's turned into an empty catch phrase and an excuse for politicians' inaction.
Where possible, shift crash investigations away from police - who instinctively search for a person to blame -and toward local DOT staff trained to find dangerous infrastructure.
Update the New Car Assessment Program (the one with crash test dummies) to evaluate risk posed to pedestrians and cyclists. The EU, Japan, and Australia already do this.
Even today’s slowest cars are quick enough for normal driving. Blazing-fast acceleration is pointless, and it shreds tires while endangering others on the street.
A root problem: State DOTs use models that assume ongoing future growth in car traffic.
According to their models, only wider highways can keep cars from being mired in gridlock, spewing emissions as they inch forward. (Transit? Density? Not relevant, sorry.)