David Zipper Profile picture
Nov 29, 2021 17 tweets 9 min read Read on X
In @TheAtlantic, I argued that the USA must stop claiming that human error alone causes 94% of traffic deaths (~40k per year, and rising).

Beyond being incorrect, it’s a deeply damaging myth.

A 🧵:
theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
Laying blame on the driver (or pedestrian or cyclist) is convenient for many powerful forces in transportation. But it’s counterproductive.

People do make mistakes that lead to crashes. But more often than not, other factors could’ve prevented or mitigated the collision.
What if the road engineer designed a less confusing intersection? What if the truck wasn’t so heavy or tall? What if the cyclist had a protected bike lane?

Focusing solely on human error ignores questions like these.

caranddriver.com/features/a3360…
.@NHTSAgov, the road safety agency, gave birth to the 94% myth.

In a 2015 memo, NHTSA called human error “the critical factor” in 94% of crashes, defined as "the last failure in the causal chain of events" - NOT a sole cause.

But that context was subsequently ignored.
Now, NHTSA’s own website states, simply and misleadingly, that “94% of serious crashes are due to human error.” nhtsa.gov/technology-inn…

Ex-@USDOT secretary Elaine Chao has repeated the 94% myth too: fortune.com/2017/02/26/tru…
With USDOT’s apparent blessing, journalists and academics have helped the 94% myth go viral.
Blaming human error is useful for carmakers, who escape scrutiny for building ever-larger SUVs and trucks that endanger other street users.

It also helps them sidestep criticism for refusing to offer safety tech features across all their models.

wthr.com/article/news/i…
Even more than carmakers, autonomous vehicle companies have embraced the 94% myth. It underpins their claim that AVs will make crashes a thing of the past.

That's not going to happen.
As Carnegie Mellon prof @PhilKoopman has shown, AV companies vastly exaggerate their potential to reduce crashes. AVs make mistakes too. safeautonomy.blogspot.com/2018/06/a-real…

Focusing on AVs distracts us from steps we could take *right now* to improve safety, like adjusting road & car design.
Worse, pinning blame on human error lets state transportation departments off the hook.

By targeting road users, state DOTs ignore their own responsibility to design safer streets and roads.
The predictable result: A road safety industry that pours millions of public dollars into “education campaigns,” implying that if people would be more careful, the crashes would cease.

The value of these efforts is dubious at best.
denver.cbslocal.com/2019/09/04/gia…
As the USA downplays the danger of unsafe cars and infrastructure, the national traffic fatality rate is rising - and surging for pedestrians/cyclists. Meanwhile, Europe and East Asia have shown steady declines.

Chart from @ITF_Forum: itf-oecd.org/road-safety-an…
What should the USA do? First, follow NTSB Chair @JenniferHomendy's suggestion and dump the 94% myth.

That should start with NHTSA, which gave birth to it.
Rather than pour money into wasteful education campaigns, focus on designing safer cars and streets.

Europeans created Vision Zero as a way to examine all crash causes - but in the USA it's turned into an empty catch phrase and an excuse for politicians' inaction.
Where possible, shift crash investigations away from police - who instinctively search for a person to blame -and toward local DOT staff trained to find dangerous infrastructure.

That’s what NYC is starting to do.
nyc.streetsblog.org/2021/03/25/pas…
Update the New Car Assessment Program (the one with crash test dummies) to evaluate risk posed to pedestrians and cyclists. The EU, Japan, and Australia already do this.

(This change was included in the infra. bill, and NHTSA should get moving.)
bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Finally, all of us should challenge claims that a crash was caused by the speeding driver, the jaywalking pedestrian, or the helmetless cyclist.

Look deeper - and search for contributing factors.

Safer roads begin when we stop blaming road users alone.
theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Zipper

David Zipper Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DavidZipper

Oct 2, 2024
The only way to prevent gigantic SUVs & pickups from killing pedestrians is to reduce car bloat.

Technology alone won’t do it – even if automakers claim otherwise.

Me, in @Slate 🧵

slate.com/business/2024/…
Image
Context: Oversized vehicles are deadly for everyone else on the street – and especially pedestrians.

They convey more force in a crash, take more time to brake, have huge blind spots, and are more likely to strike pedestrians’ head/torso.

slate.com/business/2023/…
Image
A pile of research links car bloat to the soaring number of US pedestrian deaths, which recently hit a 40-year high.

arstechnica.com/cars/2023/08/h…
Image
Read 8 tweets
Sep 26, 2024
Odds are good that your favorite European piazza/plaza/place used to be a parking lot.

Great story from @aitorehm with before/after pics:

Here’s Madrid’s Plaza Mayor [cont'd] politico.eu/article/europe…

Image
Image
Piazza Colonna, Rome
Image
Image
Praça do Comércio, Lisbon
Image
Image
Read 4 tweets
Aug 1, 2024
"0-60 time" is a car metric that needs to die.

Even today’s slowest cars are quick enough for normal driving. Blazing-fast acceleration is pointless, and it shreds tires while endangering others on the street.

Me in @FastCompany 🧵

fastcompany.com/91165821/how-f…
Image
0-60 times emerged in the 1940s, the brainchild of a car dealer and auto journalist named Tom McCahill.

In the 1950s, a now-pitiful 10.5-sec 0-60 time on a sports car was something to boast about. Image
Engines were less powerful in the 1950s and 60s, and 0-60 times provided useful info.

It’s no fun merging into a highway from a dead stop in a car that needs ~30 seconds to hit 60 mph (like a 1960s Volkswagen Beetle). Image
Read 8 tweets
Jul 31, 2024
The biggest source of urban noise? Motor vehicles.

In @CityLab, I wrote about the quiet (and healthy) pleasures of car-free and car-light neighborhoods.

🧵

bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Image
There’s an urbanist adage that cities aren’t loud; cars are loud. It’s really true.

~50% of urban noise is attributable to cars.

Everyone pays the price. Example : Researchers found that even mild traffic sounds make food taste worse. Image
More than annoying, car cacophony can damage health, causing high-blood pressure, heart disease, and mental illness.

In Denmark, 11% of all dementia cases were attributable to road noise

theguardian.com/society/2017/j…
Image
Read 9 tweets
Jul 29, 2024
US transportation agencies keep claiming that expanding highways will reduce climate change.

That's absurd.

In @voxdotcom I explained why. 🧵

vox.com/future-perfect…
Image
State DOTs (and the feds) regularly argue that adding highway lanes will reduce emissions.

Blue states, red states – they all do it. Example from Caltrans below.

Source: latimes.com/california/sto…
Image
A root problem: State DOTs use models that assume ongoing future growth in car traffic.

According to their models, only wider highways can keep cars from being mired in gridlock, spewing emissions as they inch forward. (Transit? Density? Not relevant, sorry.) Image
Read 4 tweets
Apr 28, 2024
Oversized SUVs and trucks worsen a slew of societal problems, including crash deaths, climate change, and tire pollution.

But rather than restrain car bloat, federal policy has actively encouraged it.

In @voxdotcom I explained how. 🧵

vox.com/future-perfect…
Image
First, a bit of context.

US cars have grown enormous. SUVs and trucks comprise 80%+ of new vehicles, up from ~25% in the 1970s.

SUVs and trucks steadily gain pounds and inches as models are refreshed.

jalopnik.com/trucks-and-suv…
Image
Car bloat -- the needless expansion of vehicles -- is a societal disaster (see the 🧵 below).

Problems include:
🔹 More road deaths
🔹 Increased air/tire pollution
🔹 Faster road wear
🔹 Pricier cars

Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(